155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34605487)
1. A Comparative Study between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical FIGO Criteria in Different Stages of Carcinoma Cervix.
Zubery MH; Rahman FB; Islam MN; Datta A; Rahman T; Mahdi R
Mymensingh Med J; 2021 Oct; 30(4):1131-1138. PubMed ID: 34605487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of carcinoma cervix using magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with clinical FIGO staging and impact on management.
Dhoot NM; Kumar V; Shinagare A; Kataki AC; Barmon D; Bhuyan U
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2012 Feb; 56(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 22339747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Primary uterine cervical cancer: correlation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings.
Kraljević Z; Visković K; Ledinsky M; Zadravec D; Grbavac I; Bilandzija M; Soljacić-Vranes H; Kuna K; Klasnić K; Krolo I
Coll Antropol; 2013 Jun; 37(2):561-8. PubMed ID: 23941005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.
Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Chi DS; Amendola MA; Brandt K; Schwartz LH; Koelliker S; Siegelman ES; Brown JJ; McGhee RB; Iyer R; Vitellas KM; Snyder B; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Mitchell DG; ;
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9329-37. PubMed ID: 16361632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Parametrial Status in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Prospective Study on Diagnostic Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound.
Perniola G; Fischetti M; Tomao F; Di Donato V; Palaia I; Santangelo G; Lecce F; Piccioni MG; Muzii L; Benedetti Panici P
Oncology; 2020; 98(9):603-611. PubMed ID: 32492692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of elastography based on transvaginal ultrasound and MRI in assessing parametrial invasion of cervical cancer.
Ma X; Li Q; Wang JL; Shao J; Zhu YC; Ding W; Zhang HS; Wang HY; Shen JK
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 28211804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Common Spinal Intramedullary Tumours: Ependymoma and Astrocytoma.
Sultana N; Jabeen S; Rima S; Nag UK; Sarkar SK
Mymensingh Med J; 2023 Jul; 32(3):749-756. PubMed ID: 37391969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Agreement of two-dimensional and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of parametrial infiltration in cervical cancer.
Chiappa V; Di Legge A; Valentini AL; Gui B; Miccò M; Ludovisi M; Giansiracusa C; Testa AC; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 45(4):459-69. PubMed ID: 25091827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of incorporating Magnetic Resonance Imaging in FIGO Staging of Primary Carcinoma Cervix: Experience from a tertiary cancer center.
Mohan N; V J; Prahladan A; K R
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol; 2022 Aug; 18(4):465-472. PubMed ID: 34818450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Parametrial involvement in FIGO stage IB1 cervical carcinoma diagnostic impact of tumor diameter in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.
Kamimori T; Sakamoto K; Fujiwara K; Umayahara K; Sugiyama Y; Utsugi K; Takeshima N; Tanaka H; Gomi N; Takizawa K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Feb; 21(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 21721193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Staging of cervical cancer: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and pelvic examination under anesthesia.
Ho CM; Chien TY; Jeng CM; Tsang YM; Shih BY; Chang SC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1992 Oct; 91(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 1362678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients.
Hancke K; Heilmann V; Straka P; Kreienberg R; Kurzeder C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2856-61. PubMed ID: 18696156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Uterine cervical malignancy: diagnostic accuracy of MRI with histopathologic correlation.
Shweel MA; Abdel-Gawad EA; Abdel-Gawad EA; Abdelghany HS; Abdel-Rahman AM; Ibrahim EM
J Clin Imaging Sci; 2012; 2():42. PubMed ID: 22919556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Staging of cervical carcinomas. Comparison of body-coil magnetic resonance imaging and endorectal surface coil magnetic resonance imaging with histopathologic correlation.
Preidler KW; Tamussino K; Szolar DM; Ranner G; Ebner F
Invest Radiol; 1996 Jul; 31(7):458-62. PubMed ID: 8818786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance imaging of cervical carcinoma using an endorectal surface coil.
Brocker KA; Alt CD; Gebauer G; Sohn C; Hallscheidt P
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1030-1035. PubMed ID: 24794864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The correlation of preoperative CT, MR imaging, and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings in primary cervical carcinoma.
Ozsarlak O; Tjalma W; Schepens E; Corthouts B; Op de Beeck B; Van Marck E; Parizel PM; De Schepper AM
Eur Radiol; 2003 Oct; 13(10):2338-45. PubMed ID: 12802611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MRI Evaluation of Local Extent of Carcinoma Cervix - Is Post Contrast Imaging Needed in Every Case?
Kumar JU; Reddy RH; Sinha P; Kodali N; Sreekanth V
J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 May; 11(5):TC15-TC18. PubMed ID: 28658872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The performance of magnetic resonance imaging in early cervical carcinoma: a long-term experience.
Sahdev A; Sohaib SA; Wenaden AE; Shepherd JH; Reznek RH
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2007; 17(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 17309561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Value of magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma according to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2009) staging criteria].
Du L; Lei Y; Li D; Qiu X; Liang B
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2012 Jun; 32(7):1048-51. PubMed ID: 22820597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of magnetic resonance imaging with an endovaginal receiver coil in the pre-operative assessment of Stage I and IIa cervical neoplasia.
deSouza NM; McIndoe GA; Soutter WP; Krausz T; Chui KM; Hughes C; Mason WP
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 May; 105(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 9637118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
