110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34624389)
1. Factors associated with participation in the organized cervical cancer screening program in the greater Paris area (France): An analysis among more than 200,000 women.
Audiger C; Bovagnet T; Deghaye M; Kaufmanis A; Pelisson C; Bochaton A; Menvielle G
Prev Med; 2021 Dec; 153():106831. PubMed ID: 34624389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Social Inequalities in Participation in Cervical Cancer Screening in a Metropolitan Area Implementing a Pilot Organised Screening Programme (Paris Region, France).
Audiger C; Bovagnet T; Bardes J; Abihsera G; Nicolet J; Deghaye M; Bochaton A; Menvielle G
Int J Public Health; 2022; 67():1604562. PubMed ID: 35859669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Population-based organized cervical cancer screening pilot program in France.
Hamers FF; Duport N; Beltzer N
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2018 Sep; 27(5):486-492. PubMed ID: 28362653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk of late cervical cancer screening in the Paris region according to social deprivation and medical densities in daily visited neighborhoods.
Traoré M; Vallée J; Chauvin P
Int J Health Geogr; 2020 May; 19(1):18. PubMed ID: 32466794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical cancer screening among homeless women in the Greater Paris Area (France): results of the ENFAMS survey.
Vuillermoz C; Vandentorren S; Roze M; Rondet C; Chauvin P
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2017 May; 26(3):240-248. PubMed ID: 26895575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical cancer screening programs and their context-dependent effect on inequalities in screening uptake: a dynamic interplay between public health policy and welfare state redistribution.
De Prez V; Jolidon V; Willems B; Cullati S; Burton-Jeangros C; Bracke P
Int J Equity Health; 2021 Sep; 20(1):211. PubMed ID: 34560888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical and breast cancer screening participation for women with chronic conditions in France: results from a national health survey.
Constantinou P; Dray-Spira R; Menvielle G
BMC Cancer; 2016 Mar; 16():255. PubMed ID: 27029643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Study protocol for the most effective recall method in a cervical cancer screening program in Klang, Malaysia.
Abdul Rashid RM; Dahlui M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(10):5867-70. PubMed ID: 24289591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The combined effects of activity space and neighbourhood of residence on participation in preventive health-care activities: The case of cervical screening in the Paris metropolitan area (France).
Vallée J; Cadot E; Grillo F; Parizot I; Chauvin P
Health Place; 2010 Sep; 16(5):838-52. PubMed ID: 20451439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of an Intervention in General Practice to Increase the Participation of Immigrants in Cervical Cancer Screening: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.
Møen KA; Kumar B; Igland J; Diaz E
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Apr; 3(4):e201903. PubMed ID: 32236530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Participation in interventions and recommended follow-up for non-attendees in cervical cancer screening -taking the women's own preferred test method into account-A Swedish randomised controlled trial.
Lilliecreutz C; Karlsson H; Spetz Holm AC
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235202. PubMed ID: 32614875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Organized cervical cancer screening for underpriviledged women].
Piana L; Leandri FX; Jacqueme B; Heid P; Corti J; Andrac-Meyer L; Sancho-Garnier H
Bull Cancer; 2007 May; 94(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 17535784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical morbidity in Alsace, France: results from a regional organized cervical cancer screening program.
Baldauf JJ; Fender M; Bergeron C; Marrer E; Velten M; Pradat P; Arbyn M
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2019 Jan; 28(1):33-39. PubMed ID: 29135538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of invitation and reminder letters on cervical cancer screening participation rates in an organized screening program.
Tavasoli SM; Pefoyo AJ; Hader J; Lee A; Kupets R
Prev Med; 2016 Jul; 88():230-6. PubMed ID: 27143497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. To what extent is women's economic situation associated with cancer screening uptake when nationwide screening exists? A study of breast and cervical cancer screening in France in 2010.
Menvielle G; Richard JB; Ringa V; Dray-Spira R; Beck F
Cancer Causes Control; 2014 Aug; 25(8):977-83. PubMed ID: 24842393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of cervical cancer education and provider recommendation for screening on screening rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Musa J; Achenbach CJ; O'Dwyer LC; Evans CT; McHugh M; Hou L; Simon MA; Murphy RL; Jordan N
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0183924. PubMed ID: 28873092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. General practitioners can increase participation in cervical cancer screening - a model program in Hungary.
Gyulai A; Nagy A; Pataki V; Tonté D; Ádány R; Vokó Z
BMC Fam Pract; 2018 May; 19(1):67. PubMed ID: 29778099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. "Cervical cancer screening: awareness is not enough". Understanding barriers to screening among women in West Cameroon-a qualitative study using focus groups.
Datchoua Moukam AM; Embolo Owono MS; Kenfack B; Vassilakos P; Petignat P; Sormani J; Schmidt NC
Reprod Health; 2021 Jul; 18(1):147. PubMed ID: 34243778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Invitation to cervical cancer screening does increase participation in Germany: Results from the MARZY study.
Radde K; Gottschalk A; Bussas U; Schülein S; Schriefer D; Seifert U; Neumann A; Kaiser M; Blettner M; Klug SJ
Int J Cancer; 2016 Sep; 139(5):1018-30. PubMed ID: 27083776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Participation of women in cervical cancer screening. Results of the first 5 years of a pilot program in the province of Doubs].
Monnet E; Carbillet JP; Meslans Y; Petitjean A; Gautier CP
Presse Med; 1999 Dec; 28(38):2093-7. PubMed ID: 10613195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
