190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34603954)
1. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion - A narrative review on the present status.
Phani Kiran S; Sudhir G
J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2021 Nov; 22():101592. PubMed ID: 34603954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical and Radiographic Comparisons among Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison with Three-Way Matching.
Yingsakmongkol W; Jitpakdee K; Varakornpipat P; Choentrakool C; Tanasansomboon T; Limthongkul W; Singhatanadgige W; Kotheeranurak V
Asian Spine J; 2022 Oct; 16(5):712-722. PubMed ID: 35065546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis.
Zhang QY; Tan J; Huang K; Xie HQ
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Sep; 22(1):802. PubMed ID: 34537023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive anterior, lateral, and oblique lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review.
Xu DS; Walker CT; Godzik J; Turner JD; Smith W; Uribe JS
Ann Transl Med; 2018 Mar; 6(6):104. PubMed ID: 29707553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF.
Mobbs RJ; Phan K; Malham G; Seex K; Rao PJ
J Spine Surg; 2015 Dec; 1(1):2-18. PubMed ID: 27683674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does interbody cage lordosis impact actual segmental lordosis achieved in minimally invasive lumbar spine fusion?
Lovecchio FC; Vaishnav AS; Steinhaus ME; Othman YA; Gang CH; Iyer S; McAnany SJ; Albert TJ; Qureshi SA
Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E17. PubMed ID: 32871566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Keorochana G; Setrkraising K; Woratanarat P; Arirachakaran A; Kongtharvonskul J
Neurosurg Rev; 2018 Jul; 41(3):755-770. PubMed ID: 28013419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
Han XG; Tang GQ; Han X; Xing YG; Zhang Q; He D; Tian W
Orthop Surg; 2021 Oct; 13(7):2093-2101. PubMed ID: 34596342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of complication rates of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of the literature.
Joseph JR; Smith BW; La Marca F; Park P
Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Oct; 39(4):E4. PubMed ID: 26424344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion with Percutaneous Posterior Fixation in Lateral Position and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
Koike Y; Kotani Y; Terao H; Iwasaki N
Asian Spine J; 2021 Feb; 15(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 32521951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion vs. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Gao QY; Wei FL; Li T; Zhu KL; Du MR; Heng W; Yang F; Gao HR; Qian JX; Zhou CP
Front Med (Lausanne); 2022; 9():829426. PubMed ID: 35665352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lumbar interbody fusion rates with 3D-printed lamellar titanium cages using a silicate-substituted calcium phosphate bone graft.
Mokawem M; Katzouraki G; Harman CL; Lee R
J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 68():134-139. PubMed ID: 31351704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. More nerve root injuries occur with minimally invasive lumbar surgery, especially extreme lateral interbody fusion: A review.
Epstein NE
Surg Neurol Int; 2016; 7(Suppl 3):S83-95. PubMed ID: 26904372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Restoration of lumbar lordosis after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review.
Carlson BB; Saville P; Dowdell J; Goto R; Vaishnav A; Gang CH; McAnany S; Albert TJ; Qureshi S
Spine J; 2019 May; 19(5):951-958. PubMed ID: 30529420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of O-arm navigation and microscope-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis.
Peng P; Chen K; Chen H; Zhang K; Sun J; Yang P; Zhou F; Liu Y; Yang H; Mao H
J Orthop Translat; 2020 Jan; 20():107-112. PubMed ID: 31908941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Expandable Cage Technology-Transforaminal, Anterior, and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Macki M; Hamilton T; Haddad YW; Chang V
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2021 Jun; 21(Suppl 1):S69-S80. PubMed ID: 34128070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 16: bone graft extenders and substitutes as an adjunct for lumbar fusion.
Kaiser MG; Groff MW; Watters WC; Ghogawala Z; Mummaneni PV; Dailey AT; Choudhri TF; Eck JC; Sharan A; Wang JC; Dhall SS; Resnick DK
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jul; 21(1):106-32. PubMed ID: 24980593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation at L5/S1.
Jacob KC; Patel MR; Ribot MA; Parsons AW; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
World Neurosurg; 2022 Jan; 157():e111-e122. PubMed ID: 34610449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
