These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3460901)
41. The reduction of x-ray exposure in dental practice using rare-earth screen--fast film combinations. Greig DG Br Dent J; 1983 Jul; 155(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 6577879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Use of E-speed film with added filtration. Ponce AZ; McDavid WD; Underhill TE; Morris CR Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Mar; 61(3):297-9. PubMed ID: 3458135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A comparative study of radiation doses received from constant direct current and conventional self-rectified panoramic dental x-ray equipment. Forest D; Deschamps M; Normandeau L J Dent Que; 1981; 18():9-17. PubMed ID: 6945322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. [Radiologic exposure of the dental patient: comparison of the doses delivered by different techniques]. Jones P; Reychler H; Engels H; Wambersie A Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2007; 62(1):4-24. PubMed ID: 18506961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Importance of rare earth screens for optimizing radiographic imaging quality]. Keller U Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1986 Jan; 41(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 3460773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. [Are additional filters made of niobium superior to the copper filter in dental radiology?]. Cordt I; Engelke W Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1990; 100(10):1160-3. PubMed ID: 2237349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A study of the zone of sharpness of three panoramic x-ray machines and the effect of screen speed on the sharpness zone. Hassen SM; Manson-Hing LR Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Aug; 54(2):242-9. PubMed ID: 6956841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Thyroid dose distribution in dental radiography. Bristow RG; Wood RE; Clark GM Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Oct; 68(4):482-7. PubMed ID: 2797745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Direct digital radiography in the dental office. Wenzel A; Gröndahl HG Int Dent J; 1995 Feb; 45(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 7607741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A study of the focal troughs of three panoramic dental x-ray machines. Part II. Image dimensions. Manson-Hing LR; Lund TM Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1975 Apr; 39(4):647-53. PubMed ID: 1054473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. A comparison of the diagnostic utility of two image receptors for panoramic radiography. Carmichael FA; Hirschmann PN; Scaife B; Sheard L; Mackenzie A Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 10654038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The radiation burden in high resolution panoramic radiography. The fanned exposure pattern and integral absorbed dose in free focus radiography. Jensen TW Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1984; 13(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 6586592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. [Radiation load of patients and professional personnel during pantomography with Cranex DC x-ray machine]. Taschner P; Rother U; Landeck E; Tetzlaff W; Edelmann BU Stomatol DDR; 1984 May; 34(5):298-302. PubMed ID: 6591583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Impact of rare earth element added filters on the X-ray beam spectra: a Monte Carlo approach. Eskandarlou A; Jafari AA; Mohammadi M; Zehtabian M; Faghihi R; Shokri A; Pourolajal J J Xray Sci Technol; 2014; 22(4):459-70. PubMed ID: 25080114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The effect of thin K-edge filters on the image quality of D- and E-speed dental film. MacDonald-Jankowski DS; Lawinski CP; Payne M Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 8593903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]