These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34632538)

  • 21. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.
    Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of Hearing Device Use on Speech-in-Noise Performance in Children with Severe-to-Profound Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Griffin AM; Atri A; Licameli G; Stiles DJ
    Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):588-602. PubMed ID: 36575571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW; Walden TC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression and Digital Noise Reduction on Word Recognition and Satisfaction Ratings in Noise in Adult Hearing Aid Users.
    Plyler PN; Tardy B; Hedrick M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):103-114. PubMed ID: 30461384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
    Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss.
    Kuchinsky SE; Ahlstrom JB; Vaden KI; Cute SL; Humes LE; Dubno JR; Eckert MA
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Jan; 50(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 23157603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies.
    Besser J; Festen JM; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):24-41. PubMed ID: 25207850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise.
    Gosselin PA; Gagné JP
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):786-92. PubMed ID: 21916790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Text Captioning Buffers Against the Effects of Background Noise and Hearing Loss on Memory for Speech.
    Payne BR; Silcox JW; Crandell HA; Lash A; Ferguson SH; Lohani M
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):115-127. PubMed ID: 34260436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of age and age-related hearing loss on the neural representation of speech cues.
    Tremblay KL; Piskosz M; Souza P
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Jul; 114(7):1332-43. PubMed ID: 12842732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Listening Effort and Speech Perception Performance Using Different Facemasks.
    Mendel LL; Pousson MA; Shukla B; Sander K; Larson B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Nov; 65(11):4354-4368. PubMed ID: 36215671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Task-Related Vigilance During Word Recognition in Noise for Older Adults with Hearing Loss.
    Kuchinsky SE; Vaden KI; Ahlstrom JB; Cute SL; Humes LE; Dubno JR; Eckert MA
    Exp Aging Res; 2016; 42(1):50-66. PubMed ID: 26683041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
    Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Toward a Listening Training Paradigm: Evaluation in Normal-Hearing Young and Middle-Aged Adults.
    Van Wilderode M; Van Humbeeck N; Krampe RT; van Wieringen A
    Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1229-1239. PubMed ID: 37076940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of background noise and memory load on listening effort of young adults with and without hearing loss.
    Nishida K; Obuchi C; Shiroma M; Okamoto H; Noguchi Y
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2024 Oct; 51(5):885-891. PubMed ID: 39197288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Tone perception in Mandarin-speaking school age children with otitis media with effusion.
    Cai T; McPherson B; Li C; Yang F
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0183394. PubMed ID: 28829840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.