BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34616768)

  • 1. Comparison of Monopolar Electrosurgical Conization and the Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure in the Management of High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion.
    Ding J; Xu H; Xia L; Cao S; Wu Q
    Front Surg; 2021; 8():721545. PubMed ID: 34616768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Clinical outcome and high risk factor for residual lesion analysis of HSIL half a year after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a clinical study of 1 502 cases].
    Liu L; Chen LM; Tao X; Dai F; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):751-756. PubMed ID: 29179270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk Factor Analysis of Persistent High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion After Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Conization.
    Chen L; Liu L; Tao X; Guo L; Zhang H; Sui L
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2019 Jan; 23(1):24-27. PubMed ID: 30371553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison study of post-operative infection analysis of cold-knife conization and loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
    Cai L; Huang Y; Lin C; Liu G; Mao X; Dong B; Lu T; Sun P
    Transl Cancer Res; 2020 Feb; 9(2):949-957. PubMed ID: 35117440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Management of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion patients with positive margin after LEEP conization: A retrospective study.
    Abdulaziz AMA; You X; Liu L; Sun Y; Zhang J; Sun S; Li X; Sun W; Dong Y; Liu H; Zhang Y
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 May; 100(20):e26030. PubMed ID: 34011112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Discussion on the diagnosis and treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in post-menopausal women].
    Cao QW; You ZX; Qian XY; Heng D; Tang MY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):393-398. PubMed ID: 31262123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Risk stratified management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ based on cone margin state].
    Huang SS; Sui L; Chen LM; Zhang HW; Tao X
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Sep; 56(9):622-629. PubMed ID: 34547863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Negative loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) following cervical biopsy diagnosis of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
    Aly FZ; Irhayyim A; Knapik J; Klein R
    Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2021; 14(12):1148-1154. PubMed ID: 35027995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Histopathological discrepancies between colposcopy-directed biopsy and LEEP-conization observed during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
    Pruski D; Przybylski M; Millert-Kalinska S; Zmaczynski A; Jach R
    Ginekol Pol; 2023; 94(1):12-18. PubMed ID: 36043301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical factors that affect diagnostic discrepancy between colposcopically directed biopsies and loop electrosurgical excision procedure conization of the uterine cervix.
    Jung Y; Lee AR; Lee SJ; Lee YS; Park DC; Park EK
    Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2018 Jul; 61(4):477-488. PubMed ID: 30018902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Specimen Fragmentation and Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure and Cold Knife Cone Biopsy Outcomes.
    Grubman J; Meinhardt SS; Nambiar A; Lea JS
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2020 Jan; 24(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 31860572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recurrent High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion After Loop Excision Procedure Versus Loop Procedure With Top Hat.
    Francoeur AA; Furey KB; Ramirez J; Klomhaus AM; Holschneider C; Garcia LM
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2023 Jul; 27(3):193-197. PubMed ID: 37285236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can We Reduce Overtreatment of Cervical High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions?
    Bradbury M; Rabasa J; Murcia MT; Dinarès MC; Sainz A; Castellet C; Pérez-Benavente A; Gil-Moreno A; Centeno C
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2022 Jan; 26(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 34928250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk factors of LEEP margin positivity and optimal length of cervical conization in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Cong Q; Yu Y; Xie Y; Li Y; Sui L
    Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1209811. PubMed ID: 37427119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recurrent Dysplasia After a Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure: Local Versus General Anesthesia.
    Tzur Y; Berkovitz-Shperling R; Laskov I; Grisaru D; Michaan N
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2022 Oct; 26(4):315-318. PubMed ID: 35997172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can we predict surgical margin positivity while performing cervical excisional procedures?
    Durmuş Y; Karalök A; Başaran D; Kamani MO; Boran N; Koç S; Turan AT
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):666-672. PubMed ID: 31482755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Large Retrospective Study of 12714 Cases of LEEP Conization Focusing on Cervical Cancer That Colposcopy-Directed Biopsy Failed to Detect.
    Cong Q; Song Y; Wang Q; Zhang H; Gao S; Du M; Xie F; Dong J; Feng H; Diao W; Zhu C; Sui L
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():5138232. PubMed ID: 29854761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are "additional cuts" effective for positive margins in cervical conization? It varies according to the doctor.
    Sun Y; He Y; Zhuoma M; Hua Z; Sun Z; Jiang N; Kong F; Xiao Z
    World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Aug; 21(1):260. PubMed ID: 37612769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the consistency ratios of cervical smear, cervical biopsy and conization results.
    Keskin N; Biyik I; Ince O; Gokten H; Simsek S; Soysal C; Erten O
    Ginekol Pol; 2021; 92(11):778-783. PubMed ID: 33914320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The accuracy of cervical cancer and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis with loop electrosurgical excisional procedure under colposcopic vision.
    Suwannarurk K; Bhamarapravati S; Thaweekul Y; Mairaing K; Poomtavorn Y; Pattaraarchachai J
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Mar; 20(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 19471663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.