176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34601634)
1. The impact of different dental restorations on detection of proximal caries by cone beam computed tomography.
Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Abou El-Fotouh M
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Mar; 26(3):2413-2420. PubMed ID: 34601634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of different restorative materials on the detection of approximal caries in cone-beam computed tomography scans with and without metal artifact reduction mode.
Cebe F; Aktan AM; Ozsevik AS; Ciftci ME; Surmelioglu HD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Mar; 123(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 28111155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic accuracy of different display types in detection of recurrent caries under restorations by using CBCT.
Baltacıoĝlu İH; Eren H; Yavuz Y; Kamburoğlu K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(6):20160099. PubMed ID: 27319604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the effect of amalgam fillings on the diagnosis of proximal caries using cone-beam computed tomography technique.
Abdinian M; Sharifi M; Tafti KT
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2023; 20():92. PubMed ID: 37810453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of CBCT and intraoral radiography for proximal caries detection in the presence of different dental restoration materials.
Mosavat F; Ahmadi E; Amirfarhangi S; Rafeie N
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):419. PubMed ID: 37353807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visibility of artificial buccal recurrent caries under restorations using different radiographic techniques.
Murat S; Kamburoğlu K; Isayev A; Kurşun S; Yüksel S
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 22917443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth.
Rasines Alcaraz MG; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD005620. PubMed ID: 24683067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography and digital intraoral radiography performance in the detection of artificially induced recurrent caries-like lesions.
Sousa Melo SL; Belem MDF; Prieto LT; Tabchoury CPM; Haiter-Neto F
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Sep; 124(3):306-314. PubMed ID: 28690085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Intraoral Radiography in Detection of Recurrent Caries under Composite Restorations.
Kasraei S; Shokri A; Poorolajal J; Khajeh S; Rahmani H
Braz Dent J; 2017; 28(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 28301024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of Amalgam Restorations and Operation Parameters on Diagnostic Accuracy of Caries Detection Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: An In Vitro Study.
Mehanny M; AlMohareb RA; Noujeim M
Scanning; 2021; 2021():2679012. PubMed ID: 34484553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in detecting secondary caries under composite fillings: an in vitro study.
Yildizer Keris E; Demirel O; Ozdede M; Altunkaynak B; Peker I
J Istanb Univ Fac Dent; 2017; 51(1):22-27. PubMed ID: 28955582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth.
Innes NP; Ricketts D; Chong LY; Keightley AJ; Lamont T; Santamaria RM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Dec; 2015(12):CD005512. PubMed ID: 26718872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG
Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of amalgam fillings on the detection of approximal caries by cone beam CT: in vitro study.
Kulczyk T; Dyszkiewicz Konwińska M; Owecka M; Krzyżostaniak J; Surdacka A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(7):20130342. PubMed ID: 24986630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection accuracy of proximal caries by phosphor plate and cone-beam computerized tomography images scanned with different resolutions.
Cheng JG; Zhang ZL; Wang XY; Zhang ZY; Ma XC; Li G
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1015-21. PubMed ID: 21805053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Longevity and associated risk factors in adhesive restorations of young permanent teeth after complete and selective caries removal: a retrospective study.
Casagrande L; Seminario AT; Correa MB; Werle SB; Maltz M; Demarco FF; Araujo FB
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Apr; 21(3):847-855. PubMed ID: 27103587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of Cone-beam Computed Tomography and Extraoral Bitewings Compared to Intraoral Bitewings in Detection of Interproximal Caries.
Felemban OM; Loo CY; Ramesh A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Dec; 21(12):1361-1367. PubMed ID: 33893259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Accuracy of computer aided measurement for detecting dental proximal caries lesions in images of cone-beam computed tomography].
Zhang ZL; Li JP; Li G; Ma XC
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 52(2):103-108. PubMed ID: 28253585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
