These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
45. Grid removal and impact on population dose in full-field digital mammography. Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Klausz R; Alberelli C; di Maggio C Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):547-55. PubMed ID: 17388172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. THE CONSISTENCY OF EXPOSURE INDICATOR VALUES IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS. Jamil A; Mohd MI; Zain NM Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(4):413-418. PubMed ID: 29767799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Optimizing the Exposure Indicator as a Dose Management Strategy in Computed Radiography. Seeram E; Davidson R; Bushong S; Swan H Radiol Technol; 2016; 87(4):380-91. PubMed ID: 26952062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Low dose high energy x-ray in-line phase sensitive imaging prototype: Investigation of optimal geometric conditions and design parameters. Ghani MU; Yan A; Wong MD; Li Y; Ren L; Wu X; Liu H J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(6):667-82. PubMed ID: 26756405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Feasibility of real time dual-energy imaging based on a flat panel detector for coronary artery calcium quantification. Xu T; Ducote JL; Wong JT; Molloi S Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1612-22. PubMed ID: 16872069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Image quality comparison between single energy and dual energy CT protocols for hepatic imaging. Yao Y; Ng JM; Megibow AJ; Pelc NJ Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4877. PubMed ID: 27487905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Assessment of image quality on effects of varying tube voltage and automatic tube current modulation with hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominal/pelvic CT: a phantom study. Vardhanabhuti V; Loader R; Roobottom CA Invest Radiol; 2013 Mar; 48(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 23344519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Adult abdomen-pelvis CT: Does equilibrium dose-pitch product better account for the kVp dependence of organ dose than conventional CTDI? Li X; Morgan AG; Liptak CL; Muryn JS; Dong FF; Primak AN; Segars WP Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6258-68. PubMed ID: 26520718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparing subjective and objective image quality at two different radiation exposure ranges of the paranasal sinus CT examinations using a volumetric 320-row detector CT system. Pirimoglu B; Sade R; Sakat MS; Ogul H; Eren S; Kantarci M Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Dec; 46(8):20170212. PubMed ID: 28937286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Dual-energy, standard and low-kVp contrast-enhanced CT-cholangiography: a comparative analysis of image quality and radiation exposure. Stiller W; Schwarzwaelder CB; Sommer CM; Veloza S; Radeleff BA; Kauczor HU Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1405-12. PubMed ID: 21458939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. A simplified approach to characterizing a kilovoltage source spectrum for accurate dose computation. Poirier Y; Kouznetsov A; Tambasco M Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3041-50. PubMed ID: 22755689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Intraoperative cone-beam CT for guidance of head and neck surgery: Assessment of dose and image quality using a C-arm prototype. Daly MJ; Siewerdsen JH; Moseley DJ; Jaffray DA; Irish JC Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3767-80. PubMed ID: 17089842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Size-dependent scanning parameters (kVp and mAs) for photon-counting spectral CT system in pediatric imaging: simulation study. Chen H; Danielsson M; Xu C Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jun; 61(11):4105-26. PubMed ID: 27163252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Investigation of dose reduction in neonatal radiography using specially designed phantoms and LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs. Duggan L; Warren-Forward H; Smith T; Kron T Br J Radiol; 2003 Apr; 76(904):232-7. PubMed ID: 12711642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Effect of automatic tube voltage selection on image quality and radiation dose in abdominal CT angiography of various body sizes: a phantom study. Schindera ST; Winklehner A; Alkadhi H; Goetti R; Fischer M; Gnannt R; Szucs-Farkas Z Clin Radiol; 2013 Feb; 68(2):e79-86. PubMed ID: 23219454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Second-generation dual-energy computed tomography of the abdomen: radiation dose comparison with 64- and 128-row single-energy acquisition. De Cecco CN; Darnell A; Macías N; Ayuso JR; Rodríguez S; Rimola J; Pagés M; García-Criado Á; Rengo M; Muscogiuri G; Laghi A; Ayuso C J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(4):543-6. PubMed ID: 23863529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]