BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34610614)

  • 21. A meta-analysis comparing ALIF, PLIF, TLIF and LLIF.
    Teng I; Han J; Phan K; Mobbs R
    J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 44():11-17. PubMed ID: 28676316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Correction of severe spinopelvic mismatch: decreased blood loss with lateral hyperlordotic interbody grafts as compared with pedicle subtraction osteotomy.
    Leveque JC; Yanamadala V; Buchlak QD; Sethi RK
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E15. PubMed ID: 28760028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of complications, costs, and length of stay of three different lumbar interbody fusion techniques: an analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database.
    Goz V; Weinreb JH; Schwab F; Lafage V; Errico TJ
    Spine J; 2014 Sep; 14(9):2019-27. PubMed ID: 24333459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Facet Joint Fixation and Anterior, Direct Lateral, and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusions for Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Disc Diseases: Retrospective Cohort Study of a New Minimally Invasive Technique.
    Belykh E; Kalinin AA; Martirosyan NL; Kerimbayev T; Theodore N; Preul MC; Byvaltsev VA
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 114():e959-e968. PubMed ID: 29588241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Evolution of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Journey from Past to Present.
    Wong AXJ; Tang DH; Kaliya-Perumal AK; Oh JY
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Feb; 60(3):. PubMed ID: 38541104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of serum markers for muscle damage, surgical blood loss, postoperative recovery, and surgical site pain after extreme lateral interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws or traditional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Ohba T; Ebata S; Haro H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Oct; 18(1):415. PubMed ID: 29037186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation at L5/S1.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Ribot MA; Parsons AW; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jan; 157():e111-e122. PubMed ID: 34610449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Preliminary results of anterior lumbar interbody fusion, anterior column realignment for the treatment of sagittal malalignment.
    Hosseini P; Mundis GM; Eastlack RK; Bagheri R; Vargas E; Tran S; Akbarnia BA
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E6. PubMed ID: 29191100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Decreasing Radiation Emission in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Using Ultra-Low-Radiation Imaging with Image Enhancement: A Prospective Cohort Study.
    Godzik J; Nayar G; Hunter WD; Tumialán LM
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():e805-e811. PubMed ID: 30391598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Radiographic Comparison of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Traditional Fusion Approaches: Analysis of Sagittal Contour Change.
    Sembrano JN; Yson SC; Horazdovsky RD; Santos ER; Polly DW
    Int J Spine Surg; 2015; 9():16. PubMed ID: 26114085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of Outcomes of Anterior, Posterior, and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery at a Single Lumbar Level with Degenerative Spinal Disease.
    Lee N; Kim KN; Yi S; Ha Y; Shin DA; Yoon DH; Kim KS
    World Neurosurg; 2017 May; 101():216-226. PubMed ID: 28189865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Minimally Invasive Deformity Correction Technique: Initial Case Series of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 for Multilevel Lumbar Interbody Fusion in a Lateral Decubitus Position.
    Singh S; McCloskey K; Ahmad HS; Turlip R; Ghenbot Y; Sinha S; Yoon JW
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 162():e416-e426. PubMed ID: 35283360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Which Approach Is Advantageous to Preventing Development of Adjacent Segment Disease? Comparative Analysis of 3 Different Lumbar Interbody Fusion Techniques (ALIF, LLIF, and PLIF) in L4-5 Spondylolisthesis.
    Lee CW; Yoon KJ; Ha SS
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Sep; 105():612-622. PubMed ID: 28602928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.
    Theologis AA; Mundis GM; Nguyen S; Okonkwo DO; Mummaneni PV; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Fessler R; Bess S; Schwab F; Diebo BG; Burton D; Hart R; Deviren V; Ames C;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):208-219. PubMed ID: 27767682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Biomechanical evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion with secondary augmentation.
    Reis MT; Reyes PM; Bse ; Altun I; Newcomb AG; Singh V; Chang SW; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):720-726. PubMed ID: 27391398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The cost-effectiveness of interbody fusions versus posterolateral fusions in 137 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Bydon M; Macki M; Abt NB; Witham TF; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A; Sciubba DM
    Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3):492-8. PubMed ID: 25463402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Expandable Cage Technology-Transforaminal, Anterior, and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Macki M; Hamilton T; Haddad YW; Chang V
    Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2021 Jun; 21(Suppl 1):S69-S80. PubMed ID: 34128070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of Anterior Approach and Posterior Approach to Instrumented Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: A Meta-analysis.
    Cho JY; Goh TS; Son SM; Kim DS; Lee JS
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Sep; 129():e286-e293. PubMed ID: 31129223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of complication rates of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of the literature.
    Joseph JR; Smith BW; La Marca F; Park P
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Oct; 39(4):E4. PubMed ID: 26424344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Minimally invasive anterior, lateral, and oblique lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review.
    Xu DS; Walker CT; Godzik J; Turner JD; Smith W; Uribe JS
    Ann Transl Med; 2018 Mar; 6(6):104. PubMed ID: 29707553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.