159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34624777)
21. Quantification of copper content with laser induced breakdown spectroscopy as a potential indicator of offal adulteration in beef.
Casado-Gavalda MP; Dixit Y; Geulen D; Cama-Moncunill R; Cama-Moncunill X; Markiewicz-Keszycka M; Cullen PJ; Sullivan C
Talanta; 2017 Jul; 169():123-129. PubMed ID: 28411800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Relative quantification of pork and beef in meat products using global and species-specific peptide markers for the authentication of meat composition.
Nalazek-Rudnicka K; Kłosowska-Chomiczewska IE; Brockmeyer J; Wasik A; Macierzanka A
Food Chem; 2022 Sep; 389():133066. PubMed ID: 35567862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Detection and quantification of beef and pork materials in meat products by duplex droplet digital PCR.
Cai Y; He Y; Lv R; Chen H; Wang Q; Pan L
PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0181949. PubMed ID: 28771608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Authentication of processed meat products by peptidomic analysis using rapid ambient mass spectrometry.
Montowska M; Alexander MR; Tucker GA; Barrett DA
Food Chem; 2015 Nov; 187():297-304. PubMed ID: 25977030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Rapid detection of adulteration of minced beef using Vis/NIR reflectance spectroscopy with multivariate methods.
Weng S; Guo B; Tang P; Yin X; Pan F; Zhao J; Huang L; Zhang D
Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc; 2020 Apr; 230():118005. PubMed ID: 31951866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Species-specific peptide-based liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry monitoring of three poultry species in processed meat products.
Fornal E; Montowska M
Food Chem; 2019 Jun; 283():489-498. PubMed ID: 30722903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Identification of animal species of origin in meat based on glycopeptide analysis by UPLC-QTOF-MS.
Tai J; Hu H; Cao X; Liang X; Lu Y; Zhang H
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2023 Dec; 415(29-30):7235-7246. PubMed ID: 37957327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Fast and on-site animal species identification in processed meat
Niebling L; Nitzsche R; Sieksmeyer T; Haskamp V; Kissenkötter J; Abd El Wahed A; Teufel T; Hermann H; Paust N; Homann AR
Lab Chip; 2024 Feb; 24(4):975-984. PubMed ID: 38284233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of high pressure treatment on the color of fresh and processed meats: A review.
Bak KH; Bolumar T; Karlsson AH; Lindahl G; Orlien V
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2019; 59(2):228-252. PubMed ID: 28846443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Identification and quantification of turkey meat adulteration in fresh, frozen-thawed and cooked minced beef by FT-NIR spectroscopy and chemometrics.
Alamprese C; Amigo JM; Casiraghi E; Engelsen SB
Meat Sci; 2016 Nov; 121():175-181. PubMed ID: 27337677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Cholesterol in beef, pork, chicken and their products commercialized in Maringá, Paraná, Brazil].
Rowe A; Bertoni SA; Pereira PL; Matsushita M; de Souza NE
Arch Latinoam Nutr; 1997 Sep; 47(3):282-4. PubMed ID: 9673687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Myoglobin as marker in meat adulteration: a UPLC method for determining the presence of pork meat in raw beef burger.
Giaretta N; Di Giuseppe AM; Lippert M; Parente A; Di Maro A
Food Chem; 2013 Dec; 141(3):1814-20. PubMed ID: 23870895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Integration of Non-targeted Proteomics Mass Spectrometry with Machine Learning for Screening Cooked Beef Adulterated Samples.
Pu K; Qiu J; Tong Y; Liu B; Cheng Z; Chen S; Ni WX; Lin Y; Ng KM
J Agric Food Chem; 2023 Feb; 71(4):2173-2182. PubMed ID: 36584280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Rapid analysis and identification of meat species by laser-ablation electrospray mass spectrometry (LAESI-MS).
Zhou W; Xia L; Huang C; Yang J; Shen C; Jiang H; Chu Y
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2016 Aug; 30 Suppl 1():116-21. PubMed ID: 27539425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Species-specific expression of various proteins in meat tissue: proteomic analysis of raw and cooked meat and meat products made from beef, pork and selected poultry species.
Montowska M; Pospiech E
Food Chem; 2013 Feb; 136(3-4):1461-9. PubMed ID: 23194549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Ready-to-use single tube quadruplex PCR for differential identification of mutton, chicken, pork and beef in processed meat samples.
Balakrishna K; Sreerohini S; Parida M
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess; 2019 Oct; 36(10):1435-1444. PubMed ID: 31305225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Identification of Pork Adulteration in Processed Meat Products Using the Developed Mitochondrial DNA-Based Primers.
Ha J; Kim S; Lee J; Lee S; Lee H; Choi Y; Oh H; Yoon Y
Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour; 2017; 37(3):464-468. PubMed ID: 28747833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of quantitative methods based on SYBR Green real-time qPCR to estimate pork meat adulteration in processed beef products.
Kang TS; Tanaka T
Food Chem; 2018 Dec; 269():549-558. PubMed ID: 30100472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy assisted chemometric methods for rice geographic origin classification.
Yang P; Zhou R; Zhang W; Tang S; Hao Z; Li X; Lu Y; Zeng X
Appl Opt; 2018 Oct; 57(28):8297-8302. PubMed ID: 30461781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Development and validation of a rapid test system for detection of pork meat and collagen residues.
Masiri J; Benoit L; Barrios-Lopez B; Thienes C; Meshgi M; Agapov A; Dobritsa A; Nadala C; Samadpour M
Meat Sci; 2016 Nov; 121():397-402. PubMed ID: 27448193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
