BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34623604)

  • 1. The impact of auditory distraction on reading comprehension: An individual differences investigation.
    Hao H; Conway ARA
    Mem Cognit; 2022 May; 50(4):852-863. PubMed ID: 34623604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of mild traumatic brain injury on reading comprehension and eye movements: preliminary results.
    Ratiu I; Fissel-Brannick S; Whiting M; Murnion L; Azuma T
    J Commun Disord; 2022; 96():106197. PubMed ID: 35151226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction.
    Marsh JE; Campbell TA; Vachon F; Taylor PJ; Hughes RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):350-362. PubMed ID: 31290133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robust relationship between reading span and speech recognition in noise.
    Souza P; Arehart K
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):705-13. PubMed ID: 25975360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional control and metacognitive monitoring of the effects of different types of task-irrelevant sound on serial recall.
    Kattner F; Bryce D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Feb; 48(2):139-158. PubMed ID: 34968110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Text as a Supplement to Speech in Young and Older Adults.
    Krull V; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):164-76. PubMed ID: 26458131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of background noise and extraversion on reading comprehension performance.
    Gheewalla F; McClelland A; Furnham A
    Ergonomics; 2021 May; 64(5):593-599. PubMed ID: 33213299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Harnessing the wandering mind: the role of perceptual load.
    Forster S; Lavie N
    Cognition; 2009 Jun; 111(3):345-55. PubMed ID: 19327760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mind wandering while reading easy and difficult texts.
    Feng S; D'Mello S; Graesser AC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Jun; 20(3):586-92. PubMed ID: 23288660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual differences in memory disruption caused by simulated cellphone notifications.
    Schmidt CR; Schmidt SR; Wilson KA
    Memory; 2022 Nov; 30(10):1349-1386. PubMed ID: 36089897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Opposing effects of perceptual versus working memory load on emotional distraction.
    Tavares TP; Logie K; Mitchell DG
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):2945-56. PubMed ID: 27329606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mindfulness training improves working memory capacity and GRE performance while reducing mind wandering.
    Mrazek MD; Franklin MS; Phillips DT; Baird B; Schooler JW
    Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):776-81. PubMed ID: 23538911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cortical potentials in an auditory oddball task reflect individual differences in working memory capacity.
    Yurgil KA; Golob EJ
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Dec; 50(12):1263-74. PubMed ID: 24016201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When there is noise on Sherlock Holmes: mind wandering increases with perceptual processing difficulty during reading and listening.
    Steindorf L; Pink S; Rummel J; Smallwood J
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2023 May; 8(1):31. PubMed ID: 37227554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distracted While Reading? Changing to a Hard-to-Read Font Shields against the Effects of Environmental Noise and Speech on Text Memory.
    Halin N
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1196. PubMed ID: 27555834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory distraction in school-age children relative to individual differences in working memory capacity.
    Nagaraj NK; Magimairaj BM; Schwartz S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Oct; 82(7):3581-3593. PubMed ID: 32494910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Poor comprehenders in the classroom: teacher ratings of behavior in children with poor reading comprehension and its relationship with individual differences in working memory.
    Pimperton H; Nation K
    J Learn Disabil; 2014; 47(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 22907886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual demand and distraction interactions mediated by task-control networks.
    Pillay S; Durgerian S; Sabri M
    Neuroimage; 2016 Sep; 138():141-146. PubMed ID: 27261159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mental juggling: when does multitasking impair reading comprehension?
    Cho KW; Altarriba J; Popiel M
    J Gen Psychol; 2015; 142(2):90-105. PubMed ID: 25832739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: a test of four hypotheses.
    Engle RW; Cantor J; Carullo JJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Sep; 18(5):972-92. PubMed ID: 1402719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.