335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34625835)
1. Perioperative morbidity of different operative approaches in early cervical carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy.
Kampers J; Gerhardt E; Sibbertsen P; Flock T; Hertel H; Klapdor R; Jentschke M; Hillemanns P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Aug; 306(2):295-314. PubMed ID: 34625835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Protective operative techniques in radical hysterectomy in early cervical carcinoma and their influence on disease-free and overall survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk groups.
Kampers J; Gerhardt E; Sibbertsen P; Flock T; Klapdor R; Hertel H; Jentschke M; Hillemanns P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Sep; 304(3):577-587. PubMed ID: 34021804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Park DA; Yun JE; Kim SW; Lee SH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Jun; 43(6):994-1002. PubMed ID: 27546015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.
Obermair A; Asher R; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Lopez A; Moretti-Marques R; Rendon G; Ribeiro R; Tsunoda A; Behan V; Buda A; Bernadini MQ; Zhao H; Vieira M; Walker J; Spirtos NM; Yao S; Chetty N; Zhu T; Isla D; Tamura M; Nicklin J; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Coleman RL; Salvo G; Ramirez PT
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10. PubMed ID: 31586602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Park DA; Lee DH; Kim SW; Lee SH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1303-14. PubMed ID: 27439723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Jin YM; Liu SS; Chen J; Chen YN; Ren CC
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193033. PubMed ID: 29554090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.
Aarts JW; Nieboer TE; Johnson N; Tavender E; Garry R; Mol BW; Kluivers KB
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Aug; 2015(8):CD003677. PubMed ID: 26264829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, excluding robotic assisted versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Marchand G; Masoud AT; Abdelsattar A; King A; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Moir C; Moberly A; Govindan M
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):273. PubMed ID: 36609438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with that of open and laparoscopic surgery: A separate meta-analysis of high-quality studies.
Zhang SS; Ding T; Cui ZH; Lv Y; Jiang RA
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jan; 98(4):e14171. PubMed ID: 30681582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the complications between minimally invasive surgery and open surgical treatments for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li Y; Kong Q; Wei H; Wang Y
PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253143. PubMed ID: 34197466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer.
Nezhat FR; Datta MS; Liu C; Chuang L; Zakashansky K
JSLS; 2008; 12(3):227-37. PubMed ID: 18765043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy using three robotic arms versus conventional multiport laparoscopy in patients with cervical cancer.
Yim GW; Kim SW; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim HJ; Kim YT
Yonsei Med J; 2014 Sep; 55(5):1222-30. PubMed ID: 25048478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: A case matched control study.
Gallotta V; Conte C; Federico A; Vizzielli G; Gueli Alletti S; Tortorella L; Pedone Anchora L; Cosentino F; Chiantera V; Fagotti A; D'Indinosante M; Pelligra S; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 44(6):754-759. PubMed ID: 29422253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robot-assisted approach to cervical cancer (RACC): an international multi-center, open-label randomized controlled trial.
Falconer H; Palsdottir K; Stalberg K; Dahm-Kähler P; Ottander U; Lundin ES; Wijk L; Kimmig R; Jensen PT; Zahl Eriksson AG; Mäenpää J; Persson J; Salehi S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jul; 29(6):1072-1076. PubMed ID: 31203203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The incidence of perioperative lymphatic complications after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy between robotic and laparoscopic approach : a systemic review and meta-analysis.
Hwang JH; Kim BW
Int J Surg; 2023 Aug; 109(8):2478-2485. PubMed ID: 37195800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shazly SA; Murad MH; Dowdy SC; Gostout BS; Famuyide AO
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Aug; 138(2):457-71. PubMed ID: 26056752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical efficacy and safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Long Y; Yao DS; Pan XW; Ou TY
PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e94116. PubMed ID: 24748015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy vs. Robotic assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Marchand G; Taher Masoud A; Abdelsattar A; King A; Brazil G; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Moir C; Baruelo G; Govindan M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Oct; 289():190-202. PubMed ID: 37690282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
