214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34605716)
1. Prosodic Disambiguation in First and Second Language Production: English and Korean.
Baek H
Lang Speech; 2022 Sep; 65(3):598-624. PubMed ID: 34605716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prosodic cue weighting in the processing of ambiguous sentences by native English listeners and Korean listeners of English.
Baek H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Jan; 151(1):158. PubMed ID: 35105020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acoustic characteristics of Korean-English bilingual speakers' /l/ and the relationship to their foreign accent ratings.
Chung H; Kim Y
J Commun Disord; 2021; 94():106157. PubMed ID: 34653724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Phonetic Encoding of Coda Voicing Contrast under Different Focus Conditions in L1 vs. L2 English.
Choi J; Kim S; Cho T
Front Psychol; 2016; 7():624. PubMed ID: 27242571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Production of lexical stress in non-native speakers of American English: kinematic correlates of stress and transfer.
Chakraborty R; Goffman L
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):821-35. PubMed ID: 21106699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of lexical characteristics and talker accent on the recognition of English words by native speakers of Korean.
Choi MK; Holliday JJ; Munson B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Aug; 150(2):769. PubMed ID: 34470323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of age on the acquisition of second language prosody.
Huang BH; Jun SA
Lang Speech; 2011 Sep; 54(Pt 3):387-414. PubMed ID: 22070045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prosodic Structural Effects on Non-Contrastive Coarticulatory Vowel Nasalization in L2 English by Korean Learners.
Jang J; Kim S; Cho T
Lang Speech; 2023 Jun; 66(2):381-411. PubMed ID: 35831993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of L1 prosody on segmental contrast in L2: The case of English stop voicing contrast produced by Korean speakers.
Choi J; Kim S; Cho T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):EL76-82. PubMed ID: 27036291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experience with a second language affects the use of fundamental frequency in speech segmentation.
Tremblay A; Namjoshi J; Spinelli E; Broersma M; Cho T; Kim S; Martínez-García MT; Connell K
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181709. PubMed ID: 28738093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Production of coda voicing contrast of L2 English by native Mandarin Chinese speakers in comparison with native Korean speakers.
Du Z; Kim S; Cho T
JASA Express Lett; 2022 Aug; 2(8):. PubMed ID: 37311194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prosodic boundary information modulates phonetic categorization.
Kim S; Cho T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL19-25. PubMed ID: 23862901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fluency-related Temporal Features and Syllable Prominence as Prosodic Proficiency Predictors for Learners of English with Different Language Backgrounds.
Kallio H; Suni A; Šimko J
Lang Speech; 2022 Sep; 65(3):571-597. PubMed ID: 34479458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intonational differences between L1 and L2 english in South Africa.
Swerts M; Zerbian S
Phonetica; 2010; 67(3):127-46. PubMed ID: 20926913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cross-linguistic differences in prosodic cues to syntactic disambiguation in German and English.
O'Brien MG; Jackson CN; Gardner CE
Appl Psycholinguist; 2014 Jan; 35(1):27-70. PubMed ID: 24453383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing non-native and native speech: Are L2 productions more variable?
Xie X; Jaeger TF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 May; 147(5):3322. PubMed ID: 32486781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monitoring speech production and comprehension: Where is the second-language delay?
Broos WP; Duyck W; Hartsuiker RJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jul; 72(7):1601-1619. PubMed ID: 30270750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
Pinet M; Iverson P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The acoustic realization of language-specific phonological categories despite dynamic cross-linguistic influence in bilingual and trilingual speech.
Amengual M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Feb; 149(2):1271. PubMed ID: 33639831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Subcortical Involvement in Formulaic Language: Studies on Bilingual Individuals With Parkinson's Disease.
Lee B; Van Lancker Sidtis D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Dec; 63(12):4029-4045. PubMed ID: 33141624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
