These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34624839)

  • 1. Predictors of long-term clinical outcomes in adult patients after lumbar total disc replacement: development and validation of a prediction model.
    Coric D; Zigler J; Derman P; Braxton E; Situ A; Patel L
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Mar; 36(3):399-407. PubMed ID: 34624839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Five-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial for Lumbar Artificial Discs in Single-level Degenerative Disc Disease.
    Yue JJ; Garcia R; Blumenthal S; Coric D; Patel VV; Dinh DH; Buttermann GR; Deutsch H; Miller LE; Persaud EJ; Ferko NC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Dec; 44(24):1685-1696. PubMed ID: 31404055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lumbar Total Disc Replacement for Discogenic Low Back Pain: Two-year Outcomes of the activL Multicenter Randomized Controlled IDE Clinical Trial.
    Garcia R; Yue JJ; Blumenthal S; Coric D; Patel VV; Leary SP; Dinh DH; Buttermann GR; Deutsch H; Girardi F; Billys J; Miller LE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Dec; 40(24):1873-81. PubMed ID: 26630435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Final Long-Term Reporting from a Randomized Controlled IDE Trial for Lumbar Artificial Discs in Single-Level Degenerative Disc Disease: 7-Year Results.
    Radcliff K; Zigler J; Braxton E; Buttermann G; Coric D; Derman P; Garcia R; Jorgensen A; Ferko NC; Situ A; Yue J
    Int J Spine Surg; 2021 Aug; 15(4):612-632. PubMed ID: 34266934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
    Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do presence and location of annular tear influence clinical outcome after lumbar total disc arthroplasty? A prospective 1-year follow-up study.
    Yue JJ; Telles C; Schlösser TP; Hermenau S; Ramachandran R; Long WD
    Int J Spine Surg; 2012; 6():13-7. PubMed ID: 25694865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Total disc replacement versus multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative discs: 8-year follow-up of a randomized controlled multicenter trial.
    Furunes H; Storheim K; Brox JI; Johnsen LG; Skouen JS; Franssen E; Solberg TK; Sandvik L; Hellum C
    Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1480-1488. PubMed ID: 28583869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 2. Predictive model for return to work after elective surgery for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Asher AL; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Parker SL; Bydon M; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):370-381. PubMed ID: 28498069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel lumbar total joint replacement may be an improvement over fusion for degenerative lumbar conditions: a comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes at one year.
    Alex Sielatycki J; Devin CJ; Pennings J; Koscielski M; Metcalf T; Archer KR; Dunn R; Craig Humphreys S; Hodges S
    Spine J; 2021 May; 21(5):829-840. PubMed ID: 33346156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association between muscle health and patient-reported outcomes after lumbar microdiscectomy: early results.
    Song J; Araghi K; Dupont MM; Shahi P; Bovonratwet P; Shinn D; Dalal SS; Melissaridou D; Virk SS; Iyer S; Dowdell JE; Sheha ED; Qureshi SA
    Spine J; 2022 Oct; 22(10):1677-1686. PubMed ID: 35671940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
    Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy in a young, active population: correlation by herniation type and level.
    Dewing CB; Provencher MT; Riffenburgh RH; Kerr S; Manos RE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18165746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up.
    Siepe CJ; Heider F; Wiechert K; Hitzl W; Ishak B; Mayer MH
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1417-31. PubMed ID: 24448028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction model for outcome after low-back surgery: individualized likelihood of complication, hospital readmission, return to work, and 12-month improvement in functional disability.
    McGirt MJ; Sivaganesan A; Asher AL; Devin CJ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E13. PubMed ID: 26621411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease.
    Zigler J; Delamarter R; Spivak JM; Linovitz RJ; Danielson GO; Haider TT; Cammisa F; Zuchermann J; Balderston R; Kitchel S; Foley K; Watkins R; Bradford D; Yue J; Yuan H; Herkowitz H; Geiger D; Bendo J; Peppers T; Sachs B; Girardi F; Kropf M; Goldstein J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11):1155-62; discussion 1163. PubMed ID: 17495770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months.
    Delamarter R; Zigler JE; Balderston RA; Cammisa FP; Goldstein JA; Spivak JM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Apr; 93(8):705-15. PubMed ID: 21398574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of therapies in lumbar degenerative disc disease: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zigler J; Ferko N; Cameron C; Patel L
    J Comp Eff Res; 2018 Mar; 7(3):233-246. PubMed ID: 29542364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction based on preoperative opioid use of clinical outcomes after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions.
    Villavicencio AT; Nelson EL; Kantha V; Burneikiene S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):144-149. PubMed ID: 27689425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Five-year clinical results of cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption clinical trial.
    Radcliff K; Coric D; Albert T
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Aug; 25(2):213-24. PubMed ID: 27015130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy compared with microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: 1-year results of an ongoing randomized controlled trial.
    Chen Z; Zhang L; Dong J; Xie P; Liu B; Wang Q; Chen R; Feng F; Yang B; Shu T; Li S; Yang Y; He L; Pang M; Rong L
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Mar; 28(3):300-310. PubMed ID: 29303469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.