These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34600295)

  • 1. Weight-based pay-as-you-throw pricing model: Encouraging sorting in households through waste fees.
    Ukkonen A; Sahimaa O
    Waste Manag; 2021 Nov; 135():372-380. PubMed ID: 34600295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From traditional to modern fee systems.
    Bilitewski B
    Waste Manag; 2008 Dec; 28(12):2760-6. PubMed ID: 18829291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Designing Pay-As-You-Throw schemes in municipal waste management services: A holistic approach.
    Elia V; Gnoni MG; Tornese F
    Waste Manag; 2015 Oct; 44():188-95. PubMed ID: 26235447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Charging systems for municipal solid waste: experience from the Czech Republic.
    Sauer P; Parízková L; Hadrabová A
    Waste Manag; 2008 Dec; 28(12):2772-7. PubMed ID: 18804364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Charging systems and PAYT experiences for waste management in Spain.
    Puig-Ventosa I
    Waste Manag; 2008 Dec; 28(12):2767-71. PubMed ID: 18783932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Review of household solid waste charges for developing countries--A focus on quantity-based charge methods.
    Welivita I; Wattage P; Gunawardena P
    Waste Manag; 2015 Dec; 46():637-45. PubMed ID: 26303651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unit-charging programs for municipal solid waste in Japan.
    Sakai S; Ikematsu T; Hirai Y; Yoshida H
    Waste Manag; 2008 Dec; 28(12):2815-25. PubMed ID: 18799298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Municipal household solid waste fee based on an increasing block pricing model in Beijing, China.
    Chu Z; Wu Y; Zhuang J
    Waste Manag Res; 2017 Mar; 35(3):228-235. PubMed ID: 28219297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Review of municipal waste management charging methods in different countries.
    Alzamora BR; Barros RTV
    Waste Manag; 2020 Sep; 115():47-55. PubMed ID: 32717551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of economic instruments for countries with low municipal waste management performance: An approach based on the analytic hierarchy process.
    Kling M; Seyring N; Tzanova P
    Waste Manag Res; 2016 Sep; 34(9):912-22. PubMed ID: 27121417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the variables affecting on the rate of solid waste generation and recycling: An empirical analysis in Prespa Park.
    Grazhdani D
    Waste Manag; 2016 Feb; 48():3-13. PubMed ID: 26482808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Municipal solid waste prevention: A review of market-based instruments in six European Union countries.
    Magrini C; D'Addato F; Bonoli A
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 May; 38(1_suppl):3-22. PubMed ID: 31928165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pay as you throw: strengths and weaknesses of weight-based billing in household waste collection systems in Sweden.
    Dahlén L; Lagerkvist A
    Waste Manag; 2010 Jan; 30(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 19833498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A review on automated sorting of source-separated municipal solid waste for recycling.
    Gundupalli SP; Hait S; Thakur A
    Waste Manag; 2017 Feb; 60():56-74. PubMed ID: 27663707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of collection schemes for packaging and other recyclable waste in European Union-28 Member States and capital cities.
    Seyring N; Dollhofer M; Weißenbacher J; Bakas I; McKinnon D
    Waste Manag Res; 2016 Sep; 34(9):947-56. PubMed ID: 27357560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Introduction of the circular economy within developing regions: A comparative analysis of advantages and opportunities for waste valorization.
    Ferronato N; Rada EC; Gorritty Portillo MA; Cioca LI; Ragazzi M; Torretta V
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Jan; 230():366-378. PubMed ID: 30293021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The implementation of PAYT system under the condition of financial balance in France.
    Le Bozec A
    Waste Manag; 2008 Dec; 28(12):2786-92. PubMed ID: 18804992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sustainable municipal solid waste disposal supply chain analysis under price-sensitive demand: A game theory approach.
    Ghalehkhondabi I; Maihami R
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Mar; 38(3):300-311. PubMed ID: 31752649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From pay-per-bag to pay-per-kg: The case of Flanders revisited.
    De Jaeger S; Eyckmans J
    Waste Manag Res; 2015 Dec; 33(12):1103-11. PubMed ID: 26500218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Status and prospects of pay-as-you-throw in Europe - a review of pilot research and implementation studies.
    Reichenbach J
    Waste Manag; 2008 Dec; 28(12):2809-14. PubMed ID: 18824346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.