118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34614673)
1. Color-difference evaluation for 3D objects.
Jiang L; Cui G; Melgosa M; Xiao K; Sueeprasan S
Opt Express; 2021 Jul; 29(15):24237-24254. PubMed ID: 34614673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influences of shape, size, and gloss on the perceived color difference of 3D printed objects.
Huang M; Pan J; Wang Y; Li Y; Hu X; Li X; Xiang D; Hemingray C; Xiao K
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2022 May; 39(5):916-926. PubMed ID: 36215453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimizing Parametric Factors in CIELAB and CIEDE2000 Color-Difference Formulas for 3D-Printed Spherical Objects.
He R; Xiao K; Pointer M; Melgosa M; Bressler Y
Materials (Basel); 2022 Jun; 15(12):. PubMed ID: 35744113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring color differences in automotive samples with lightness flop: a test of the AUDI2000 color-difference formula.
Melgosa M; Martínez-García J; Gómez-Robledo L; Perales E; Martínez-Verdú FM; Dauser T
Opt Express; 2014 Feb; 22(3):3458-67. PubMed ID: 24663636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimizing Color-Difference Formulas for 3D-Printed Objects.
Huang M; Gao X; Pan J; Li X; Hemingray C; Xiao K; Melgosa M
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Nov; 22(22):. PubMed ID: 36433464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chromaticity-discrimination thresholds with aperture and object colors: experimental results and predictions of some recent color-difference formulas.
Melgosa M; Perez MM; Hita E
Appl Opt; 1996 Jan; 35(1):176-87. PubMed ID: 21068996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Color-difference formula for evaluating color pairs with no separation: ΔE
Mirjalili F; Luo MR; Cui G; Morovic J
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2019 May; 36(5):789-799. PubMed ID: 31045006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Generalization of color-difference formulas for any illuminant and any observer by assuming perfect color constancy in a color-vision model based on the OSA-UCS system.
Oleari C; Melgosa M; Huertas R
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2011 Nov; 28(11):2226-34. PubMed ID: 22048289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Parametric effects on the evaluation of threshold chromaticity differences using red printed samples.
Brusola F; Tortajada I; Jordá B; Melgosa M
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2019 Apr; 36(4):510-517. PubMed ID: 31044969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Color-difference evaluation for digital images using a categorical judgment method.
Liu H; Huang M; Cui G; Luo MR; Melgosa M
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2013 Apr; 30(4):616-26. PubMed ID: 23595320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of threshold color differences using printed samples.
Huang M; Liu H; Cui G; Luo MR; Melgosa M
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2012 Jun; 29(6):883-91. PubMed ID: 22673417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Visual and instrumental shade matching using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas.
Pecho OE; Ghinea R; Alessandretti R; Pérez MM; Della Bona A
Dent Mater; 2016 Jan; 32(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 26631341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ROC study of four LCD displays under typical medical center lighting conditions.
Langer S; Fetterly K; Mandrekar J; Harmsen S; Bartholmai B; Patton C; Bishop A; McCannel C
J Digit Imaging; 2006 Mar; 19(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 16249836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of select color-difference formulas in the blue region.
Shamey R; Cao R; Tomasino T; Zaidy SS; Iqbal K; Lin J; Lee SG
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2014 Jun; 31(6):1328-36. PubMed ID: 24977373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CIE 2017 color fidelity index Rf: a better index to predict perceived color difference?
Jost S; Cauwerts C; Avouac P
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2018 Apr; 35(4):B202-B213. PubMed ID: 29603976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Power functions improving the performance of color-difference formulas.
Huang M; Cui G; Melgosa M; Sánchez-Marañón M; Li C; Luo MR; Liu H
Opt Express; 2015 Jan; 23(1):597-610. PubMed ID: 25835705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How psychophysical methods influence optimizations of color difference formulas.
Kirchner E; Dekker N; Lucassen M; Njo L; van der Lans I; Urban P; Huertas R
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2015 Mar; 32(3):357-66. PubMed ID: 26366646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relative flattening between velvet and matte 3D shapes: evidence for similar shape-from-shading computations.
Wijntjes MW; Doerschner K; Kucukoglu G; Pont SC
J Vis; 2012 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 22214564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Uniformity of some recent color metrics tested with an accurate color-difference tolerance dataset.
Melgosa M; Quesada JJ; Hita E
Appl Opt; 1994 Dec; 33(34):8069-77. PubMed ID: 20963027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of random-dot textures on perception of suprathreshold color differences.
Huertas R; Melgosa M; Hita E
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2006 Sep; 23(9):2067-76. PubMed ID: 16912733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
