146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34613949)
1. The Accuracy of Three-Dimensional CT Scan Software in Predicting Prosthetic Utilization in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Baumgarten KM; Radtke L
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2022 Jan; 30(2):e223-e232. PubMed ID: 34613949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty yields similar results to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of humeral head avascular necrosis.
McLaughlin R; Tams C; Werthel JD; Wright TW; Crowe MM; Aibinder W; Friedman RJ; King JJ; Schoch BS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Jun; 31(6S):S94-S102. PubMed ID: 34968689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What is the deviation in 3D preoperative planning software? A systematic review of concordance between plan and actual implant in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Lilley BM; Lachance A; Peebles AM; Powell SN; Romeo AA; Denard PJ; Provencher CMT
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 May; 31(5):1073-1082. PubMed ID: 35017079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Concordance of Preoperative 3D Templating in Stemless Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Rechenmacher AJ; Goltz DE; Wickman JR; Levin JM; Schappe T; Green CL; Klifto CS; Lassiter TE; Anakwenze OA
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2022 Oct; 30(19):e1269-e1278. PubMed ID: 36027052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reduction of scapulohumeral subluxation with posterior augmented glenoid implants in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: Short-term 3D comparison between pre- and post-operative CT.
Terrier A; Goetti P; Becce F; Farron A
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2020 Jun; 106(4):681-686. PubMed ID: 32284278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is preoperative planning effective for intraoperative glenoid implant size and type selection during anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
Raiss P; Walch G; Wittmann T; Athwal GS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2123-2127. PubMed ID: 32340791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgeon acceptance of an initial 3D glenoid preoperative plan: rates and risk factors.
Hartzler RU; Denard PJ; Griffin JW; Werner BC; Romeo AA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Apr; 30(4):787-794. PubMed ID: 32650080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does long-term follow-up and monitoring of primary shoulder arthroplasty identify failing implants requiring revision?
Morris DLJ; Dover C; Walstow K; Pitt L; Morgan M; Espag MP; Clark DI; Tambe AA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 May; 33(5):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 37838180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of three-dimensional planning on decision-making in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Werner BS; Hudek R; Burkhart KJ; Gohlke F
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Aug; 26(8):1477-1483. PubMed ID: 28162884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does computerized CT-based 3D planning of the humeral head cut help to restore the anatomy of the proximal humerus after stemless total shoulder arthroplasty?
Grubhofer F; Muniz Martinez AR; Haberli J; Selig ME; Ernstbrunner L; Price MD; Warner JJP
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Jun; 30(6):e309-e316. PubMed ID: 32950671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Porous metal wedge augments to address glenoid retroversion in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: midterm update.
Sandow MJ; Tu CG
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Sep; 29(9):1821-1830. PubMed ID: 32305149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of 3-Dimensional Planning, Implant Templating, and Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Iannotti JP; Walker K; Rodriguez E; Patterson TE; Jun BJ; Ricchetti ET
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Mar; 101(5):446-457. PubMed ID: 30845039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of preoperative 3-dimensional planning and intraoperative navigation of shoulder arthroplasty on implant selection and operative time: a single surgeon's experience.
Rosenthal Y; Rettig SA; Virk MS; Zuckerman JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Dec; 29(12):2564-2570. PubMed ID: 33190756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preliminary Results of a Posterior Augmented Glenoid Compared to an all Polyethylene Standard Glenoid in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Wright TW; Grey SG; Roche CP; Wright L; Flurin PH; Zuckerman JD
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73 Suppl 1():S79-85. PubMed ID: 26631201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of Blueprint software in predicting range of motion 1 year after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Baumgarten KM
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 May; 32(5):1088-1094. PubMed ID: 36690174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle: a new measurement of glenoid inclination for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Boileau P; Gauci MO; Wagner ER; Clowez G; Chaoui J; Chelli M; Walch G
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Jul; 28(7):1281-1290. PubMed ID: 30935825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stem size prediction in shoulder arthroplasty with preoperative 3D planning.
Wittmann T; Befrui N; Rieger T; Raiss P
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Jul; 143(7):3735-3741. PubMed ID: 35963979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of glenoid wear pattern on glenoid component placement accuracy in shoulder arthroplasty.
Hao KA; Sutton CD; Wright TW; Schoch BS; Wright JO; Struk AM; Haupt ET; Leonor T; King JJ
JSES Int; 2022 Mar; 6(2):200-208. PubMed ID: 35252914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3D preoperative planning for humeral head selection in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Lima DJL; Markel J; Yawman JP; Whaley JD; Sabesan VJ
Musculoskelet Surg; 2020 Aug; 104(2):155-161. PubMed ID: 30949924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Revision Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Anatomical Glenoid Component Loosening Was Not Universally Successful: A Detailed Analysis of 127 Consecutive Shoulders.
Bartels DW; Marigi E; Sperling JW; Sanchez-Sotelo J
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 May; 103(10):879-886. PubMed ID: 33764935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]