153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3459995)
1. Radiographic quality control measurements comparing D-speed film, E-speed film, and xeroradiography.
Diehl R; Gratt BM; Gould RG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):635-40. PubMed ID: 3459995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of the sensitometric properties of screen-film systems and conventional dental receptors for intraoral radiography.
Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou L
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 2594331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A subjective study of dental diagnostic utility comparing xeroradiography and film radiography.
Gratt BM; White SC; Sickles EA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Nov; 68(5):653-60. PubMed ID: 2812719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
Farman TT; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. E-speed dental films processed with rapid chemistry: a comparison with D-speed film.
Kaffe I; Gratt BM
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Sep; 64(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 3477753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Frequency of artifacts with xeroradiography using artifact-reduction techniques.
Gratt BM; Sickles EA; Littman RI
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Nov; 62(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 3466131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A clinical comparison of xeroradiography and film radiography for the detection of proximal caries.
White SC; Gratt BM; Bauer JG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Feb; 65(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 3422729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A cost analysis comparing xeroradiography to film technics for intraoral radiography.
Gratt BM; Sickles EA
J Public Health Dent; 1986; 46(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 3457953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of dental xeroradiography and conventional film techniques for the frequency and significance of image artifacts.
Gratt BM; Sickles EA; Littman RI
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Nov; 60(5):546-52. PubMed ID: 3903601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing E- and D-speed film: the effects of various storage conditions on fogging.
Nesbit S; Platin E; Phillips C; Matteson S
J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Feb; 126(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 7860889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Processor quality assurance using digital imaging.
Goren AD; Dunn SM; Van der Stelt PF
N Y State Dent J; 1997 Apr; 63(4):42-7. PubMed ID: 9167431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of a "sandwich" technique to control image geometry in clinical studies comparing intraoral xeroradiographs and E-speed films.
Ludlow JB; Hill RA; Hayes CJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 May; 65(5):618-25. PubMed ID: 3163790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of E-speed film with added filtration.
Ponce AZ; McDavid WD; Underhill TE; Morris CR
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Mar; 61(3):297-9. PubMed ID: 3458135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensitometric and image quality performance of "rapid" intraoral film processing techniques.
Czajka J; Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K
Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):49-58. PubMed ID: 8785621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical recommendations for the use of D-speed film, E-speed film, and xeroradiography.
Gratt BM; White SC; Halse A
J Am Dent Assoc; 1988 Oct; 117(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 3066808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of Ektaspeed and Ultraspeed films using manual and automatic processing solutions.
Fletcher JC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Jan; 63(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 3468472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of thin K-edge filters on the image quality of D- and E-speed dental film.
MacDonald-Jankowski DS; Lawinski CP; Payne M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 8593903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Noise in D- and E-speed radiographic film.
Southard TE; Southard KA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Jun; 75(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 8515992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of scattered radiation and tube potential on radiographic contrast: comparison of two different dental X-ray films.
Helmrot E; Carlsson GA; Eckerdal O; Sandborg M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):135-46. PubMed ID: 1807997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A film and cassette holder for simultaneous xeroradiography and conventional radiography in longitudinal studies.
Griffiths GS; Coulthurst SK; Gillett IR; Johnson NW
Br Dent J; 1988 Jun; 164(11):365-7. PubMed ID: 3165014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
