These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34623023)

  • 1. The IAEA remote and automated quality control methodology for radiography and mammography.
    Mora P; Pfeiffer D; Zhang G; Bosmans H; Delis H; Razi Z; Arreola M; Tsapaki V
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 22(11):126-142. PubMed ID: 34623023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. IAEA support to medical physics in nuclear medicine.
    Meghzifene A; Sgouros G
    Semin Nucl Med; 2013 May; 43(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 23561455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Latin American dose survey results in mammography studies under IAEA programme: radiological protection of patients in medical exposures (TSA3).
    Mora P; Blanco S; Khoury H; Leyton F; Cárdenas J; Defaz MY; Garay F; Telón F; Aguilar JG; Roas N; Gamarra M; Blanco D; Quintero AR; Nader A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Mar; 163(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 24993012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. AUTOMATED QC FOR INTERVENTIONAL SYSTEMS AND MAMMOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
    Visanuyanont T; Gluchowski P; Hillberg E; Moberg T; Svalkvist A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 Oct; 195(3-4):399-406. PubMed ID: 33912965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improvement of early detection of breast cancer through collaborative multi-country efforts: Medical physics component.
    Mora P; Faulkner K; Mahmoud AM; Gershan V; Kausik A; Zdesar U; Brandan ME; Kurt S; Davidović J; Salama DH; Aribal E; Odio C; Chaturvedi AK; Sabih Z; Vujnović S; Paez D; Delis H
    Phys Med; 2018 Apr; 48():127-134. PubMed ID: 29599081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evaluation of the 1Shot Phantom dedicated to the mammography system using FCR].
    Nagashima C; Uchiyama N; Moriyama N; Nagata M; Kobayashi H; Sankoda K; Saotome S; Tagi M; Kusunoki T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2009 Jul; 65(7):921-30. PubMed ID: 19661726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A single phantom, a single statistical method for low-contrast detectability assessment.
    Paruccini N; Villa R; Oberhofer N; Loria A; Signoriello M; Giordano C; Soavi R; Colombo P; De Mattia C; Rottoli F; Nici S; Origgi D; Emiro F; D'Ercole L; Mantovani L; Cavallari M; Quattrocchi M; Pietrobon F; Bregant P; Riccardi L; Radice A; Luraschi F; Milan L; Nocera P; Strocchi S; Pierotti L; Taddeucci A; Guerra G; Felisi M; Riga S; Trianni A
    Phys Med; 2021 Nov; 91():28-42. PubMed ID: 34710789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improvement in mammography quality control: 1987-1995.
    Hendrick RE; Chrvala CA; Plott CM; Cutter GR; Jessop NW; Wilcox-Buchalla P
    Radiology; 1998 Jun; 207(3):663-8. PubMed ID: 9609888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated daily quality control analysis for mammography in a multi-unit imaging center.
    Sundell VM; Mäkelä T; Meaney A; Kaasalainen T; Savolainen S
    Acta Radiol; 2019 Feb; 60(2):140-148. PubMed ID: 29768928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimizing Digital Mammographic Image Quality for Full-Field Digital Detectors: Artifacts Encountered during the QC Process.
    Jayadevan R; Armada MJ; Shaheen R; Mulcahy C; Slanetz PJ
    Radiographics; 2015; 35(7):2080-9. PubMed ID: 26562238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Investigation of quality control and average glandular dose and image quality in digital mammography in Hokkaido].
    Kurowarabi K; Abe H; Horita H; Kaneta K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 21532248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of an automated grid artifact detection system for quality control in digital mammography.
    MacLellan CJ; Layman RR; Geiser W; Gress DA; Jones AK
    Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3442-3450. PubMed ID: 31116445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital radiography image quality evaluation using various phantoms and software.
    Tsalafoutas IA; AlKhazzam S; Tsapaki V; AlNaemi H; Kharita MH
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 23(12):e13823. PubMed ID: 36345212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Pilot Study on the Development of Remote Quality Control of Digital Mammography Systems in the NHS Breast Screening Programme.
    Looney P; Halling-Brown MD; Oduko JM; Young KC
    J Digit Imaging; 2015 Oct; 28(5):586-93. PubMed ID: 25582530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Central online quality assurance in radiology: an IT solution exemplified by the German Breast Cancer Screening Program].
    Czwoydzinski J; Girnus R; Sommer A; Heindel W; Lenzen H
    Rofo; 2011 Sep; 183(9):849-54. PubMed ID: 21830180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison of Contrast to Noise Ratio and Signal Difference to Noise Ratio Based on QA and QC Guidelines in CR Mammography].
    Nagami A; Ishii M; Ishii R; Kodama S; Sanada T; Yoshida A
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Jun; 72(6):503-13. PubMed ID: 27320154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A multiparametric automatic method to monitor long-term reproducibility in digital mammography: results from a regional screening programme.
    Gennaro G; Ballaminut A; Contento G
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Sep; 27(9):3776-3787. PubMed ID: 28130611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ongoing quality control in digital radiography: Report of AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 151.
    Jones AK; Heintz P; Geiser W; Goldman L; Jerjian K; Martin M; Peck D; Pfeiffer D; Ranger N; Yorkston J
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6658-70. PubMed ID: 26520756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality control of CT systems by automated monitoring of key performance indicators: a two-year study.
    Nowik P; Bujila R; Poludniowski G; Fransson A
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 16(4):254–265. PubMed ID: 26219012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trial of a proposed protocol for constancy control of digital mammography systems.
    Pedersen K; Landmark ID
    Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5537-46. PubMed ID: 20095266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.