These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34626075)

  • 1. Practical and robust test for comparing binomial proportions in the randomized phase II setting.
    Attwood K; Park S; Hutson AD
    Pharm Stat; 2022 Mar; 21(2):361-371. PubMed ID: 34626075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample size computation in phase II designs combining the A'Hern design and the Sargent and Goldberg design.
    Neven A; Mauer M; Hasan B; Sylvester R; Collette L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2020 Mar; 30(2):305-321. PubMed ID: 31331234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative evaluation of single-arm versus randomized phase II cancer clinical trials.
    Pond GR; Abbasi S
    Clin Trials; 2011 Jun; 8(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 21511687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design issues in randomized phase II/III trials.
    Korn EL; Freidlin B; Abrams JS; Halabi S
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Feb; 30(6):667-71. PubMed ID: 22271475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On group sequential designs comparing two binomial proportions.
    Kepner JL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jan; 20(1):145-59. PubMed ID: 20077254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrated phase II/III clinical trials in oncology: a case study.
    Wang M; Dignam JJ; Zhang QE; DeGroot JF; Mehta MP; Hunsberger S
    Clin Trials; 2012 Dec; 9(6):741-7. PubMed ID: 23180870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized two-stage design for phase II clinical trials based on a Bayesian predictive approach.
    Cellamare M; Sambucini V
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(6):1059-78. PubMed ID: 25545805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized phase II clinical trials.
    Jung SH; Sargent DJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(4):802-16. PubMed ID: 24697589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of error rates in single-arm versus randomized phase II cancer clinical trials.
    Tang H; Foster NR; Grothey A; Ansell SM; Goldberg RM; Sargent DJ
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Apr; 28(11):1936-41. PubMed ID: 20212253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multi-arm multi-stage clinical trial design for binary outcomes with application to tuberculosis.
    Bratton DJ; Phillips PP; Parmar MK
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Nov; 13():139. PubMed ID: 24229079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized two-stage Phase II clinical trial designs based on Barnard's exact test.
    Shan G; Ma C; Hutson AD; Wilding GE
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(5):1081-90. PubMed ID: 23957517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized phase II trials with a prospective control.
    Jung SH
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(4):568-83. PubMed ID: 17573688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomized phase II trials: a long-term investment with promising returns.
    Sharma MR; Stadler WM; Ratain MJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Jul; 103(14):1093-100. PubMed ID: 21709274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Smaller sample sizes for phase II trials based on exact tests with actual error rates by trading-off their nominal levels of significance and power.
    Khan I; Sarker SJ; Hackshaw A
    Br J Cancer; 2012 Nov; 107(11):1801-9. PubMed ID: 23169334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accelerating clinical development of HIV vaccine strategies: methodological challenges and considerations in constructing an optimised multi-arm phase I/II trial design.
    Richert L; Doussau A; Lelièvre JD; Arnold V; Rieux V; Bouakane A; Lévy Y; Chêne G; Thiébaut R;
    Trials; 2014 Feb; 15():68. PubMed ID: 24571662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Emadi A; Chua JV; Talwani R; Bentzen SM; Baddley J
    Trials; 2020 Oct; 21(1):897. PubMed ID: 33115543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-stage screened selection designs for randomized phase II trials with time-to-event endpoints.
    Wu J; Pan H; Hsu CW
    Biom J; 2022 Oct; 64(7):1207-1218. PubMed ID: 35661226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptive designs for single-arm phase II trials in oncology.
    Englert S; Kieser M
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 22411839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An efficient algorithm to determine the optimal two-stage randomized multinomial designs in oncology clinical trials.
    Zhang Y; Mietlowski W; Chen B; Wang Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jan; 21(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 21191854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Curtailed two-stage design for comparing two arms in randomized phase II clinical trials.
    Chen CM; Chi Y; Chang HM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(5):939-950. PubMed ID: 29355457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.