These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34608739)

  • 1. Influence of adjacent teeth on the accuracy of intraoral scanning systems for class II inlay preparation.
    Kim JH; Son SA; Lee H; Yoo YJ; Hong SJ; Park JK
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jul; 34(5):826-832. PubMed ID: 34608739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro analysis of intraoral digital impression of inlay preparation according to tooth location and cavity type.
    Kim JH; Son SA; Lee H; Kim RJ; Park JK
    J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Aug; 65(3):400-406. PubMed ID: 33116030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trueness and precision of complete arch dentate digital models produced by intraoral and desktop scanners: An ex-vivo study.
    Vag J; Stevens CD; Badahman MH; Ludlow M; Sharp M; Brenes C; Mennito A; Renne W
    J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104764. PubMed ID: 37898433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Local accuracy of actual intraoral scanning systems for single-tooth preparations in vitro.
    Zimmermann M; Ender A; Mehl A
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2020 Feb; 151(2):127-135. PubMed ID: 31883705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Influence of trueness for local finish lines of a full crown preparation on that of complete finish line].
    Jiang N; Bao XD; Yue L
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Sep; 53(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 33550343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study.
    Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Kourakis G; Pavlakis E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 31870614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro.
    Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of different inlay configurations and distance from the adjacent tooth on the accuracy of an intraoral scan.
    Son SA; Kim JH; Seo DG; Park JK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):680-687. PubMed ID: 33712313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study.
    Diker B; Tak Ö
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative reproducibility analysis of 6 intraoral scanners used on complex intracoronal preparations.
    Park JM; Kim RJ; Lee KW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 31027953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Accuracy of three intraoral scans for primary impressions of edentulous jaws].
    Cao Y; Chen JK; Deng KH; Wang Y; Sun YC; Zhao YJ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Feb; 52(1):129-137. PubMed ID: 32071476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of preparation type on the accuracy of different intraoral scanners: An in vitro study at different levels of accuracy evaluation.
    Abduo J; Laskey D
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Dec; 34(8):1221-1229. PubMed ID: 36415928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of Different Intraoral Scanners on the Accuracy of Bite Registration in Edentulous Maxillary and Mandibular Arches.
    Rutkūnas V; Jegelevičius D; Gedrimienė A; Auškalnis L; Eyüboğlu TF; Özcan M; Husain NA; Akulauskas M; Pletkus J
    J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105050. PubMed ID: 38735468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans.
    Ochoa-López G; Cascos R; Antonaya-Martín JL; Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M
    J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104138. PubMed ID: 35461973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of Different Preparation Depths for an Inlay-Retained Fixed Partial Denture on the Accuracy of Different Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study.
    Khaled M; Sabet A; Ebeid K; Salah T
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Aug; 31(7):601-605. PubMed ID: 34837276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner according to different inlay preparation designs.
    Park Y; Kim JH; Park JK; Son SA
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):515. PubMed ID: 37488581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital intraoral scanner devices: a validation study based on common evaluation criteria.
    Róth I; Czigola A; Fehér D; Vitai V; Joós-Kovács GL; Hermann P; Borbély J; Vecsei B
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Apr; 22(1):140. PubMed ID: 35473932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of three digital scanning methods for complete-arch tooth preparation: An in vitro comparison.
    Gao H; Liu X; Liu M; Yang X; Tan J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1001-1008. PubMed ID: 33736864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of additional reference objects on accuracy of five intraoral scanners in partially and completely edentulous jaws: An in vitro study.
    Rutkūnas V; Gedrimienė A; Al-Haj Husain N; Pletkus J; Barauskis D; Jegelevičius D; Özcan M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):111-118. PubMed ID: 34799084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of different span lengths with different total occlusal convergences on the accuracy of intraoral scanners.
    Yehia A; Abo El Fadl A; El Sergany O; Ebeid K
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Mar; 33(3):252-258. PubMed ID: 36988154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.