159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34623193)
1. Developing clinical prediction models when adhering to minimum sample size recommendations: The importance of quantifying bootstrap variability in tuning parameters and predictive performance.
Martin GP; Riley RD; Collins GS; Sperrin M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Dec; 30(12):2545-2561. PubMed ID: 34623193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Regression shrinkage methods for clinical prediction models do not guarantee improved performance: Simulation study.
Van Calster B; van Smeden M; De Cock B; Steyerberg EW
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Nov; 29(11):3166-3178. PubMed ID: 32401702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Penalization and shrinkage methods produced unreliable clinical prediction models especially when sample size was small.
Riley RD; Snell KIE; Martin GP; Whittle R; Archer L; Sperrin M; Collins GS
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Apr; 132():88-96. PubMed ID: 33307188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model using multinomial logistic regression.
Pate A; Riley RD; Collins GS; van Smeden M; Van Calster B; Ensor J; Martin GP
Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Mar; 32(3):555-571. PubMed ID: 36660777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sample size considerations and predictive performance of multinomial logistic prediction models.
de Jong VMT; Eijkemans MJC; van Calster B; Timmerman D; Moons KGM; Steyerberg EW; van Smeden M
Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(9):1601-1619. PubMed ID: 30614028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimum sample size calculations for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a time-to-event outcome.
Riley RD; Collins GS; Ensor J; Archer L; Booth S; Mozumder SI; Rutherford MJ; van Smeden M; Lambert PC; Snell KIE
Stat Med; 2022 Mar; 41(7):1280-1295. PubMed ID: 34915593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Empirical evaluation of internal validation methods for prediction in large-scale clinical data with rare-event outcomes: a case study in suicide risk prediction.
Coley RY; Liao Q; Simon N; Shortreed SM
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Feb; 23(1):33. PubMed ID: 36721082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: Part I - Continuous outcomes.
Riley RD; Snell KIE; Ensor J; Burke DL; Harrell FE; Moons KGM; Collins GS
Stat Med; 2019 Mar; 38(7):1262-1275. PubMed ID: 30347470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sample size requirements are not being considered in studies developing prediction models for binary outcomes: a systematic review.
Dhiman P; Ma J; Qi C; Bullock G; Sergeant JC; Riley RD; Collins GS
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Aug; 23(1):188. PubMed ID: 37598153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a continuous outcome.
Archer L; Snell KIE; Ensor J; Hudda MT; Collins GS; Riley RD
Stat Med; 2021 Jan; 40(1):133-146. PubMed ID: 33150684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sample size for binary logistic prediction models: Beyond events per variable criteria.
van Smeden M; Moons KG; de Groot JA; Collins GS; Altman DG; Eijkemans MJ; Reitsma JB
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2455-2474. PubMed ID: 29966490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: PART II - binary and time-to-event outcomes.
Riley RD; Snell KI; Ensor J; Burke DL; Harrell FE; Moons KG; Collins GS
Stat Med; 2019 Mar; 38(7):1276-1296. PubMed ID: 30357870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk prediction models for discrete ordinal outcomes: Calibration and the impact of the proportional odds assumption.
Edlinger M; van Smeden M; Alber HF; Wanitschek M; Van Calster B
Stat Med; 2022 Apr; 41(8):1334-1360. PubMed ID: 34897756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation and development of models using clinical, biochemical and ultrasound markers for predicting pre-eclampsia: an individual participant data meta-analysis.
Allotey J; Snell KI; Smuk M; Hooper R; Chan CL; Ahmed A; Chappell LC; von Dadelszen P; Dodds J; Green M; Kenny L; Khalil A; Khan KS; Mol BW; Myers J; Poston L; Thilaganathan B; Staff AC; Smith GC; Ganzevoort W; Laivuori H; Odibo AO; Ramírez JA; Kingdom J; Daskalakis G; Farrar D; Baschat AA; Seed PT; Prefumo F; da Silva Costa F; Groen H; Audibert F; Masse J; Skråstad RB; Salvesen KÅ; Haavaldsen C; Nagata C; Rumbold AR; Heinonen S; Askie LM; Smits LJ; Vinter CA; Magnus PM; Eero K; Villa PM; Jenum AK; Andersen LB; Norman JE; Ohkuchi A; Eskild A; Bhattacharya S; McAuliffe FM; Galindo A; Herraiz I; Carbillon L; Klipstein-Grobusch K; Yeo S; Teede HJ; Browne JL; Moons KG; Riley RD; Thangaratinam S
Health Technol Assess; 2020 Dec; 24(72):1-252. PubMed ID: 33336645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a binary outcome.
Riley RD; Debray TPA; Collins GS; Archer L; Ensor J; van Smeden M; Snell KIE
Stat Med; 2021 Aug; 40(19):4230-4251. PubMed ID: 34031906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Practical approach to determine sample size for building logistic prediction models using high-throughput data.
Son DS; Lee D; Lee K; Jung SH; Ahn T; Lee E; Sohn I; Chung J; Park W; Huh N; Lee JW
J Biomed Inform; 2015 Feb; 53():355-62. PubMed ID: 25555898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Events per variable (EPV) and the relative performance of different strategies for estimating the out-of-sample validity of logistic regression models.
Austin PC; Steyerberg EW
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):796-808. PubMed ID: 25411322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of hyperparameter tuning procedures for clinical prediction models: A simulation study.
Dunias ZS; Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Boulesteix AL; van Smeden M
Stat Med; 2024 Mar; 43(6):1119-1134. PubMed ID: 38189632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic models for identifying risk of poor outcome in people with acute ankle sprains: the SPRAINED development and external validation study.
Keene DJ; Schlüssel MM; Thompson J; Hagan DA; Williams MA; Byrne C; Goodacre S; Cooke M; Gwilym S; Hormbrey P; Bostock J; Haywood K; Wilson D; Collins GS; Lamb SE
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Nov; 22(64):1-112. PubMed ID: 30474592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
