BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34599249)

  • 1. Controlling for background genetic effects using polygenic scores improves the power of genome-wide association studies.
    Bennett D; O'Shea D; Ferguson J; Morris D; Seoighe C
    Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):19571. PubMed ID: 34599249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Haplotype function score improves biological interpretation and cross-ancestry polygenic prediction of human complex traits.
    Song W; Shi Y; Lin GN
    Elife; 2024 Apr; 12():. PubMed ID: 38639992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Non-parametric Polygenic Risk Prediction via Partitioned GWAS Summary Statistics.
    Chun S; Imakaev M; Hui D; Patsopoulos NA; Neale BM; Kathiresan S; Stitziel NO; Sunyaev SR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2020 Jul; 107(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 32470373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The omnigenic model and polygenic prediction of complex traits.
    Mathieson I
    Am J Hum Genet; 2021 Sep; 108(9):1558-1563. PubMed ID: 34331855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Underestimation of heritability using a mixed model with a polygenic covariance structure in a genome-wide association study for complex traits.
    Ryoo H; Lee C
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2014 Jun; 22(6):851-4. PubMed ID: 24149545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic determinants of polygenic prediction accuracy within a population.
    Lu T; Forgetta V; Richards JB; Greenwood CMT
    Genetics; 2022 Nov; 222(4):. PubMed ID: 36250789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A practical view of fine-mapping and gene prioritization in the post-genome-wide association era.
    Broekema RV; Bakker OB; Jonkers IH
    Open Biol; 2020 Jan; 10(1):190221. PubMed ID: 31937202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Making the Most of Clumping and Thresholding for Polygenic Scores.
    Privé F; Vilhjálmsson BJ; Aschard H; Blum MGB
    Am J Hum Genet; 2019 Dec; 105(6):1213-1221. PubMed ID: 31761295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
    Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic prediction of quantitative lipid traits: comparing shrinkage models to gene scores.
    Warren H; Casas JP; Hingorani A; Dudbridge F; Whittaker J
    Genet Epidemiol; 2014 Jan; 38(1):72-83. PubMed ID: 24272946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficient polygenic risk scores for biobank scale data by exploiting phenotypes from inferred relatives.
    Truong B; Zhou X; Shin J; Li J; van der Werf JHJ; Le TD; Lee SH
    Nat Commun; 2020 Jun; 11(1):3074. PubMed ID: 32555176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical Methods for Disease Risk Prediction with Genotype Data.
    Xia X; Zhang Y; Wei Y; Wang MH
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2629():331-347. PubMed ID: 36929084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Portability of 245 polygenic scores when derived from the UK Biobank and applied to 9 ancestry groups from the same cohort.
    Privé F; Aschard H; Carmi S; Folkersen L; Hoggart C; O'Reilly PF; Vilhjálmsson BJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2022 Jan; 109(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 34995502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing thyroid cancer risk using polygenic risk scores.
    Liyanarachchi S; Gudmundsson J; Ferkingstad E; He H; Jonasson JG; Tragante V; Asselbergs FW; Xu L; Kiemeney LA; Netea-Maier RT; Mayordomo JI; Plantinga TS; Hjartarson H; Hrafnkelsson J; Sturgis EM; Brock P; Nabhan F; Thorleifsson G; Ringel MD; Stefansson K; de la Chapelle A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Mar; 117(11):5997-6002. PubMed ID: 32132206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. POLARIS: Polygenic LD-adjusted risk score approach for set-based analysis of GWAS data.
    Baker E; Schmidt KM; Sims R; O'Donovan MC; Williams J; Holmans P; Escott-Price V; Consortium WTG
    Genet Epidemiol; 2018 Jun; 42(4):366-377. PubMed ID: 29532500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrasting the Genetic Architecture of 30 Complex Traits from Summary Association Data.
    Shi H; Kichaev G; Pasaniuc B
    Am J Hum Genet; 2016 Jul; 99(1):139-53. PubMed ID: 27346688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incorporating functional priors improves polygenic prediction accuracy in UK Biobank and 23andMe data sets.
    Márquez-Luna C; Gazal S; Loh PR; Kim SS; Furlotte N; Auton A; ; Price AL
    Nat Commun; 2021 Oct; 12(1):6052. PubMed ID: 34663819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhancing genomic prediction with genome-wide association studies in multiparental maize populations.
    Bian Y; Holland JB
    Heredity (Edinb); 2017 Jun; 118(6):585-593. PubMed ID: 28198815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adjusting for common variant polygenic scores improves yield in rare variant association analyses.
    Jurgens SJ; Pirruccello JP; Choi SH; Morrill VN; Chaffin M; Lubitz SA; Lunetta KL; Ellinor PT
    Nat Genet; 2023 Apr; 55(4):544-548. PubMed ID: 36959364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Complex-Trait Prediction in the Era of Big Data.
    de Los Campos G; Vazquez AI; Hsu S; Lello L
    Trends Genet; 2018 Oct; 34(10):746-754. PubMed ID: 30139641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.