128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34602372)
21. Exposure creep in computed radiography: a longitudinal study.
Gibson DJ; Davidson RA
Acad Radiol; 2012 Apr; 19(4):458-62. PubMed ID: 22225727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mobile C-arm cone-beam CT for guidance of spine surgery: image quality, radiation dose, and integration with interventional guidance.
Schafer S; Nithiananthan S; Mirota DJ; Uneri A; Stayman JW; Zbijewski W; Schmidgunst C; Kleinszig G; Khanna AJ; Siewerdsena JH
Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4563-74. PubMed ID: 21928628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An assessment of exposure indices in computed radiography for the posterior-anterior chest and the lateral lumbar spine.
Warren-Forward H; Arthur L; Hobson L; Skinner R; Watts A; Clapham K; Lou D; Cook A
Br J Radiol; 2007 Jan; 80(949):26-31. PubMed ID: 16916804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape.
Siegel MJ; Schmidt B; Bradley D; Suess C; Hildebolt C
Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):515-22. PubMed ID: 15358847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Exposure variability and image quality in computed radiography.
Fauber TL
Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19153197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. OPTIMIZING IMAGE QUALITY, RADIATION DOSAGE TO THE PATIENT AND TO THE DETECTOR IN PEDIATRIC CHEST RADIOGRAPHY: A PHANTOM STUDY OF A PORTABLE DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEM.
Shahgeldi K; Sjöberg T; Nordström J; Lesanu R; Svahn TM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(4):414-420. PubMed ID: 30916753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. PATIENT DOSE ASSESSMENT AND OPTIMISATION OF PELVIC RADIOGRAPHY WITH COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
Abbeyquaye D; Inkoom S; Hammond NB; Fletcher JJ; Botwe BO
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 Aug; 195(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 34320643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of radiation dose and iterative reconstruction on lung lesion conspicuity at MDCT: does one size fit all?
Botelho MP; Agrawal R; Gonzalez-Guindalini FD; Hart EM; Patel SK; Töre HG; Yaghmai V
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e726-33. PubMed ID: 23928232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems.
Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH
Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Patient dosimetry and image quality in digital radiology from online audit of the X-ray system.
Vano E; Fernandez JM; Ten JI; Gonzalez L; Guibelalde E; Prieto C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):199-203. PubMed ID: 16461529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Patient dose in digital mammography.
Chevalier M; Morán P; Ten JI; Fernández Soto JM; Cepeda T; Vañó E
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2471-9. PubMed ID: 15487727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Modifications to mobile chest radiography technique during the COVID-19 pandemic - implications of X-raying through side room windows.
England A; Littler E; Romani S; Cosson P
Radiography (Lond); 2021 Feb; 27(1):193-199. PubMed ID: 32855021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Automatic exposure control in multichannel CT with tube current modulation to achieve a constant level of image noise: experimental assessment on pediatric phantoms.
Brisse HJ; Madec L; Gaboriaud G; Lemoine T; Savignoni A; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):3018-33. PubMed ID: 17822010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Dose optimization in pediatric cardiac x-ray imaging.
Gislason AJ; Davies AG; Cowen AR
Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5258-69. PubMed ID: 21089760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Proper Management of the Clinical Exposure Index Based on Body Thickness Using Dose Optimization Tools in Digital Chest Radiography: A Phantom Study.
Yoon Y; Park H; Kim J; Kim J; Roh Y; Tanaka N; Morishita J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 May; 18(10):. PubMed ID: 34068390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Feasibility of an image planning system for kilovoltage image-guided radiation therapy.
Thapa BB; Molloy JA
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061703. PubMed ID: 23718582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. CT angiography of the aorta using 80 kVp in combination with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction and automated tube current modulation: Effects on image quality and radiation dose.
Boos J; Aissa J; Lanzman RS; Heusch P; Schimmöller L; Schleich C; Thomas C; Antoch G; Kröpil P
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 60(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 26749531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of acquisition parameters on dose and image quality optimisation in paediatric pelvis radiography-A phantom study.
Mohammed Ali A; Hogg P; Abuzaid M; England A
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():130-137. PubMed ID: 31439232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of beam energy and filtration on the signal-to-noise ratio of the Dexis intraoral X-ray detector.
Kitagawa H; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 15140818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study.
Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; DeLong DM; Szucs-Farkas Z
Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 19409820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
