BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34632312)

  • 1. Modeling the effects of steroid implant use on the environmental and economic sustainability of Brazilian beef production.
    Capper JL; De Carvalho TB; Hancock AS; Sá Filho OG; Odeyemi I; Bartram DJ
    Transl Anim Sci; 2021 Oct; 5(4):txab144. PubMed ID: 34632312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of growth performance, carcass characteristics, and methane and CO2 emissions of growing and finishing cattle raised in extensive or partial-intensive cow-calf production systems.
    Carlson ZE; McPhillips LJ; Stowell RR; Erickson GE; Drewnoski M; MacDonald JC
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 36592745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Grass-fed vs. grain-fed beef systems: performance, economic, and environmental trade-offs.
    Klopatek SC; Marvinney E; Duarte T; Kendall A; Yang XC; Oltjen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 34936699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.
    Landrigan PJ; Raps H; Cropper M; Bald C; Brunner M; Canonizado EM; Charles D; Chiles TC; Donohue MJ; Enck J; Fenichel P; Fleming LE; Ferrier-Pages C; Fordham R; Gozt A; Griffin C; Hahn ME; Haryanto B; Hixson R; Ianelli H; James BD; Kumar P; Laborde A; Law KL; Martin K; Mu J; Mulders Y; Mustapha A; Niu J; Pahl S; Park Y; Pedrotti ML; Pitt JA; Ruchirawat M; Seewoo BJ; Spring M; Stegeman JJ; Suk W; Symeonides C; Takada H; Thompson RC; Vicini A; Wang Z; Whitman E; Wirth D; Wolff M; Yousuf AK; Dunlop S
    Ann Glob Health; 2023; 89(1):23. PubMed ID: 36969097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of improved performance in the U.S. dairy cattle industry on environmental impacts between 2007 and 2017.
    Capper JL; Cady RA
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Jan; 98(1):. PubMed ID: 31622980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An environmental, economic, and social assessment of improving cattle finishing weight or average daily gain within U.S. beef production.
    White RR; Capper JL
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Dec; 91(12):5801-12. PubMed ID: 24146151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Growth-promoting technologies decrease the carbon footprint, ammonia emissions, and costs of California beef production systems.
    Stackhouse KR; Rotz CA; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4656-65. PubMed ID: 22952364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Galyean appreciation club review: a holistic perspective of the societal relevance of beef production and its impacts on climate change.
    Tedeschi LO; Beauchemin KA
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 36645233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cow-calf reproductive, genetic, and nutritional management to improve the sustainability of whole beef production systems.
    White RR; Brady M; Capper JL; McNamara JP; Johnson KA
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):3197-211. PubMed ID: 26115306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methods and consequences of including reduction in greenhouse gas emission in beef cattle multiple-trait selection.
    Barwick SA; Henzell AL; Herd RM; Walmsley BJ; Arthur PF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Apr; 51(1):18. PubMed ID: 31035930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Calf- and Yearling-Fed Beef Production Systems, With and Without the Use of Growth Promotants.
    Basarab J; Baron V; López-Campos Ó; Aalhus J; Haugen-Kozyra K; Okine E
    Animals (Basel); 2012 Apr; 2(2):195-220. PubMed ID: 26486917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of farming practices for greenhouse gas mitigation and subsequent alternative land use on environmental impacts of beef cattle production systems.
    Nguyen TT; Doreau M; Eugène M; Corson MS; Garcia-Launay F; Chesneau G; van der Werf HM
    Animal; 2013 May; 7(5):860-9. PubMed ID: 23190866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The environmental and economic impact of removing growth-enhancing technologies from U.S. beef production.
    Capper JL; Hayes DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Oct; 90(10):3527-37. PubMed ID: 22665660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systems.
    Stackhouse-Lawson KR; Rotz CA; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4641-55. PubMed ID: 22952361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Climate mitigation by dairy intensification depends on intensive use of spared grassland.
    Styles D; Gonzalez-Mejia A; Moorby J; Foskolos A; Gibbons J
    Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Feb; 24(2):681-693. PubMed ID: 28940511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Greenhouse gas balance and carbon footprint of pasture-based beef cattle production systems in the tropical region (Atlantic Forest biome).
    Oliveira PPA; Berndt A; Pedroso AF; Alves TC; Pezzopane JRM; Sakamoto LS; Henrique FL; Rodrigues PHM
    Animal; 2020 Sep; 14(S3):s427-s437. PubMed ID: 32829724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cattle and carcass performance, and life cycle assessment of production systems utilizing additive combinations of growth promotant technologies.
    Webb MJ; Block JJ; Harty AA; Salverson RR; Daly RF; Jaeger JR; Underwood KR; Funston RN; Pendell DP; Rotz CA; Olson KC; Blair AD
    Transl Anim Sci; 2020 Oct; 4(4):txaa216. PubMed ID: 33409468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does increasing milk yield per cow reduce greenhouse gas emissions? A system approach.
    Zehetmeier M; Baudracco J; Hoffmann H; Heißenhuber A
    Animal; 2012 Jan; 6(1):154-66. PubMed ID: 22436163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Environmental impact of primary beef production chain in Colombia: Carbon footprint, non-renewable energy and land use using Life Cycle Assessment.
    González-Quintero R; Bolívar-Vergara DM; Chirinda N; Arango J; Pantevez H; Barahona-Rosales R; Sánchez-Pinzón MS
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jun; 773():145573. PubMed ID: 33940733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Environmental performance of commercial beef production systems utilizing conventional productivity-enhancing technologies.
    Aboagye IA; Cordeiro MRC; McAllister TA; May ML; Hannon SJ; Booker CW; Parr SL; Schunicht OC; Burciaga-Robles LO; Grimson TM; Boonstra E; Mengistu GF; Fulawka DL; Ominski KH
    Transl Anim Sci; 2022 Jul; 6(3):txac074. PubMed ID: 37283958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.