These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3459995)
41. Sensitometric evaluation of a new F-speed dental radiographic film. Price C Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 11175270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Sensitometric characteristics of dental xeroradiography. Gratt BM; Sickles EA Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Nov; 56(5):555-9. PubMed ID: 6580602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Is E-speed dental film more sensitive to storage than D-speed dental film? Petersson A; Lindh C; Nilsson M Swed Dent J; 1987; 11(4):159-62. PubMed ID: 3480614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Exposure times at which dental xeroradiographs and radiographs have comparable optical density. Alexander JB; Andrews JD Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Sep; 66(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 3174071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Image contrast in various cassette-screen-film combinations]. Barth HH; Grasser H Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1985 Dec; 40(12):1230-4. PubMed ID: 3869536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. An evaluation of the Sens-A-Ray digital dental imaging system. McDonnell D; Price C Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 8299829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Sensitometric evaluation of a new E-speed dental radiographic film. Price C Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 8593905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A clinical comparison of speed group D and E dental x-ray films. Horton PS; Sippy FH; Kohout FJ; Nelson JF; Kienzle GC Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Jul; 58(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 6589567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. High-speed, single-screen/single-emulsion film systems: basic imaging properties and preliminary clinical applications. Higashida Y; Frank PH; Doi K Radiology; 1983 Nov; 149(2):571-7. PubMed ID: 6622705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Image quality comparisons of X-Omat RP, L and B films. Van Dis ML; Beck FM Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):132-4. PubMed ID: 1807996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography. Borg E Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Power spectrum method used for comparing film and xeroradiography. Kashima I; Gratt BM; White SC Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1985; 14(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 3861416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. A comparison of manual and automatic processing in general dental practice. Rout PG; Rogers SN; Chapman M; Rippin JW Br Dent J; 1996 Aug; 181(3):99-101. PubMed ID: 8810109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Automatic processing: effects of temperature and time changes on sensitometric properties of ULTRA-SPEED and EKTASPEED films. Hashimoto K; Thunthy KH; Weinberg R Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Jan; 71(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 1994314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Densitometric evaluation of intra-oral radiographic film-processing solution combinations. Swart TJ; Seeliger JE J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1989 Jul; 44(7):281-3. PubMed ID: 2637510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Base and fog densities of fresh Ektaspeed Plus dental X-ray films. Sewerin IP Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Apr; 55(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 9176653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Time-delay image degradation with dental xeroradiography. Gratt BM; Kashima I; Sickles EA Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Dec; 54(6):696-700. PubMed ID: 6961349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A comparative clinical study of group D and E dental film. Frommer HH; Jain RK Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Jun; 63(6):738-42. PubMed ID: 3473400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]