These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3462961)

  • 1. [Chipping and cusp fractures in teeth restored with amalgam. Clinical studies and a few reflections on this problem].
    Malmström C
    Tidsskr Tandlaeger; 1986 Apr; 6(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 3462961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prevalence of cusp fractures in teeth restored with amalgam and with resin-based composite.
    Wahl MJ; Schmitt MM; Overton DA; Gordon MK
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Aug; 135(8):1127-32; quiz 1164-5. PubMed ID: 15387051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The fractured cusp.
    Knight GM
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1994 Aug; 49(8):404-5. PubMed ID: 9508976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth.
    Oliveira JP; Cochran MA; Moore BK
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9002870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture strength of premolars with Class 2 silver amalgam restorations.
    el-Sherif MH; Halhoul MN; Kamar AA; Nour el-Din A
    Oper Dent; 1988; 13(2):50-3. PubMed ID: 3270038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cuspal fracture with conventional Class II amalgam.
    Davis MW
    Dent Today; 1998 Dec; 17(12):42-4, 46-9. PubMed ID: 10752390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dental fractures on acute exposure to high altitude.
    Zadik Y; Einy S; Pokroy R; Bar Dayan Y; Goldstein L
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Jun; 77(6):654-7. PubMed ID: 16780246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frequency of amalgam replacement in general dental practice.
    Boyd MA; Richardson AS
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1985 Oct; 51(10):763-6. PubMed ID: 3904947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro comparison of cuspal fracture resistances of posterior teeth restored with various adhesive restorations.
    Cötert HS; Sen BH; Balkan M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(4):374-8. PubMed ID: 11508095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Retention design and clinical evaluation of amalgam-restored fractured posterior teeth].
    Hu ZK
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Ke Za Zhi; 1986 May; 21(3):160-2. PubMed ID: 3463489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized clinical comparison of endodontically treated teeth restored with amalgam or with fiber posts and resin composite: five-year results.
    Mannocci F; Qualtrough AJ; Worthington HV; Watson TF; Pitt Ford TR
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 15765952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cuspal deflection of maxillary premolars restored with bonded amalgam.
    el-Badrawy WA
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 10823082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Faults and failures of restorations].
    Cuartas ME
    Acta Clin Odontol; 1981 Nov; 4(8):21-6. PubMed ID: 6949420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On material choice and fracture susceptibility of restored teeth: an asymptotic stress analysis approach.
    Kahler B; Kotousov A; Melkoumian N
    Dent Mater; 2006 Dec; 22(12):1109-14. PubMed ID: 16375962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations: a challenge for the profession.
    Klausner LH; Green TG; Charbeneau GT
    Oper Dent; 1987; 12(3):105-12. PubMed ID: 3476910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of restorative materials on cuspal flexure.
    Medige J; Deng Y; Yu X; Davis EL; Joynt RB
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Aug; 26(8):571-6. PubMed ID: 8602435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture strength of weakened human premolars restored with amalgam with and without cusp coverage.
    Mondelli RF; Barbosa WF; Mondelli J; Franco EB; Carvalho RM
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 10388373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strength of amalgam restorations bonded with Amalgambond.
    Ianzano JA; Mastrodomenico J; Gwinnett AJ
    Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 8329154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture strength of cusp replacing resin composite restorations.
    Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 12744406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of restorative procedures on the strength of endodontically treated molars.
    Linn J; Messer HH
    J Endod; 1994 Oct; 20(10):479-85. PubMed ID: 7714419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.