120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34628659)
1. Monitor unit prediction model for wobbling proton therapy with ridge filters.
Jo K; Chung E; Han Y; Ahn SH; Sheen H; Cho S
Med Phys; 2021 Dec; 48(12):8107-8116. PubMed ID: 34628659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A procedure for calculation of monitor units for passively scattered proton radiotherapy beams.
Sahoo N; Zhu XR; Arjomandy B; Ciangaru G; Lii M; Amos R; Wu R; Gillin MT
Med Phys; 2008 Nov; 35(11):5088-97. PubMed ID: 19070243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimization of FLASH proton beams using a track-repeating algorithm.
Wang Q; Titt U; Mohan R; Guan F; Zhao Y; Yang M; Yepes P
Med Phys; 2022 Oct; 49(10):6684-6698. PubMed ID: 35900902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of activity pencil beam algorithm using measured distribution data of positron emitter nuclei for therapeutic SOBP proton beam.
Miyatake A; Nishio T
Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 40(9):091709. PubMed ID: 24007142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spread-out Bragg peak proton FLASH irradiation using a clinical synchrocyclotron: Proof of concept and ion chamber characterization.
Darafsheh A; Hao Y; Zhao X; Zwart T; Wagner M; Evans T; Reynoso F; Zhao T
Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 48(8):4472-4484. PubMed ID: 34077590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implementation of output prediction models for a passively double-scattered proton therapy system.
Ferguson S; Ahmad S; Jin H
Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 43(11):6089. PubMed ID: 27806587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A model-based analysis of a simplified beam-specific dose output in proton therapy with a single-ring wobbling system.
Kase Y; Yamashita H; Numano M; Sakama M; Mizota M; Maeda Y; Tameshige Y; Murayama S
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):359-74. PubMed ID: 25503686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analytical design method of optimum ridge filters for wobbled and collimated proton beams.
Himukai T; Takada Y; Hotta K; Hara Y; Komori M; Kanai T; Kohno R
Igaku Butsuri; 2008; 28(2):57-69. PubMed ID: 21976253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A sector-integration method for dose/MU calculation in a uniform scanning proton beam.
Zhao Q; Wu H; Wolanski M; Pack D; Johnstone PA; Das IJ
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(3):N87-95. PubMed ID: 20057011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Increased flexibility and efficiency of a double-scattering FLASH proton beamline configuration for
Hachadorian R; Cascio E; Schuemann J
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Jul; 68(15):. PubMed ID: 37369231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Benchmarking a GATE/Geant4 Monte Carlo model for proton beams in magnetic fields.
Padilla-Cabal F; Alejandro Fragoso J; Franz Resch A; Georg D; Fuchs H
Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 31661559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monte Carlo investigation of collimator scatter of proton-therapy beams produced using the passive scattering method.
Titt U; Zheng Y; Vassiliev ON; Newhauser WD
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(2):487-504. PubMed ID: 18185001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimental depth dose curves of a 67.5 MeV proton beam for benchmarking and validation of Monte Carlo simulation.
Faddegon BA; Shin J; Castenada CM; Ramos-Méndez J; Daftari IK
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4199-210. PubMed ID: 26133619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Commissioning dose computation models for spot scanning proton beams in water for a commercially available treatment planning system.
Zhu XR; Poenisch F; Lii M; Sawakuchi GO; Titt U; Bues M; Song X; Zhang X; Li Y; Ciangaru G; Li H; Taylor MB; Suzuki K; Mohan R; Gillin MT; Sahoo N
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041723. PubMed ID: 23556893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose monitoring and output correction for the effects of scanning field changes with uniform scanning proton beam.
Zhao Q; Wu H; Cheng CW; Das IJ
Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4655-61. PubMed ID: 21928638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effective generation of the spread-out-Bragg peak from the laser accelerated proton beams using a carbon-proton mixed target.
Yoo SH; Cho I; Cho S; Song Y; Jung WG; Kim DH; Shin D; Lee SB; Pae KH; Park SY
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2014 Dec; 37(4):635-44. PubMed ID: 25154880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of output factor, range, and spread-out bragg peak for proton therapy.
Kim DW; Lim YK; Ahn SH; Shin J; Shin D; Yoon M; Lee SB; Kim DY; Park SY
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 20599372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deep learning proton beam range estimation model for quality assurance based on two-dimensional scintillated light distributions in simulations.
Lee E; Cho B; Kwak J; Jeong C; Park MJ; Kim SW; Song SY; Goh Y
Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 50(11):7203-7213. PubMed ID: 37517077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determination of the Range and Spread-Out Bragg Peak Width of Proton Beams Using a Large-Volume Liquid Scintillator.
Henry T; Robertson D; Therriault-Proulx F; Beddar S
Int J Part Ther; 2017; 4(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 31773000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the influence of double and triple Gaussian proton kernel models on accuracy of dose calculations for spot scanning technique.
Hirayama S; Takayanagi T; Fujii Y; Fujimoto R; Fujitaka S; Umezawa M; Nagamine Y; Hosaka M; Yasui K; Omachi C; Toshito T
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1437-50. PubMed ID: 26936728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
