These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34608858)

  • 21. Comparison of Polysomnography, Single-Channel Electroencephalogram, Fitbit, and Sleep Logs in Patients With Psychiatric Disorders: Cross-Sectional Study.
    Kawai K; Iwamoto K; Miyata S; Okada I; Fujishiro H; Noda A; Nakagome K; Ozaki N; Ikeda M
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Dec; 25():e51336. PubMed ID: 38090797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluating Accuracy in Five Commercial Sleep-Tracking Devices Compared to Research-Grade Actigraphy and Polysomnography.
    Kainec KA; Caccavaro J; Barnes M; Hoff C; Berlin A; Spencer RMC
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jan; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 38276327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Validity of a New Consumer-Targeted Wrist Device in Sleep Measurement: An Overnight Comparison Against Polysomnography in Children and Adolescents.
    Pesonen AK; Kuula L
    J Clin Sleep Med; 2018 Apr; 14(4):585-591. PubMed ID: 29609722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Selecting a sleep tracker from EEG-based, iteratively improved, low-cost multisensor, and actigraphy-only devices.
    Ong JL; Golkashani HA; Ghorbani S; Wong KF; Chee NIYN; Willoughby AR; Chee MWL
    Sleep Health; 2024 Feb; 10(1):9-23. PubMed ID: 38087674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sleep Validity of a Non-Contact Bedside Movement and Respiration-Sensing Device.
    Schade MM; Bauer CE; Murray BR; Gahan L; Doheny EP; Kilroy H; Zaffaroni A; Montgomery-Downs HE
    J Clin Sleep Med; 2019 Jul; 15(7):1051-1061. PubMed ID: 31383243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sleep Parameter Assessment Accuracy of a Consumer Home Sleep Monitoring Ballistocardiograph Beddit Sleep Tracker: A Validation Study.
    Tuominen J; Peltola K; Saaresranta T; Valli K
    J Clin Sleep Med; 2019 Mar; 15(3):483-487. PubMed ID: 30853052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of Commercial Wrist-Based and Smartphone Accelerometers, Actigraphy, and PSG in a Clinical Cohort of Children and Adolescents.
    Toon E; Davey MJ; Hollis SL; Nixon GM; Horne RS; Biggs SN
    J Clin Sleep Med; 2016 Mar; 12(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 26446248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of 7 versus 14 days wrist actigraphy monitoring in a sleep disorders clinic population.
    Briscoe S; Hardy E; Pengo MF; Kosky C; Williams AJ; Hart N; Steier J
    Chronobiol Int; 2014 Apr; 31(3):356-62. PubMed ID: 24304408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The wrist is not the brain: Estimation of sleep by clinical and consumer wearable actigraphy devices is impacted by multiple patient- and device-specific factors.
    Danzig R; Wang M; Shah A; Trotti LM
    J Sleep Res; 2020 Feb; 29(1):e12926. PubMed ID: 31621129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Validating actigraphy as a measure of sleep for preschool children.
    Bélanger MÈ; Bernier A; Paquet J; Simard V; Carrier J
    J Clin Sleep Med; 2013 Jul; 9(7):701-6. PubMed ID: 23853565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of a device-agnostic approach to predict sleep from raw accelerometry data collected by Apple Watch Series 7, Garmin Vivoactive 4, and ActiGraph GT9X Link in children with sleep disruptions.
    Weaver RG; de Zambotti M; White J; Finnegan O; Nelakuditi S; Zhu X; Burkart S; Beets M; Brown D; Pate RR; Welk GJ; Ghosal R; Wang Y; Armstrong B; Adams EL; Reesor-Oyer L; Pfledderer C; Dugger R; Bastyr M; von Klinggraeff L; Parker H
    Sleep Health; 2023 Aug; 9(4):417-429. PubMed ID: 37391280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Software thresholds alter the bias of actigraphy for monitoring sleep in team-sport athletes.
    Fuller KL; Juliff L; Gore CJ; Peiffer JJ; Halson SL
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Aug; 20(8):756-760. PubMed ID: 28189461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Utility of the Fitbit Flex to evaluate sleep in major depressive disorder: A comparison against polysomnography and wrist-worn actigraphy.
    Cook JD; Prairie ML; Plante DT
    J Affect Disord; 2017 Aug; 217():299-305. PubMed ID: 28448949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Performance evaluation of Fitbit Charge 3 and actigraphy vs. polysomnography: Sensitivity, specificity, and reliability across participants and nights.
    Eylon G; Tikotzky L; Dinstein I
    Sleep Health; 2023 Aug; 9(4):407-416. PubMed ID: 37270397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validity and reliability of the Oura Ring Generation 3 (Gen3) with Oura sleep staging algorithm 2.0 (OSSA 2.0) when compared to multi-night ambulatory polysomnography: A validation study of 96 participants and 421,045 epochs.
    Svensson T; Madhawa K; Nt H; Chung UI; Svensson AK
    Sleep Med; 2024 Mar; 115():251-263. PubMed ID: 38382312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Automatic sleep/wake scoring from body motion in bed: validation of a newly developed sensor placed under a mattress.
    Kogure T; Shirakawa S; Shimokawa M; Hosokawa Y
    J Physiol Anthropol; 2011; 30(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 21636953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Actigraphy-based sleep estimation in adolescents and adults: a comparison with polysomnography using two scoring algorithms.
    Quante M; Kaplan ER; Cailler M; Rueschman M; Wang R; Weng J; Taveras EM; Redline S
    Nat Sci Sleep; 2018; 10():13-20. PubMed ID: 29403321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Discordant sleep parameters among actigraphy, polysomnography, and perceived sleep in patients with sleep-disordered breathing in comparison with patients with chronic insomnia disorder.
    Choi SJ; Kang M; Sung MJ; Joo EY
    Sleep Breath; 2017 Dec; 21(4):837-843. PubMed ID: 28612268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Performance of Four Commercial Wearable Sleep-Tracking Devices Tested Under Unrestricted Conditions at Home in Healthy Young Adults.
    Chinoy ED; Cuellar JA; Jameson JT; Markwald RR
    Nat Sci Sleep; 2022; 14():493-516. PubMed ID: 35345630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparing GENEActiv against Actiwatch-2 over Seven Nights Using a Common Sleep Scoring Algorithm and Device-Specific Wake Thresholds.
    Jenkins CA; Tiley LCF; Lay I; Hartmann JA; Chan JKM; Nicholas CL
    Behav Sleep Med; 2022; 20(4):369-379. PubMed ID: 34096407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.