These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34612089)

  • 1. Development and implementation of research integrity guidance documents: Explorative interviews with research integrity experts.
    Roje R; Tomić V; Buljan I; Marušić A
    Account Res; 2023 Dec; 30(6):293-330. PubMed ID: 34612089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Practices for Research Integrity Promotion in Research Performing Organisations and Research Funding Organisations: A Scoping Review.
    Ščepanović R; Labib K; Buljan I; Tijdink J; Marušić A
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Jan; 27(1):4. PubMed ID: 33502638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stakeholders' perspectives on research integrity training practices: a qualitative study.
    Pizzolato D; Dierickx K
    BMC Med Ethics; 2021 May; 22(1):67. PubMed ID: 34049556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A study on the content of integrity policies and research integrity management in Chinese universities.
    Cao Y; Jiang Y; Zhao Y
    Front Res Metr Anal; 2023; 8():943228. PubMed ID: 36844756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How do Chinese universities address research integrity and misconduct? A review of university documents.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Dev World Bioeth; 2019 Jun; 19(2):64-75. PubMed ID: 31091553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication.
    Marusic A; Wager E; Utrobicic A; Rothstein HR; Sambunjak D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Apr; 4(4):MR000038. PubMed ID: 27040721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Important Topics for Fostering Research Integrity by Research Performing and Research Funding Organizations: A Delphi Consensus Study.
    Labib K; Roje R; Bouter L; Widdershoven G; Evans N; Marušić A; Mokkink L; Tijdink J
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Jul; 27(4):47. PubMed ID: 34244889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors influencing the promotion and implementation of research integrity in research performing and research funding organizations: A scoping review.
    Roje R; Reyes Elizondo A; Kaltenbrunner W; Buljan I; Marušić A
    Account Res; 2023 Dec; 30(8):633-671. PubMed ID: 35531936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stakeholders' Experiences of Research Integrity Support in Universities: A Qualitative Study in Three European Countries.
    Evans N; Buljan I; Valenti E; Bouter L; Marušić A; de Vries R; Widdershoven G;
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2022 Aug; 28(5):43. PubMed ID: 36042054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differing Perceptions Concerning Research Integrity Between Universities and Industry: A Qualitative Study.
    Godecharle S; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1421-1436. PubMed ID: 28913604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Research integrity guidelines and safeguards in Brazil.
    Armond ACV; Kakuk P
    Account Res; 2023 Apr; 30(3):133-149. PubMed ID: 34530667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Collecting and characterizing existing and freely accessible research integrity educational resources.
    Pizzolato D; Abdi S; Dierickx K
    Account Res; 2020 May; 27(4):195-211. PubMed ID: 32122167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptions of research integrity and the Chinese situation: In-depth interviews with Chinese biomedical researchers in Europe.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Account Res; 2019 Oct; 26(7):405-426. PubMed ID: 31379202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How researchers perceive research misconduct in biomedicine and how they would prevent it: A qualitative study in a small scientific community.
    Buljan I; Barać L; Marušić A
    Account Res; 2018; 25(4):220-238. PubMed ID: 29637796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Researchers' interpretations of research integrity: A qualitative study.
    Shaw D; Satalkar P
    Account Res; 2018; 25(2):79-93. PubMed ID: 29291621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. European Universities' Guidance on Research Integrity and Misconduct.
    Aubert Bonn N; Godecharle S; Dierickx K
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Feb; 12(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 28220725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Working with Research Integrity-Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement.
    Forsberg EM; Anthun FO; Bailey S; Birchley G; Bout H; Casonato C; Fuster GG; Heinrichs B; Horbach S; Jacobsen IS; Janssen J; Kaiser M; Lerouge I; van der Meulen B; de Rijcke S; Saretzki T; Sutrop M; Tazewell M; Varantola K; Vie KJ; Zwart H; Zöller M
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Aug; 24(4):1023-1034. PubMed ID: 29855866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Creating research ethics and integrity country report cards: Case study from Europe.
    Perković Paloš A; Roje R; Tomić V; Marušić A
    Account Res; 2024 Aug; 31(6):620-654. PubMed ID: 36635978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception and reaction of Nanyang Technological University (NTU) researchers to different forms of research integrity education modality.
    Chua JYL; Lee CSL; Yeo KP; Ali Y; Lim CL
    BMC Med Ethics; 2022 Aug; 23(1):85. PubMed ID: 36002817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.
    Xyrichis A; Iliopoulou K; Mackintosh NJ; Bench S; Terblanche M; Philippou J; Sandall J
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Feb; 2(2):CD012876. PubMed ID: 33599282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.