BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34610614)

  • 1. Comparison of Radiation Exposure Between Anterior, Lateral, and Posterior Interbody Fusion Techniques and the Influence of Patient and Procedural Factors.
    Striano BM; Xiong GX; Lightsey HM; Crawford AM; Pisano AJ; Schoenfeld AJ; Simpson AK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Dec; 46(23):1669-1675. PubMed ID: 34610614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of interbody approach and lumbar level on segmental, adjacent, and sagittal alignment in degenerative lumbar pathology: a radiographic analysis six months following surgery.
    O'Connor B; Drolet CE; Leveque JA; Nemani V; Krause KL; Dorsi M; Schroerlucke S; Shen J; Louie PK
    Spine J; 2022 Aug; 22(8):1318-1324. PubMed ID: 35351666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Approach-based Comparative and Predictor Analysis of 30-day Readmission, Reoperation, and Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the ACS-NSQIP Dataset.
    Katz AD; Mancini N; Karukonda T; Greenwood M; Cote M; Moss IL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Mar; 44(6):432-441. PubMed ID: 30138253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion.
    Ahlquist S; Park HY; Gatto J; Shamie AN; Park DY
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 29631061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The feasibility of computer-assisted 3D navigation in multiple-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion in combination with posterior instrumentation for adult spinal deformity.
    Strong MJ; Yee TJ; Khalsa SSS; Saadeh YS; Swong KN; Kashlan ON; Szerlip NJ; Park P; Oppenlander ME
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E4. PubMed ID: 32871568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single position lateral decubitus anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and posterior fusion reduces complications and improves perioperative outcomes compared with traditional anterior-posterior lumbar fusion.
    Ashayeri K; Leon C; Tigchelaar S; Fatemi P; Follett M; Cheng I; Thomas JA; Medley M; Braly B; Kwon B; Eisen L; Protopsaltis TS; Buckland AJ
    Spine J; 2022 Mar; 22(3):419-428. PubMed ID: 34600110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally invasive anterior and lateral transpsoas approaches for closed reduction of grade II spondylolisthesis: initial clinical and radiographic experience.
    Xu DS; Bach K; Uribe JS
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E4. PubMed ID: 29290134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variability and contributions to cost associated with anterior versus posterior approaches to lumbar interbody fusion.
    Crawford AM; Lightsey HM; Xiong GX; Striano BM; Pisano AJ; Schoenfeld AJ; Simpson AK
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2021 Jul; 206():106688. PubMed ID: 34015696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Impact of Surgical Approach on Sagittal Plane Alignment in Patients Undergoing One- or Two- Level Fusions for Degenerative Pathology: A Multicenter Radiographic Evaluation 6 Months Following Surgery.
    Leveque JA; Drolet CE; Nemani V; Krause KL; Shen J; Rathore A; Baig Y; Louie PK
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e311-e317. PubMed ID: 35490888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative analysis of 3 surgical strategies for adult spinal deformity with mild to moderate sagittal imbalance.
    Bae J; Theologis AA; Strom R; Tay B; Burch S; Berven S; Mummaneni PV; Chou D; Ames CP; Deviren V
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jan; 28(1):40-49. PubMed ID: 29087808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion in revision surgery for restenosis after posterior decompression.
    Kudo Y; Okano I; Toyone T; Matsuoka A; Maruyama H; Yamamura R; Ishikawa K; Hayakawa C; Tani S; Sekimizu M; Hoshino Y; Ozawa T; Shirahata T; Fujita M; Oshita Y; Emori H; Omata H; Inagaki K
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E11. PubMed ID: 32871574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does interbody cage lordosis impact actual segmental lordosis achieved in minimally invasive lumbar spine fusion?
    Lovecchio FC; Vaishnav AS; Steinhaus ME; Othman YA; Gang CH; Iyer S; McAnany SJ; Albert TJ; Qureshi SA
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E17. PubMed ID: 32871566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Longitudinal Trends of Patient Demographics and Morbidity of Different Approaches in Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Analysis Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Oezel L; Okano I; Hughes AP; Sarin M; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Soffin EM
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e183-e193. PubMed ID: 35472646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis of L4-L5.
    Jang HD; Lee JC; Seo JH; Roh YH; Choi SW; Shin BJ
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Feb; 158():e10-e18. PubMed ID: 34637941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation.
    Wang MY; Vasudevan R; Mindea SA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 25303619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single position circumferential fusion improves operative efficiency, reduces complications and length of stay compared with traditional circumferential fusion.
    Buckland AJ; Ashayeri K; Leon C; Manning J; Eisen L; Medley M; Protopsaltis TS; Thomas JA
    Spine J; 2021 May; 21(5):810-820. PubMed ID: 33197616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases.
    Rodgers WB; Gerber EJ; Patterson J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jan; 36(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 21192221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of lumbar interbody fusion surgery on postoperative outcomes in patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation: Analysis of the US national inpatient sample.
    Ye YP; Hu JW; Zhang YG; Xu H
    J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Dec; 70():20-26. PubMed ID: 31630917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro comparison of endplate preparation between four mini-open interbody fusion approaches.
    Tatsumi R; Lee YP; Khajavi K; Taylor W; Chen F; Bae H
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Apr; 24 Suppl 3():372-7. PubMed ID: 25874742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion in the elderly: a 10-year experience.
    Agarwal N; Faramand A; Alan N; Tempel ZJ; Hamilton DK; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 29(5):525-529. PubMed ID: 30052150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.