128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34602372)
1. Exploring the reliability of the exposure index with a range of kV and mAs values: An experimental study.
van Schoonhoven MT; Hayre DCM; England DA
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Dec; 52(4):559-566. PubMed ID: 34602372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR
Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of radiographic techniques (kVp and mAs) on image quality and patient doses in digital subtraction angiography.
Gkanatsios NA; Huda W; Peters KR
Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1643-50. PubMed ID: 12201409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The validity and reliability of the exposure index as a metric for estimating the radiation dose to the patient.
Erenstein HG; Browne D; Curtin S; Dwyer RS; Higgins RN; Hommel SF; Menzinga J; Pires Jorge JA; Sauty M; de Vries G; England A
Radiography (Lond); 2020 Oct; 26 Suppl 2():S94-S99. PubMed ID: 32291123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of increased Al filtration on x-ray tube loading and image quality in diagnostic radiology.
Behrman RH
Med Phys; 2003 Jan; 30(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 12557981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of organ dose from chest radiography with varying beam quality and constant exposure index.
Nakanishi K
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2023 Sep; 46(3):1143-1151. PubMed ID: 37245193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultra-high pitch chest computed tomography at 70 kVp tube voltage in an anthropomorphic pediatric phantom and non-sedated pediatric patients: Initial experience with 3
Hagelstein C; Henzler T; Haubenreisser H; Meyer M; Sudarski S; Schoenberg SO; Neff KW; Weis M
Z Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 26(4):349-361. PubMed ID: 26702762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Circle of Willis at CT angiography: dose reduction and image quality--reducing tube voltage and increasing tube current settings.
Waaijer A; Prokop M; Velthuis BK; Bakker CJ; de Kort GA; van Leeuwen MS
Radiology; 2007 Mar; 242(3):832-9. PubMed ID: 17229873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal multidetector row CT parameters for evaluations of the breast: a phantom and specimen study.
Yi A; Seo BK; Cho PK; Pisano ED; Lee KY; Je BK; Kim HY; Min BW; Son GS
Acad Radiol; 2010 Jun; 17(6):744-51. PubMed ID: 20457417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of beam tube potential variation on gonad dose to patients during chest radiography investigated using high sensitivity LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescent dosemeters.
Fung KK; Gilboy WB
Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):358-67. PubMed ID: 11387155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A pilot study investigating two dose reduction techniques for AP lumbar spine radiography using direct dosimetry and Projection VR.
Shanahan MC
Radiography (Lond); 2017 Aug; 23(3):222-228. PubMed ID: 28687290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing 10 kVp and 15% Rules in Extremity Radiography.
Coffey H; Chanopensiri V; Ly B; Nguyen D
Radiol Technol; 2020 Jul; 91(6):516-524. PubMed ID: 32606229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A method to derive appropriate exposure parameters from target exposure index and patient thickness in pediatric digital radiography.
Zhang M; Liu K; Niu X; Liu X
Pediatr Radiol; 2013 Mar; 43(5):568-74. PubMed ID: 23208532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High kilovoltage digital exposure techniques and patient dosimetry.
Fauber TL; Cohen TF; Dempsey MC
Radiol Technol; 2011; 82(6):501-10. PubMed ID: 21771934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are exposure index values consistent in clinical practice? A multi-manufacturer investigation.
Butler ML; Rainford L; Last J; Brennan PC
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):371-4. PubMed ID: 20223849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of two objective methods to optimize kVp and personnel exposure using a digital indirect flat panel detector and simulated veterinary patients.
Copple C; Robertson ID; Thrall DE; Samei E
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2013; 54(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 23293957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultralow-dose chest computed tomography for pulmonary nodule detection: first performance evaluation of single energy scanning with spectral shaping.
Gordic S; Morsbach F; Schmidt B; Allmendinger T; Flohr T; Husarik D; Baumueller S; Raupach R; Stolzmann P; Leschka S; Frauenfelder T; Alkadhi H
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):465-73. PubMed ID: 24598443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Body size and tube voltage-dependent guiding equations for optimal selection of image acquisition parameters in clinical X-ray imaging.
Zheng X
Radiol Phys Technol; 2018 Jun; 11(2):212-218. PubMed ID: 29667102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A radiation exposure index for CT.
Huda W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Dec; 157(2):172-80. PubMed ID: 23690648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
