These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34620956)

  • 1. Evaluation of head posture using an inertial measurement unit.
    Al-Yassary M; Billiaert K; Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):19911. PubMed ID: 34620956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement proprieties of the CROM instrument for assessing head posture, neck retraction and protraction.
    Elizagaray-García I; Obispo-Villamayor Á; Prats-Martínez C; Prieto-Hernández G; Carvalho GF
    Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2024 Jun; 71():102950. PubMed ID: 38574577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Test - re-test reliability and concurrent validity of cervical active range of motion in young asymptomatic adults using a new inertial measurement unit device.
    Chalimourdas A; Dimitriadis Z; Kapreli E; Strimpakos N
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2021 Oct; 18(10):1029-1037. PubMed ID: 34420436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device.
    Audette I; Dumas JP; Côté JN; De Serres SJ
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2010 May; 40(5):318-23. PubMed ID: 20436238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity and reliability of head posture measurement using Microsoft Kinect.
    Oh BL; Kim J; Kim J; Hwang JM; Lee J
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Nov; 98(11):1560-4. PubMed ID: 25271910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity and Reliability of an Inertial Measurement Unit-based 3-Dimensional Angular Measurement of Cervical Range of Motion.
    Yoon TL; Kim HN; Min JH
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2019 Jan; 42(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 31054596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity and reliability of a sensor-based electronic spinal mobility index for axial spondyloarthritis.
    Gardiner PV; Small D; Muñoz-Esquivel K; Condell J; Cuesta-Vargas A; Williams J; Machado PM; Garrido-Castro JL
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2020 Nov; 59(11):3415-3423. PubMed ID: 32342100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring the difference in natural head position between the standing and sitting positions using an inertial measurement unit.
    Billiaert K; Al-Yassary M; Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2021 Oct; 48(10):1144-1149. PubMed ID: 34293214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using the cervical range of motion (CROM) device to assess head repositioning accuracy in individuals with cervical radiculopathy in comparison to neck- healthy individuals.
    Wibault J; Vaillant J; Vuillerme N; Dedering Å; Peolsson A
    Man Ther; 2013 Oct; 18(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 23473752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nintendo Wii remote controllers for head posture measurement: accuracy, validity, and reliability of the infrared optical head tracker.
    Kim J; Nam KW; Jang IG; Yang HK; Kim KG; Hwang JM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Mar; 53(3):1388-96. PubMed ID: 22297495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of measuring forward head posture in a clinical setting.
    Garrett TR; Youdas JW; Madson TJ
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1993 Mar; 17(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 8472080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Kinematics and temporospatial parameters during gait from inertial motion capture in adults with and without HIV: a validity and reliability study.
    Berner K; Cockcroft J; Louw Q
    Biomed Eng Online; 2020 Jul; 19(1):57. PubMed ID: 32709239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity of an inertial measurement unit to assess pelvic orientation angles during gait, sit-stand transfers and step-up transfers: Comparison with an optoelectronic motion capture system.
    Bolink SA; Naisas H; Senden R; Essers H; Heyligers IC; Meijer K; Grimm B
    Med Eng Phys; 2016 Mar; 38(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 26711470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of natural head position over five minutes: A comparison between an instantaneous and a five-minute analysis with an inertial measurement unit.
    Al-Yassary M; Billiaert K; Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2022 Apr; 49(4):407-413. PubMed ID: 34919743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inter, intra-examiner reliability and validity of inertial sensors to measure the active cervical range of motion in patients with primary headache.
    Elizagaray-García I; Gil-Martínez A; Navarro-Fernández G; Navarro-Moreno AR; Sánchez-de-Toro-Hernández J; Díaz-de-Terán J; Lerma-Lara S
    EXCLI J; 2021; 20():879-893. PubMed ID: 34177408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are Wearable Sensors Valid and Reliable for Studying the Baseball Pitching Motion? An Independent Comparison With Marker-Based Motion Capture.
    Camp CL; Loushin S; Nezlek S; Fiegen AP; Christoffer D; Kaufman K
    Am J Sports Med; 2021 Sep; 49(11):3094-3101. PubMed ID: 34339317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Concurrent Validity and Reliability of an Inertial Measurement Unit for the Assessment of Craniocervical Range of Motion in Subjects with Cerebral Palsy.
    Carmona-Pérez C; Garrido-Castro JL; Torres Vidal F; Alcaraz-Clariana S; García-Luque L; Alburquerque-Sendín F; Rodrigues-de-Souza DP
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2020 Feb; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 32024117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of an Inertial Sensor Algorithm to Quantify Head and Trunk Movement in Healthy Young Adults and Individuals with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
    Parrington L; Jehu DA; Fino PC; Pearson S; El-Gohary M; King LA
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Dec; 18(12):. PubMed ID: 30572640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variations in Concurrent Validity of Two Independent Inertial Measurement Units Compared to Gold Standard for Upper Body Posture during Computerised Device Use.
    Lee R; Akhundov R; James C; Edwards S; Snodgrass SJ
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jul; 23(15):. PubMed ID: 37571544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability and validity of a Coda Motion 3-D Analysis system for measuring cervical range of motion in healthy subjects.
    Song H; Zhai X; Gao Z; Lu T; Tian Q; Li H; He X
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2018 Feb; 38():56-66. PubMed ID: 29169054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.