179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3459994)
21. Film-screen systems: sensitometric comparison of Kodak Ektavision system to Kodak T-Mat/RA system.
Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Feb; 83(2):288-92. PubMed ID: 9117763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Temporomandibular joint pantomography using charge-coupled device, photostimulable phosphor, and film receptors: a comparison.
Farman TT; Farman AG
J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):9-13. PubMed ID: 10342155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of errors in film speed and beam alignment on the image layer in rotational panoramic radiography.
McDavid WD; Tronje G; Welander U; Morris CR
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1981 Nov; 52(5):561-4. PubMed ID: 6946384
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Faster screen/film combinations for cephalometric radiography.
Hurlburt CE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1981 Dec; 52(6):661-5. PubMed ID: 6947192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Sensitometric comparison of direct- and indirect-exposure films used in intraoral radiography.
Hashimoto K; Thunthy KH; Iwai K; Ejima K; Weinberg R
J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1992 Jun; 34(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 1500950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A clinical comparison of image quality and patient exposure reduction in panoramic radiography with heavy metal filtration.
Kapa SF; Tyndall DA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Jun; 67(6):750-9. PubMed ID: 2740096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Assessment of screen/film combinations for cephalometric radiography.
McNicol A; Stirrups DR
Br J Orthod; 1985 Jul; 12(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 3860251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effect of rare earth filtration on patient exposure, dose reduction, and image quality in oral panoramic radiology.
Tyndall DA; Washburn DB
Health Phys; 1987 Jan; 52(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 3804740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Relative speeds of Kodak computed radiography phosphors and screen-film systems.
Huda W; Rill LN; Bruner AP
Med Phys; 1997 Oct; 24(10):1621-8. PubMed ID: 9350716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An update on dental imaging.
Whaites E; Brown J
Br Dent J; 1998 Aug; 185(4):166-72. PubMed ID: 9769550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The comparison of subjective image quality in conventional and digital panoramic radiography.
Peker I; Toraman AM; Usalan G; Altunkaynak B
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 19336855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effect of dose reduction on the detection of anatomical structures on panoramic radiographs.
Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 16798925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Quantitative evaluation of film-screen combinations for x-ray diagnosis].
Bronder T; Heinze-Assmann R
Phys Med Biol; 1988 May; 33(5):529-39. PubMed ID: 3399512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Definitions of unsharpness and layer thickness in rotational panoramic radiography.
McDavid WD; Welander U; Kanerva H; Tronje G; Morris CR
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Jan; 57(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 6582441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Image resolution in the midsagittal plane of the Orthopantomograph-10 using Lanex regular and T-Mat G screen-film combination.
Chen SK; Hollender L
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Oct; 74(4):524-30. PubMed ID: 1408031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Clinical evaluation of intensifying screens and films for intraoral radiography].
Okano T; Yoda E
Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1983 Mar; 50(1):155. PubMed ID: 6577111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Selection of optimal screen-film combination for use in the neonatal intensive care unit.
Smith WL; Franken EA; Frangi SM; Windsor C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Dec; 139(6):1051-3. PubMed ID: 6756100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An evaluation of rare-earth imaging systems in panoramic radiography.
Gratt BM; White SC; Packard FL; Petersson AR
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Oct; 58(4):475-82. PubMed ID: 6593679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Diagnostic accuracy of in vitro panoramic radiographs depending on the exposure.
Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Feb; 36(2):68-74. PubMed ID: 17403882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [High intensification film-screen systems in thoracic diagnosis. A clinical comparative study].
Schäfer CB; Sokiranski R; Claussen CD
Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 8580141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
