These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34629758)
1. Asymptotic analysis of reliability measures for an imperfect dichotomous test. Slynko A Stat Pap (Berl); 2022; 63(4):995-1012. PubMed ID: 34629758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the accuracy of an imperfect dichotomous test in a multiple testing context. Slynko A Math Biosci; 2022 Jan; 343():108729. PubMed ID: 34762905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring inter-rater reliability for nominal data - which coefficients and confidence intervals are appropriate? Zapf A; Castell S; Morawietz L; Karch A BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Aug; 16():93. PubMed ID: 27495131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Large Sample Confidence Intervals for Item Response Theory Reliability Coefficients. Andersson B; Xin T Educ Psychol Meas; 2018 Feb; 78(1):32-45. PubMed ID: 29795945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Forcing dichotomous disease classification from reference standards leads to bias in diagnostic accuracy estimates: A simulation study. Jenniskens K; Naaktgeboren CA; Reitsma JB; Hooft L; Moons KGM; van Smeden M J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jul; 111():1-10. PubMed ID: 30904568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A program for computing the prediction probability and the related receiver operating characteristic graph. Jordan D; Steiner M; Kochs EF; Schneider G Anesth Analg; 2010 Dec; 111(6):1416-21. PubMed ID: 21059744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bias in estimating accuracy of a binary screening test with differential disease verification. Alonzo TA; Brinton JT; Ringham BM; Glueck DH Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(15):1852-64. PubMed ID: 21495059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Probability estimation with machine learning methods for dichotomous and multicategory outcome: theory. Kruppa J; Liu Y; Biau G; Kohler M; König IR; Malley JD; Ziegler A Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):534-63. PubMed ID: 24478134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Probability estimation with machine learning methods for dichotomous and multicategory outcome: applications. Kruppa J; Liu Y; Diener HC; Holste T; Weimar C; König IR; Ziegler A Biom J; 2014 Jul; 56(4):564-83. PubMed ID: 24989843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial. Deckert A; Anders S; de Allegri M; Nguyen HT; Souares A; McMahon S; Boerner K; Meurer M; Herbst K; Sand M; Koeppel L; Siems T; Brugnara L; Brenner S; Burk R; Lou D; Kirrmaier D; Duan Y; Ovchinnikova S; Marx M; Kräusslich HG; Knop M; Bärnighausen T; Denkinger C Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):39. PubMed ID: 33419461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An asymptotic approximation to the N-mixture model for the estimation of disease prevalence. Brintz B; Fuentes C; Madsen L Biometrics; 2018 Dec; 74(4):1512-1518. PubMed ID: 29870071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A method of bias correction for maximal reliability with dichotomous measures. Penev S; Raykov T Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):163-75. PubMed ID: 19397846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Testing for equality of distributions using the concept of (niche) overlap. Parkinson-Schwarz JH; Bathke AC Stat Pap (Berl); 2022; 63(1):225-242. PubMed ID: 35125665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimizing Between-Session Reliability for Quadriceps Peak Torque and Rate of Torque Development Measures. Grindstaff TL; Palimenio MR; Franco M; Anderson D; Bagwell JJ; Katsavelis D J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Jul; 33(7):1840-1847. PubMed ID: 30289874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Reliability and Comparative Analysis of the New Randomized King-Devick Test. Nguyen MQ; King D; Pearce AJ J Neuroophthalmol; 2020 Jun; 40(2):207-212. PubMed ID: 31453920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bias due to composite reference standards in diagnostic accuracy studies. Schiller I; van Smeden M; Hadgu A; Libman M; Reitsma JB; Dendukuri N Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(9):1454-70. PubMed ID: 26555849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and true-score measures of binary items as a function of their Rasch difficulty parameter. Dimitrov DM J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(3):222-33. PubMed ID: 12904673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]