These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3462934)

  • 21. Assessment of screen/film combinations for cephalometric radiography.
    McNicol A; Stirrups DR
    Br J Orthod; 1985 Jul; 12(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 3860251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ektaspeed and a screen/film system compared with Ultra-Speed in the interpretation of early proximal caries.
    Kogon SL; Stephens RG; Reid JA; Donner A
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1984 May; 50(5):397-401. PubMed ID: 6375836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Six screen-film combinations using the Oralix Pan DC.
    Kimura K; Underhill TE; Archila L; Linse JM; Langland OE
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1987 Jun; 29(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 3478427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Modification of an automatic exposure control system for mammography to accommodate multiple-speed, screen-film systems.
    Rossi RP; Williams C; Gill D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Oct; 151(4):685-6. PubMed ID: 3262269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Digital roentgenographic systems based on photostimulated screens and their comparison with roentgenographic screen-film sets].
    Gorelik FG; Stankevich NE
    Med Tekh; 2006; (5):10-3. PubMed ID: 17133936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Physical and psychophysical criteria for the evaluation of the quality of radiographic images].
    Borasi G; Delpiano S; Landini A; Orsini S; Papagni L; Tosi G
    Radiol Med; 1982 May; 68(5):401-7. PubMed ID: 7111792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Improvement of zygomatic arch representation using compensating screens].
    Fuhrmann A
    Dtsch Z Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1985; 9(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 3858039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Acceptance testing and routine quality control in general radiography: mobile units and film/screen fixed systems.
    Gray L; Dowling A; Gallagher A; Gorman D; O'Connor U; Devine M; Larkin A; Walsh C; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):276-8. PubMed ID: 18326885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Speeds of film-screen combinations for radiography.
    Holloway AF; Cheng CN; Paix D
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1983 Dec; 34(4):331-4. PubMed ID: 6668304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. TMJ radiography with emphasis on tomography.
    Rosenberg HM; Silha RE
    Dent Radiogr Photogr; 1982; 55(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 6955219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Resolution of several screen-film combinations in rotational panoramic radiography.
    McDavid WD; Morris CR; Tronje G; Welander U
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 3459994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The use of x-ray film by dental professionals in the United States.
    Platin E
    Tex Dent J; 2002 May; 119(5):396-400, 402. PubMed ID: 12046402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Optimization of the thoracic radiograph. Experimental and clinical study on the use of various film/screen combinations using rare earths].
    Bergonzini R; Gallini R; Giugni U; Robecchi D; Amato M
    Radiol Med; 1986 May; 72(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 3715076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reciprocity law failure for a film-screen combination: very long exposure times.
    Hale J; Thomas JW
    Health Phys; 1983 Sep; 45(3):780-2. PubMed ID: 6885487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Green-sensitive X-ray systems and specific features of working with them].
    Blinov NN; Gorelik FG; Reznik KA
    Med Tekh; 2002; (5):13-5. PubMed ID: 12512275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Transrenal and transcorporal immediate roentgen imaging using intensifying screens].
    Zink RA; Schmiedt E; Schätzel M
    Urologe A; 1984 Mar; 23(2):107-8. PubMed ID: 6539022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of the accuracy of cephalometric landmark location between two screen/film combinations.
    Stirrups DR
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 2774297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [The clinical evaluation of cephalograms using the single screen/single emulsion film system for improving image quality].
    Tanimoto K; Yamada K; Kodera Y; Imagawa H; Yoneda H; Sunayashiki T; Ogawa M; Wada T; Yamauchi K
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1986 Mar; 45(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 3458848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sensitometric evaluation of rare earth intensifying screen systems.
    Thunthy KH; Boozer CH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Jan; 59(1):102-6. PubMed ID: 3856198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.