These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34610683)

  • 1. Do the newly proposed realignment targets for C2 and T1 slope bridge the gap between radiographic and clinical success in corrective surgery for adult cervical deformity?
    Passfall L; Williamson TK; Krol O; Lebovic J; Imbo B; Joujon-Roche R; Tretiakov P; Dangas K; Owusu-Sarpong S; Koller H; Schoenfeld AJ; Diebo BG; Vira S; Lafage R; Lafage V; Passias PG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Sep; 37(3):368-375. PubMed ID: 35426823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Applicability of cervical sagittal vertical axis, cervical lordosis, and T1 slope on pain and disability outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in patients without deformity.
    Lau D; DiGiorgio AM; Chan AK; Dalle Ore CL; Virk MS; Chou D; Bisson EF; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Oct; 32(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 31628295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Establishing the minimum clinically important difference in Neck Disability Index and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores for adult cervical deformity.
    Soroceanu A; Smith JS; Lau D; Kelly MP; Passias PG; Protopsaltis TS; Gum JL; Lafage V; Kim HJ; Scheer JK; Gupta M; Mundis GM; Klineberg EO; Burton D; Bess S; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2020 May; 33(4):441-445. PubMed ID: 32470935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient-specific Cervical Deformity Corrections With Consideration of Associated Risk: Establishment of Risk Benefit Thresholds for Invasiveness Based on Deformity and Frailty Severity.
    Passias PG; Pierce KE; Williamson TK; Lebovic J; Schoenfeld AJ; Lafage R; Lafage V; Gum JL; Eastlack R; Kim HJ; Klineberg EO; Daniels AH; Protopsaltis TS; Mundis GM; Scheer JK; Park P; Chou D; Line B; Hart RA; Burton DC; Bess S; Schwab FJ; Shaffrey CI; Smith JS; Ames CP;
    Clin Spine Surg; 2024 Feb; 37(1):E43-E51. PubMed ID: 37798829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The morphology of cervical deformities: a two-step cluster analysis to identify cervical deformity patterns.
    Kim HJ; Virk S; Elysee J; Passias P; Ames C; Shaffrey CI; Mundis G; Protopsaltis T; Gupta M; Klineberg E; Smith JS; Burton D; Schwab F; Lafage V; Lafage R;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Nov; 32(3):353-359. PubMed ID: 31731275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is It Possible for Patients with Early Distal Junctional Kyphosis following Adult Cervical Deformity Corrective Surgery to Achieve Similar Outcomes to Their Unaffected Counterparts? An Analysis of Recovery Kinetics.
    Onafowokan OO; Imbo B; Williamson T; Das A; Mir JM; Galetta M; Lorentz N; Passias PG
    J Clin Med; 2024 May; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 38892957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Erratum: Reciprocal Changes Following Cervical Realignment Surgery.
    Lee JK; Hyun SJ; Yang SH; Kim KJ
    Neurospine; 2023 Sep; 20(3):1091-1092. PubMed ID: 37799001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical Impact and Correlations of Odontoid Parameters Following Multilevel Posterior Cervical Fusion Surgery.
    Lee JK; Hyun SJ; Yang SH; Kim KJ
    Neurospine; 2022 Dec; 19(4):912-920. PubMed ID: 36597628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Defining Cervical Sagittal Plane Deformity - When Are Sagittal Realignment Procedures Necessary in Patients Presenting Primarily With Radiculopathy or Myelopathy?
    Nemani VM; Louie PK; Drolet CE; Rhee JM
    Neurospine; 2022 Dec; 19(4):876-882. PubMed ID: 36597623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Classification(s) of Cervical Deformity.
    Kaidi AC; Kim HJ
    Neurospine; 2022 Dec; 19(4):862-867. PubMed ID: 36597621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Odontoid Incidence: A Novel Cervical Parameter Influencing Cervical Alignment From Top to Bottom.
    Lee JK; Hyun SJ; Kim KJ
    Neurospine; 2022 Jun; 19(2):463-471. PubMed ID: 35793937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reciprocal Changes in the Whole-Body Following Realignment Surgery in Adult Spinal Deformity.
    Lee JK; Hyun SJ; Kim KJ
    Asian Spine J; 2022 Dec; 16(6):958-967. PubMed ID: 35527534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Regional Anesthesia for Lumbar Spine Surgery: Can It Be a Standard in the Future?
    Lee JK; Park JH; Hyun SJ; Hodel D; Hausmann ON
    Neurospine; 2021 Dec; 18(4):733-740. PubMed ID: 35000326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prioritization of Realignment Associated With Superior Clinical Outcomes for Cervical Deformity Patients.
    Pierce KE; Passias PG; Brown AE; Bortz CA; Alas H; Passfall L; Krol O; Kummer N; Lafage R; Chou D; Burton DC; Line B; Klineberg E; Hart R; Gum J; Daniels A; Hamilton K; Bess S; Protopsaltis T; Shaffrey C; Schwab FA; Smith JS; Lafage V; Ames C;
    Neurospine; 2021 Sep; 18(3):506-514. PubMed ID: 34610683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prioritization of realignment associated with superior clinical outcomes for surgical cervical deformity patients.
    Pierce KE; Passias PG; Brown AE; Bortz CA; Alas H; Lafage R; Krol O; Chou D; Burton DC; Line B; Klineberg E; Hart R; Gum J; Daniels A; Hamilton K; Bess S; Protopsaltis T; Shaffrey C; Schwab FA; Smith JS; Lafage V; Ames C;
    J Craniovertebr Junction Spine; 2021; 12(3):311-317. PubMed ID: 34729000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. At What Point Should the Thoracolumbar Region Be Addressed in Patients Undergoing Corrective Cervical Deformity Surgery?
    Passias PG; Pierce KE; Naessig S; Ahmad W; Passfall L; Lafage R; Lafage V; Kim HJ; Daniels A; Eastlack R; Klineberg E; Line B; Mummaneni P; Hart R; Burton D; Bess S; Schwab F; Shaffrey C; Smith JS; Ames CP;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Oct; 46(20):E1113-E1118. PubMed ID: 34559752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting the combined occurrence of poor clinical and radiographic outcomes following cervical deformity corrective surgery.
    Horn SR; Passias PG; Oh C; Lafage V; Lafage R; Smith JS; Line B; Anand N; Segreto FA; Bortz CA; Scheer JK; Eastlack RK; Deviren V; Mummaneni PV; Daniels AH; Park P; Nunley PD; Kim HJ; Klineberg EO; Burton DC; Hart RA; Schwab FJ; Bess S; Shaffrey CI; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Nov; 32(2):182-190. PubMed ID: 31675700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What are the major drivers of outcomes in cervical deformity surgery?
    Passias PG; Pierce KE; Imbo B; Krol O; Passfall L; Tretiakov P; Moattari K; Williamson T; Joujon-Roche R; Passano B; Ahmad W; Naessig S; Diebo B
    J Craniovertebr Junction Spine; 2021; 12(4):401-405. PubMed ID: 35068823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical and spinopelvic parameters can predict patient reported outcomes following cervical deformity surgery.
    Passias PG; Pierce KE; Imbo B; Passfall L; Krol O; Joujon-Roche R; Williamson T; Moattari K; Tretiakov P; Adenwalla A; Chern I; Alas H; Bortz CA; Brown AE; Vira S; Diebo BG; Sciubba DM; Lafage R; Lafage V
    J Craniovertebr Junction Spine; 2022; 13(1):62-66. PubMed ID: 35386250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.