These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 346006)

  • 1. Use of synthetic absorbable sutures for abdominal and chest wound closure. Experience with 650 consecutive cases.
    Murray DH; Blaisdell FW
    Arch Surg; 1978 Apr; 113(4):477-80. PubMed ID: 346006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Layer closure of laparotomy wounds with absorbable and non-absorbable suture materials.
    Irvin TT; Koffman CG; Duthie HL
    Br J Surg; 1976 Oct; 63(10):793-6. PubMed ID: 791437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The closure of abdominal wounds in cancer patients.
    Gallitano AL; Kondi ES
    J Surg Oncol; 1976; 8(5):413-6. PubMed ID: 136551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Running closure of clean and contaminated abdominal wounds using a synthetic monofilament absorbable looped suture.
    Iwase K; Higaki J; Tanaka Y; Kondoh H; Yoshikawa M; Kamiike W
    Surg Today; 1999; 29(9):874-9. PubMed ID: 10489128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Running synthetic absorbable suture in abdominal wound closure.
    Sloop RD
    Am J Surg; 1981 May; 141(5):572-3. PubMed ID: 7013514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Continuous absorbable vs interrupted nonabsorbable fascial closure. A prospective, randomized comparison.
    McNeil PM; Sugerman HJ
    Arch Surg; 1986 Jul; 121(7):821-3. PubMed ID: 3013123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of various methods and materials for treatment of skin laceration by a 3-dimensional measuring technique in a pig experiment.
    Zeplin PH; Schmidt K; Laske M; Ziegler UE
    Ann Plast Surg; 2007 May; 58(5):566-72. PubMed ID: 17452845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of suture material and technique of closure in wound outcome following laparotomy for peritonitis.
    Agrawal V; Sharma N; Joshi MK; Minocha VR
    Trop Gastroenterol; 2009; 30(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 20426290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Novafil. A dynamic suture for wound closure.
    Rodeheaver GT; Nesbit WS; Edlich RF
    Ann Surg; 1986 Aug; 204(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 3017248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Synthetic polyglycomer short-term absorbable sutures vs. polydioxanone long-term absorbable sutures for preventing incisional hernia and wound dehiscence after abdominal wall closure: a comparative randomized study of patients treated for gastric or colon cancer.
    Ohira G; Kawahira H; Miyauchi H; Suzuki K; Nishimori T; Hanari N; Mori M; Tohma T; Gunji H; Horibe D; Narushima K; Matsubara H
    Surg Today; 2015 Jul; 45(7):841-5. PubMed ID: 25556881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monofilament versus multifilament absorbable sutures for abdominal closure.
    Sahlin S; Ahlberg J; Granström L; Ljungström KG
    Br J Surg; 1993 Mar; 80(3):322-4. PubMed ID: 8472140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of suture materials on healing skin wounds.
    Van Winkle W; Hastings JC; Barker E; Hines D; Nichols W
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Jan; 140(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1108243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Closure of abdominal wounds with continuous nonabsorbable sutures: experience in 1697 cases.
    Rubio PA
    Int Surg; 1991; 76(3):159-60. PubMed ID: 1938203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Controlled clinical trial of three suture materials for abdominal wall closure after bowl operations.
    Corman ML; Veidenheimer MC; Coller JA
    Am J Surg; 1981 Apr; 141(4):510-13. PubMed ID: 6452825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is There an Advantage to Knotless Barbed Suture in TKA Wound Closure? A Randomized Trial in Simultaneous Bilateral TKAs.
    Sah AP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2019-27. PubMed ID: 25631171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abdominal midline incision closure. A multicentric randomized prospective trial of 3,135 patients, comparing continuous vs interrupted polyglycolic acid sutures.
    Fagniez PL; Hay JM; Lacàine F; Thomsen C
    Arch Surg; 1985 Dec; 120(12):1351-3. PubMed ID: 2998297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abdominal wound closure with a continuous monofilament polypropylene suture. Experience with 1,000 consecutive cases.
    Knight CD; Griffen FD
    Arch Surg; 1983 Nov; 118(11):1305-8. PubMed ID: 6357147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Amount of suture material needed for continuous or interrupted wound closure: an experimental study.
    Trimbos JB; van Rooij J
    Eur J Surg; 1993 Mar; 159(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 8102887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The figure-of-8 through-and-through monofilament abdominal wound closure with wound splints: elimination of evisceration in poor-risk wounds over 25 years.
    Dennis C; Aka E
    Surgery; 1973 Feb; 73(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 4265312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oblique intradermal suture as a faster choice for intradermal closure: a randomized equivalence trial.
    Wongkietkachorn A; Wongkietkachorn N; Rhunsiri P
    J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2019 Feb; 53(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 30380956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.