173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34612701)
1. Standard Sample Storage Conditions Have an Impact on Inferred Microbiome Composition and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns.
Poulsen CS; Kaas RS; Aarestrup FM; Pamp SJ
Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Oct; 9(2):e0138721. PubMed ID: 34612701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Library Preparation and Sequencing Platform Introduce Bias in Metagenomic-Based Characterizations of Microbiomes.
Poulsen CS; Ekstrøm CT; Aarestrup FM; Pamp SJ
Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Apr; 10(2):e0009022. PubMed ID: 35289669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of stool versus rectal swab samples and storage conditions on bacterial community profiles.
Bassis CM; Moore NM; Lolans K; Seekatz AM; Weinstein RA; Young VB; Hayden MK;
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):78. PubMed ID: 28359329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Methods for Improving Human Gut Microbiome Data by Reducing Variability through Sample Processing and Storage of Stool.
Gorzelak MA; Gill SK; Tasnim N; Ahmadi-Vand Z; Jay M; Gibson DL
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134802. PubMed ID: 26252519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An ambient temperature collection and stabilization strategy for canine microbiota studies.
Lin CY; Cross TL; Doukhanine E; Swanson KS
Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13383. PubMed ID: 32770113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benchmarking urine storage and collection conditions for evaluating the female urinary microbiome.
Jung CE; Chopyk J; Shin JH; Lukacz ES; Brubaker L; Schwanemann LK; Knight R; Wolfe AJ; Pride DT
Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13409. PubMed ID: 31527753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of the impact of different fecal storage protocols on the microbiota diversity and composition: a pilot study.
Moossavi S; Engen PA; Ghanbari R; Green SJ; Naqib A; Bishehsari F; Merat S; Poustchi H; Keshavarzian A; Malekzadeh R
BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):145. PubMed ID: 31253096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Sample Preservation and Storage Methods for Metaproteomics Analysis of Intestinal Microbiomes.
Mordant A; Kleiner M
Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Dec; 9(3):e0187721. PubMed ID: 34908431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An ambient-temperature storage and stabilization device performs comparably to flash-frozen collection for stool metabolomics in infants.
Ramamoorthy S; Levy S; Mohamed M; Abdelghani A; Evans AM; Miller LAD; Mehta L; Moore S; Freinkman E; Hourigan SK
BMC Microbiol; 2021 Feb; 21(1):59. PubMed ID: 33618670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sample storage conditions induce post-collection biases in microbiome profiles.
Jenkins SV; Vang KB; Gies A; Griffin RJ; Jun SR; Nookaew I; Dings RPM
BMC Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):227. PubMed ID: 30591021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of Stool Sample Preservation Methods on Gut Microbiota Biodiversity: New Original Data and Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
Li XM; Shi X; Yao Y; Shen YC; Wu XL; Cai T; Liang LX; Wang F
Microbiol Spectr; 2023 Jun; 11(3):e0429722. PubMed ID: 37093040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation.
Szopinska JW; Gresse R; van der Marel S; Boekhorst J; Lukovac S; van Swam I; Franke B; Timmerman H; Belzer C; Arias Vasquez A
BMC Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 30189859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How should we store avian faecal samples for microbiota analyses? Comparing efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
Vargas-Pellicer P; Watrobska C; Knowles S; Schroeder J; Banks-Leite C
J Microbiol Methods; 2019 Oct; 165():105689. PubMed ID: 31425715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Variations of gut microbiome composition under different preservation solutions and periods].
Duan Y; Lü N; Cai F; Zhu B
Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2020 Dec; 36(12):2525-2540. PubMed ID: 33398951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. VMG II transport medium stabilises oral microbiome samples for Next-Generation Sequencing.
Adler CJ; White A; Bockmann M; Browne GV; Townsend G; Hughes T
J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Jan; 144():91-98. PubMed ID: 29155022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterization of the fecal microbiota using high-throughput sequencing reveals a stable microbial community during storage.
Carroll IM; Ringel-Kulka T; Siddle JP; Klaenhammer TR; Ringel Y
PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e46953. PubMed ID: 23071673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ionic liquid-based reagents improve the stability of midterm fecal sample storage.
Hao L; Xia Z; Yang H; Wang J; Han M
J Microbiol Methods; 2017 Aug; 139():68-73. PubMed ID: 28506638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative diversity of microbiomes and Resistomes in beef feedlots, downstream environments and urban sewage influent.
Zaheer R; Lakin SM; Polo RO; Cook SR; Larney FJ; Morley PS; Booker CW; Hannon SJ; Van Domselaar G; Read RR; McAllister TA
BMC Microbiol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):197. PubMed ID: 31455230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic Evaluation of the Viable Microbiome in the Human Oral and Gut Samples with Spike-in Gram+/- Bacteria.
Liu F; Lu H; Dong B; Huang X; Cheng H; Qu R; Hu Y; Zhong L; Guo Z; You Y; Xu ZZ
mSystems; 2023 Apr; 8(2):e0073822. PubMed ID: 36971593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of time and temperature on gut microbiota and SCFA composition in stool samples.
Cunningham JL; Bramstång L; Singh A; Jayarathna S; Rasmusson AJ; Moazzami A; Müller B
PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236944. PubMed ID: 32745090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
