BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34605792)

  • 1. Reply: The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review.
    Faulkner HR; Austen WG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Nov; 148(5):842e-843e. PubMed ID: 34605792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reply: The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review.
    Faulkner HR; Austen WG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Sep; 148(3):490e. PubMed ID: 34323870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review.
    Zhang Z; Xin M
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Sep; 148(3):489e-490e. PubMed ID: 34313647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review.
    Li H; Mu D
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Nov; 148(5):842e. PubMed ID: 34605794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. TIGR matrix for implant-based breast reconstruction - a long-term resorbable mesh.
    Cuffolo G; Holford NC; Contractor K; Tenovici A
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2018 Sep; 15(9):689-691. PubMed ID: 30139282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Commentary on: Assessment of Conflicts of Interest in Studies of Breast Implants and Breast Implant Mesh.
    Oppikofer C
    Aesthet Surg J; 2021 Oct; 41(11):1276-1278. PubMed ID: 33765109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Commentary on: Synthetic Reabsorbable Mesh (GalaFLEX) as Soft Tissues Adjunct in Breast Augmentation Revisional Surgery.
    Culver AJ
    Aesthet Surg J; 2023 Apr; 43(5):567-568. PubMed ID: 36624083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Skin-Reducing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction With Submuscular-Dermal-Mesh Pocket.
    Bonomi S; Sala L; Gennaro M; Ricci C; Cortinovis U
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jan; 82(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 30247191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. First-year complications after immediate breast reconstruction with a biological and a synthetic mesh in the same patient: A randomized controlled study.
    Hansson E; Edvinsson AC; Elander A; Kölby L; Hallberg H
    J Surg Oncol; 2021 Jan; 123(1):80-88. PubMed ID: 33051871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving the Use of Surgical Gloves as an Implant Sizer During Breast Augmentation.
    Barbosa MVJ; Nahas FX; de Arimatéia Mendes J; Ferreira LM
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Aug; 45(4):1955-1956. PubMed ID: 33559095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beyond biologics: absorbable mesh as a low-cost, low-complication sling for implant-based breast reconstruction.
    Tessler O; Reish RG; Maman DY; Smith BL; Austen WG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Feb; 133(2):90e-99e. PubMed ID: 24469217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Commentary on: Stopping Traffic: An Analysis of the Number of Scrubbed Personnel and Infection in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
    Thompson PW
    Aesthet Surg J; 2023 Sep; 43(10):1148-1149. PubMed ID: 37066823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Acellular dermal matrix and synthetic mesh in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: Current concepts].
    Billon R; Hersant B; Bosc R; Meningaud JP
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2019 Mar; 47(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 30738819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implant-based breast reconstruction with meshes and matrices: biological vs synthetic.
    Jacobs JM; Salzberg CA
    Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2015 Apr; 76(4):211-6. PubMed ID: 25853352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of synthetic mesh in reconstructive, revision, and cosmetic breast surgery.
    Becker H; Lind JG
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Oct; 37(5):914-21. PubMed ID: 23860816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beyond biologics: absorbable mesh as a low-cost, low-complication sling for implant-based breast reconstruction.
    Loustau HD; Mayer HF
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Aug; 134(2):323e-324e. PubMed ID: 25068354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Splitting the Difference: Using Synthetic and Biologic Mesh to Decrease Cost in Prepectoral Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction.
    Karp NS; Salibian AA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 147(3):580-584. PubMed ID: 33620924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subcutaneous implant breast reconstruction: Time to reconsider?
    Tasoulis MK; Iqbal FM; Cawthorn S; MacNeill F; Vidya R
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1636-1646. PubMed ID: 28528191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risks and benefits of using an absorbable mesh in one-stage immediate breast reconstruction: a comparative study.
    Ganz OM; Tobalem M; Perneger T; Lam T; Modarressi A; Elias B; Pittet B
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Mar; 135(3):498e-507e. PubMed ID: 25719714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Breast reconstruction after mastectomy and breast implants. Current status in the USA].
    Bostwick J
    Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 1997 Apr; 42(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 9768143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.