109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34616768)
1. Comparison of Monopolar Electrosurgical Conization and the Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure in the Management of High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion.
Ding J; Xu H; Xia L; Cao S; Wu Q
Front Surg; 2021; 8():721545. PubMed ID: 34616768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Clinical outcome and high risk factor for residual lesion analysis of HSIL half a year after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a clinical study of 1 502 cases].
Liu L; Chen LM; Tao X; Dai F; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):751-756. PubMed ID: 29179270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk Factor Analysis of Persistent High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion After Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Conization.
Chen L; Liu L; Tao X; Guo L; Zhang H; Sui L
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2019 Jan; 23(1):24-27. PubMed ID: 30371553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison study of post-operative infection analysis of cold-knife conization and loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Cai L; Huang Y; Lin C; Liu G; Mao X; Dong B; Lu T; Sun P
Transl Cancer Res; 2020 Feb; 9(2):949-957. PubMed ID: 35117440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Management of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion patients with positive margin after LEEP conization: A retrospective study.
Abdulaziz AMA; You X; Liu L; Sun Y; Zhang J; Sun S; Li X; Sun W; Dong Y; Liu H; Zhang Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 May; 100(20):e26030. PubMed ID: 34011112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Discussion on the diagnosis and treatment of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in post-menopausal women].
Cao QW; You ZX; Qian XY; Heng D; Tang MY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):393-398. PubMed ID: 31262123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Risk stratified management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ based on cone margin state].
Huang SS; Sui L; Chen LM; Zhang HW; Tao X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Sep; 56(9):622-629. PubMed ID: 34547863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Negative loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) following cervical biopsy diagnosis of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Aly FZ; Irhayyim A; Knapik J; Klein R
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2021; 14(12):1148-1154. PubMed ID: 35027995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histopathological discrepancies between colposcopy-directed biopsy and LEEP-conization observed during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
Pruski D; Przybylski M; Millert-Kalinska S; Zmaczynski A; Jach R
Ginekol Pol; 2023; 94(1):12-18. PubMed ID: 36043301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical factors that affect diagnostic discrepancy between colposcopically directed biopsies and loop electrosurgical excision procedure conization of the uterine cervix.
Jung Y; Lee AR; Lee SJ; Lee YS; Park DC; Park EK
Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2018 Jul; 61(4):477-488. PubMed ID: 30018902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Specimen Fragmentation and Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure and Cold Knife Cone Biopsy Outcomes.
Grubman J; Meinhardt SS; Nambiar A; Lea JS
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2020 Jan; 24(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 31860572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recurrent High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion After Loop Excision Procedure Versus Loop Procedure With Top Hat.
Francoeur AA; Furey KB; Ramirez J; Klomhaus AM; Holschneider C; Garcia LM
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2023 Jul; 27(3):193-197. PubMed ID: 37285236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can We Reduce Overtreatment of Cervical High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions?
Bradbury M; Rabasa J; Murcia MT; Dinarès MC; Sainz A; Castellet C; Pérez-Benavente A; Gil-Moreno A; Centeno C
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2022 Jan; 26(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 34928250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk factors of LEEP margin positivity and optimal length of cervical conization in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Cong Q; Yu Y; Xie Y; Li Y; Sui L
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1209811. PubMed ID: 37427119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recurrent Dysplasia After a Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure: Local Versus General Anesthesia.
Tzur Y; Berkovitz-Shperling R; Laskov I; Grisaru D; Michaan N
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2022 Oct; 26(4):315-318. PubMed ID: 35997172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can we predict surgical margin positivity while performing cervical excisional procedures?
Durmuş Y; Karalök A; Başaran D; Kamani MO; Boran N; Koç S; Turan AT
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):666-672. PubMed ID: 31482755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Large Retrospective Study of 12714 Cases of LEEP Conization Focusing on Cervical Cancer That Colposcopy-Directed Biopsy Failed to Detect.
Cong Q; Song Y; Wang Q; Zhang H; Gao S; Du M; Xie F; Dong J; Feng H; Diao W; Zhu C; Sui L
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():5138232. PubMed ID: 29854761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are "additional cuts" effective for positive margins in cervical conization? It varies according to the doctor.
Sun Y; He Y; Zhuoma M; Hua Z; Sun Z; Jiang N; Kong F; Xiao Z
World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Aug; 21(1):260. PubMed ID: 37612769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the consistency ratios of cervical smear, cervical biopsy and conization results.
Keskin N; Biyik I; Ince O; Gokten H; Simsek S; Soysal C; Erten O
Ginekol Pol; 2021; 92(11):778-783. PubMed ID: 33914320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The accuracy of cervical cancer and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis with loop electrosurgical excisional procedure under colposcopic vision.
Suwannarurk K; Bhamarapravati S; Thaweekul Y; Mairaing K; Poomtavorn Y; Pattaraarchachai J
J Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Mar; 20(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 19471663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]