These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34629236)

  • 21. Comparing Outcomes in Orthognathic Surgery Using Clear Aligners Versus Conventional Fixed Appliances.
    Kankam H; Madari S; Sawh-Martinez R; Bruckman KC; Steinbacher DM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 30(5):1488-1491. PubMed ID: 31299750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Differences in finished case quality between Invisalign and traditional fixed appliances.
    Lin E; Julien K; Kesterke M; Buschang PH
    Angle Orthod; 2022 Mar; 92(2):173-179. PubMed ID: 35168256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparisons of maxillary incisor retraction effects for patients with first premolar extractions between Damon Q and Invisalign®: A retrospective study.
    Chen J; Wen J; Huang L; Zhang L; Han L; Li H
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Oct; 101(40):e30919. PubMed ID: 36221412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Do patients treated with Invisalign have less swelling after orthognathic surgery than those with fixed orthodontic appliances?
    Guntaka PK; Kiang K; Caprio R; Parry GJ; Padwa BL; Resnick CM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Feb; 163(2):243-251. PubMed ID: 36400644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Alterations of the oral microbiome in patients treated with the Invisalign system or with fixed appliances.
    Wang Q; Ma JB; Wang B; Zhang X; Yin YL; Bai H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Nov; 156(5):633-640. PubMed ID: 31677672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of maxillary anterior tooth movement between Invisalign and fixed appliances.
    Murphy SJ; Lee S; Scharm JC; Kim S; Amin AA; Wu TH; Lu WE; Ni A; Ko CC; Fields HW; Deguchi T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Jul; 164(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 36801092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stability of anterior crossbite correction: a randomized controlled trial with a 2-year follow-up.
    Wiedel AP; Bondemark L
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar; 85(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 25004240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Outcome assessment of orthodontic clear aligner vs fixed appliance treatment in a teenage population with mild malocclusions.
    Borda AF; Garfinkle JS; Covell DA; Wang M; Doyle L; Sedgley CM
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Jul; 90(4):485-490. PubMed ID: 33378505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fixed versus removable orthodontic appliances to correct anterior crossbite in the mixed dentition--a randomized controlled trial.
    Wiedel AP; Bondemark L
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 25114123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Does aligner refinement have the same efficiency in deep bite correction?: A retrospective study.
    Kang J; Jeon HH; Shahabuddin N
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):338. PubMed ID: 38491450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment.
    Patel MP; Henriques JF; Freitas KM; Grec RH
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):44-51. PubMed ID: 25162565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantifying the efficacy of overbite reduction in patients treated with clear aligners using optimized versus conventional attachments.
    Burashed H; Sebai RE
    J World Fed Orthod; 2023 Jun; 12(3):105-111. PubMed ID: 37142480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The efficacy of anterior open bite closure when using Invisalign's optimized extrusion versus conventional attachments.
    Burashed H
    J World Fed Orthod; 2023 Jun; 12(3):112-117. PubMed ID: 37164825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Early vs late orthodontic treatment of deepbite: a prospective clinical trial in growing subjects.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Giuntini V; Masucci C; Vangelisti A; Defraia E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22748993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quality of life in an adolescent orthodontic population.
    Sharma R; Drummond R; Wiltshire W; Schroth R; Lekic M; Bertone M; Tate R
    Angle Orthod; 2021 Nov; 91(6):718-724. PubMed ID: 34260709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does age influence deep overbite correction with Invisalign? A prospective study evaluating mandibular incisor intrusion in adolescents vs adults.
    Kravitz ND; Hansa I; Vaid NR; Moshiri M; Adel SM
    Angle Orthod; 2024 Mar; 94(2):145-150. PubMed ID: 37939782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical limitations of Invisalign.
    Phan X; Ling PH
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2007 Apr; 73(3):263-6. PubMed ID: 17439714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cephalometric evaluation of two treatment strategies for deep overbite correction.
    Hans MG; Kishiyama C; Parker SH; Wolf GR; Noachtar R
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(4):265-74; discussion 275-6. PubMed ID: 7978521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cephalometric comparison of adult anterior open bite treatment using clear aligners and fixed appliances.
    Garnett BS; Mahood K; Nguyen M; Al-Khateeb A; Liu S; Boyd R; Oh H
    Angle Orthod; 2019 Jan; 89(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 30280928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Invisalign® treatment in the anterior region: were the predicted tooth movements achieved?
    Krieger E; Seiferth J; Marinello I; Jung BA; Wriedt S; Jacobs C; Wehrbein H
    J Orofac Orthop; 2012 Sep; 73(5):365-76. PubMed ID: 22890691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.