These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3459995)

  • 21. Densitometric evaluation of intraoral x-ray films: Ektaspeed versus Ultraspeed.
    Kaffe I; Littner MM; Kuspet ME
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Mar; 57(3):338-42. PubMed ID: 6584823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sensitometric evaluation of four dental X-ray films using five processing solutions.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 10522195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An evaluation of the effect of processing conditions on mammographic film contrast, fog levels and speed.
    McLean D
    Australas Radiol; 1992 Aug; 36(3):234-7. PubMed ID: 1445107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Duplication of dental xeroradiographs.
    Gratt BM; Sickles EA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1981 Oct; 52(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 6946370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Imaging characteristics of new screen/film systems for cephalometric radiography.
    Fatouros PP; Gibbs SJ; Skubic SE; Rao GU
    Angle Orthod; 1984 Jan; 54(1):36-54. PubMed ID: 6584050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of developer temperature changes on the sensitometric properties of direct exposure and screen-film imaging systems.
    Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou LS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 Feb; 18(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 2599232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A clinical comparison between xeroradiography and film radiography for the detection of recurrent caries.
    Gratt BM; White SC; Bauer JG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Apr; 65(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 3163139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sensitometric comparison of speed group E and F dental radiographic films.
    Geist JR; Brand JW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 11420626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Automatic processing: effects of temperature and time changes on the sensitometric properties of light-sensitive films.
    Thunthy KH; Hashimoto K; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Jul; 72(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 1891230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Xeroradiography of dental structures. I. Preliminary investigations.
    Gratt BM; Sickles EA; Parks CP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1977 Jul; 44(1):148-52. PubMed ID: 267873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Densitometric evaluation of four rapid dental film processing solutions.
    Matthee MJ; Seeliger JE
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1991 Sep; 46(9):467-9. PubMed ID: 1820681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Xeroradiography of dental structures. II. Image analysis.
    Gratt BM; Sickles EA; Parks CR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1978 Jul; 46(1):156-65. PubMed ID: 277872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of xeroradiographs with occlusal and screen films.
    Thunthy KH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1978 Jun; 45(6):959-64. PubMed ID: 277860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of varying processing solution temperature on radiographic contrast and relative film speed of dental film.
    Matthee MJ; Becker PJ; Seeliger JE
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1990 Dec; 45(12):525-8. PubMed ID: 2098942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of kilovoltage on the relative speed of rare-earth screens.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 3460902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of storage conditions on film characteristics of Ektaspeed plus and Ultra-speed films.
    Platin E; Nesbit SP; Ludlow JB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Feb; 130(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 10036844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Densitometric evaluation of seven dental film processing solutions.
    Matthee MJ; Seeliger JE
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1990 Feb; 45(2):31-3. PubMed ID: 2385845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A pilot study on the quality control of film processing in medical radiology laboratories in Greece.
    Hourdakis CJ- ; Delakis J; Kamenopoulou V; Balougias H; Papageorgiou E
    Eur J Radiol; 2000 Jan; 33(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 10674786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Exposure reduction of 96% in intraoral radiography.
    Kircos LT; Vandre RH; Lorton L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1986 Nov; 113(5):746-50. PubMed ID: 3465788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Faster screen/film combinations for cephalometric radiography.
    Hurlburt CE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1981 Dec; 52(6):661-5. PubMed ID: 6947192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.