262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34618735)
1. The Otolaryngology Residency Program Preference Signaling Experience.
Pletcher SD; Chang CWD; Thorne MC; Malekzadeh S
Acad Med; 2022 May; 97(5):664-668. PubMed ID: 34618735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-Year Interview and Match Outcomes of Otolaryngology Preference Signaling.
Chang CWD; Thorne MC; Malekzadeh S; Pletcher SD
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Mar; 168(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 36040808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interview Invitations for Otolaryngology Residency Positions Across Demographic Groups Following Implementation of Preference Signaling.
Pletcher SD; Chang CWD; Thorne MC; Malekzadeh S; Francis CL; Naemi B; Costa J; Dunleavy D
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Mar; 6(3):e231922. PubMed ID: 36881409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Applicant Perspectives on the Otolaryngology Residency Application Process.
Ward M; Pingree C; Laury AM; Bowe SN
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Aug; 143(8):782-787. PubMed ID: 28542682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of Preference Signaling on Residency Interview Distribution Among Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Applicants.
Standiford TC; David Chang CW; Thorne MC; Malekzadeh S; Pletcher SD
J Surg Educ; 2023 Feb; 80(2):170-176. PubMed ID: 36272913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of the Standardized Interview Offer Date Initiatives: A Survey of Otolaryngology Applicants and Programs.
Standiford TC; Thorne MC; Chang CWD; Malekzadeh S; Pletcher SD
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Aug; 169(2):267-275. PubMed ID: 36871180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The golden tickets: impact of preference signaling on obstetrics and gynecology residency applicants.
Cai F; Southworth E; Santiago S; Stephenson-Famy A; Fay E; Wang EY; Burns RN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Feb; 230(2):262.e1-262.e9. PubMed ID: 37839590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Applicant-to-Residency Program Communication: Does It Matter?
Solis RN; Quesada PR; Ma C; Olinde LM; Diaz RC
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2020 Nov; 129(11):1056-1062. PubMed ID: 32483992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Computer Simulation Model to Analyze the Application Process for Competitive Residency Programs.
Whipple ME; Law AB; Bly RA
J Grad Med Educ; 2019 Feb; 11(1):30-35. PubMed ID: 30805093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving Applicant Satisfaction in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Matching: The Role of Preference Signaling.
Tamburini LM; Davey AP; Messina JC; Zeng F; Geaney LE
Iowa Orthop J; 2024; 44(1):11-15. PubMed ID: 38919355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preference Signaling in the 2022 Urology Residency Match - The Applicant Perspective.
Leopold Z; Rajagopalan A; Mikhail M; Lee G; Tabakin A; Park JH; Jang T; Elsamra SE; Singer EA
Urology; 2022 Dec; 170():33-37. PubMed ID: 36195167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of Applicants' Characteristics and Geographic Connections to Residency Programs on Preference Signaling Outcomes in the Match.
Benjamin WJ; Lenze NR; Bohm LA; Thorne MC; Abraham R; Sepdham D; Mihalic AP; Kupfer RA
Acad Med; 2024 Apr; 99(4):437-444. PubMed ID: 37976398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Qualities of residency applicants: comparison of otolaryngology program criteria with applicant expectations.
Puscas L; Sharp SR; Schwab B; Lee WT
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Jan; 138(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 22249622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preference Signaling and the Integrated Plastic Surgery Match: A National Survey Study.
Sergesketter AR; Song E; Shammas RL; Tian WM; Eberlin KR; Ko JH; Momoh AO; Snyder-Warwick A; Phillips BT
J Surg Educ; 2024 May; 81(5):662-670. PubMed ID: 38553367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Value of Signaling an Orthopaedic Surgery Program: A Survey to Orthopaedic Surgery Programs.
Sorenson JC; Ryan PM; Ward RA; Fornfeist DS
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev; 2023 Jun; 7(6):. PubMed ID: 37276378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preference Signaling in the Orthopaedic Surgery Match: Applicant and Residency Program Attitudes, Behaviors, and Outcomes.
Guthrie ST; Dagher T; Essey-Stapleton J; Balach T
JB JS Open Access; 2024; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 38685965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Competitiveness of Otolaryngology Residency Applicants without a Home Program.
Wang JC; Pillutla P; Tello N; Gabrilska R; Aranke M; Bibb T; Watkins PD; Cordero J
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2020 May; 129(5):462-468. PubMed ID: 31845588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Current Interview Trail Metrics in the Otolaryngology Match.
Cabrera-Muffly C; Chang CWD; Puscas L
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Jun; 156(6):1097-1103. PubMed ID: 28168889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peri-Interview Communication in the Otolaryngology Residency Match: The Applicant Perspective.
Masciello M; Malekzadeh S
Laryngoscope; 2021 Jan; 131(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 32065402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of applicant and program factors on preference signaling outcomes in otolaryngology.
Benjamin WJ; Lenze NR; Yalamanchi P; Farlow JL; Mihalic AP; Bohm LA; Thorne MC; Kupfer RA
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol; 2023 Apr; 8(2):401-408. PubMed ID: 37090886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
