These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34622490)

  • 1. Projecting biodiversity benefits of conservation behavior-change programs.
    Selinske MJ; Bekessy SA; Geary WL; Faulkner R; Hames F; Fletcher C; Squires ZE; Garrard GE
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Jun; 36(3):e13845. PubMed ID: 34622490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of risk aversion on prioritizing conservation projects.
    Tulloch AI; Maloney RF; Joseph LN; Bennett JR; Di Fonzo MM; Probert WJ; O'Connor SM; Densem JP; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):513-24. PubMed ID: 25327837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An introduction to decision science for conservation.
    Hemming V; Camaclang AE; Adams MS; Burgman M; Carbeck K; Carwardine J; Chadès I; Chalifour L; Converse SJ; Davidson LNK; Garrard GE; Finn R; Fleri JR; Huard J; Mayfield HJ; Madden EM; Naujokaitis-Lewis I; Possingham HP; Rumpff L; Runge MC; Stewart D; Tulloch VJD; Walshe T; Martin TG
    Conserv Biol; 2022 Feb; 36(1):e13868. PubMed ID: 34856010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Expert predictions of changes in vegetation condition reveal perceived risks in biodiversity offsetting.
    Dorrough J; Sinclair SJ; Oliver I
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216703. PubMed ID: 31067268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rapidly assessing cobenefits to advance threat-management alliances.
    Rees MW; Carwardine J; Reeson A; Firn J
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Aug; 34(4):843-853. PubMed ID: 32406533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of climate and land-cover change on the conservation status of gibbons.
    Yang L; Chen T; Shi KC; Zhang L; Lwin N; Fan PF
    Conserv Biol; 2023 Feb; 37(1):e14045. PubMed ID: 36511895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prioritizing species conservation programs based on IUCN Green Status and estimates of cost-sharing potential.
    Lloyd NA; Keating LM; Friesen AJ; Cole DM; McPherson JM; Akçakaya HR; Moehrenschlager A
    Conserv Biol; 2023 Jun; 37(3):e14051. PubMed ID: 36661059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Setting conservation management thresholds using a novel participatory modeling approach.
    Addison PF; de Bie K; Rumpff L
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):1411-22. PubMed ID: 26040608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prioritizing debt conversion opportunities for marine conservation.
    McGowan J; Weary R; Carriere L; Game ET; Smith JL; Garvey M; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Oct; 34(5):1065-1075. PubMed ID: 32424907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Priority threat management of invasive animals to protect biodiversity under climate change.
    Firn J; Maggini R; Chadès I; Nicol S; Walters B; Reeson A; Martin TG; Possingham HP; Pichancourt JB; Ponce-Reyes R; Carwardine J
    Glob Chang Biol; 2015 Nov; 21(11):3917-30. PubMed ID: 26179346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benefits of integrating complementarity into priority threat management.
    Chadés I; Nicol S; van Leeuwen S; Walters B; Firn J; Reeson A; Martin TG; Carwardine J
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):525-36. PubMed ID: 25362843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Untapped potential of collective intelligence in conservation and environmental decision making.
    Vercammen A; Burgman M
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Dec; 33(6):1247-1255. PubMed ID: 31006918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effective conservation of an endangered frog under uncertainty.
    Rose LE; Heard GW; Chee YE; Wintle BA
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Apr; 30(2):350-61. PubMed ID: 26395969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The grain of spatially referenced economic cost and biodiversity benefit data and the effectiveness of a cost targeting strategy.
    Sutton NJ; Armsworth PR
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1451-61. PubMed ID: 25381868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of threat management interactions on conservation priorities.
    Auerbach NA; Wilson KA; Tulloch AI; Rhodes JR; Hanson JO; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Dec; 29(6):1626-35. PubMed ID: 26171646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Planning for ex situ conservation in the face of uncertainty.
    Canessa S; Converse SJ; West M; Clemann N; Gillespie G; McFadden M; Silla AJ; Parris KM; McCarthy MA
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Jun; 30(3):599-609. PubMed ID: 26306549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Building robust conservation plans.
    Visconti P; Joppa L
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):503-12. PubMed ID: 25362995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Software for prioritizing conservation actions based on probabilistic information.
    Watts M; Klein CJ; Tulloch VJD; Carvalho SB; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Aug; 35(4):1299-1308. PubMed ID: 33305882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the shelf life of cost-efficient conservation plans for species at risk across gradients of agricultural land use.
    Robillard CM; Kerr JT
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Aug; 31(4):837-847. PubMed ID: 27991681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The challenge of biased evidence in conservation.
    Christie AP; Amano T; Martin PA; Petrovan SO; Shackelford GE; Simmons BI; Smith RK; Williams DR; Wordley CFR; Sutherland WJ
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Feb; 35(1):249-262. PubMed ID: 32583521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.