These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34632899)

  • 1. Mucosal biomarkers for endometrial receptivity: A promising yet underexplored aspect of reproductive medicine.
    Jain M; Samokhodskaya L; Mladova E; Panina O
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2022 Feb; 68(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 34632899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Oxidative stress biomarkers in endometrial secretions: A comparison between successful and unsuccessful in vitro fertilization cycles.
    Rahiminejad ME; Moaddab A; Ganji M; Eskandari N; Yepez M; Rabiee S; Wise M; Ruano R; Ranjbar A
    J Reprod Immunol; 2016 Aug; 116():70-5. PubMed ID: 27232354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro fertilization and multiple pregnancies: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(18):1-63. PubMed ID: 23074488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Endometrial secretion analysis identifies a cytokine profile predictive of pregnancy in IVF.
    Boomsma CM; Kavelaars A; Eijkemans MJ; Lentjes EG; Fauser BC; Heijnen CJ; Macklon NS
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Jun; 24(6):1427-35. PubMed ID: 19228761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conventional and modern markers of endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Craciunas L; Gallos I; Chu J; Bourne T; Quenby S; Brosens JJ; Coomarasamy A
    Hum Reprod Update; 2019 Mar; 25(2):202-223. PubMed ID: 30624659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of a new comprehensive and reliable endometrial receptivity map (ER Map/ER Grade) based on RT-qPCR gene expression analysis.
    Enciso M; Carrascosa JP; Sarasa J; Martínez-Ortiz PA; Munné S; Horcajadas JA; Aizpurua J
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Feb; 33(2):220-228. PubMed ID: 29315421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Global transcriptomic changes occur in uterine fluid-derived extracellular vesicles during the endometrial window for embryo implantation.
    Giacomini E; Scotti GM; Vanni VS; Lazarevic D; Makieva S; Privitera L; Signorelli S; Cantone L; Bollati V; Murdica V; Tonon G; Papaleo E; Candiani M; Viganò P
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Jul; 36(8):2249-2274. PubMed ID: 34190319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can biomarkers identified from the uterine fluid transcriptome be used to establish a noninvasive endometrial receptivity prediction tool? A proof-of-concept study.
    He A; Wu H; Zou Y; Wan C; Zhao J; Zhang Q; Liu N; Liu D; Li Y; Fu J; Li H; Huang X; Yang T; Hu C; Hou Z; Sun Y; Dong X; Wu J; Lu S; Li Y
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2023 Feb; 21(1):20. PubMed ID: 36805767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identifying biomarkers for predicting successful embryo implantation: applying single to multi-OMICs to improve reproductive outcomes.
    Hernández-Vargas P; Muñoz M; Domínguez F
    Hum Reprod Update; 2020 Feb; 26(2):264-301. PubMed ID: 32096829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Circulating MMP-7 and VEGF as potential predictive biomarkers for recurrent implantation failures.
    Benkhalifa M; Zidi W; Bahri H; Mahjoub S; Boudhraa K; Sanhaji H; Khorsi-Cauet H; Feki M; Benkhalifa M; Allal-Elasmi M
    Zygote; 2021 Oct; 29(5):365-371. PubMed ID: 33736747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differential proteomic analysis of endometrial fluid suggests increased inflammation and impaired glucose metabolism in non-implantative IVF cycles and pinpoints PYGB as a putative implantation marker.
    Azkargorta M; Escobes I; Iloro I; Osinalde N; Corral B; Ibañez-Perez J; Exposito A; Prieto B; Elortza F; Matorras R
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Oct; 33(10):1898-1906. PubMed ID: 30169642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cytokine profiling in endometrial secretions: a non-invasive window on endometrial receptivity.
    Boomsma CM; Kavelaars A; Eijkemans MJ; Amarouchi K; Teklenburg G; Gutknecht D; Fauser BJ; Heijnen CJ; Macklon NS
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2009 Jan; 18(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 19146774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increased AIF-1-mediated TNF-α expression during implantation phase in IVF cycles with GnRH antagonist protocol.
    Xu B; Zhou M; Wang J; Zhang D; Guo F; Si C; Leung PCK; Zhang A
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Jul; 33(7):1270-1280. PubMed ID: 29897458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anti-phospholipid antibody may reduce endometrial receptivity during the window of embryo implantation.
    Tan X; Ding J; Pu D; Wu J
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Jun; 50(6):101912. PubMed ID: 32950746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Growth hormone supplementation may improve the pregnancy rate and endometrial receptivity among women aged more than 40 years undergoing in vitro fertilization.
    Lan KC; Lin PY; Chang YC; Chen YJ; Tsai YR; Ismaeil Mohamed IS; Kang HY
    Biomed J; 2019 Dec; 42(6):411-416. PubMed ID: 31948605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence that the endometrial microbiota has an effect on implantation success or failure.
    Moreno I; Codoñer FM; Vilella F; Valbuena D; Martinez-Blanch JF; Jimenez-Almazán J; Alonso R; Alamá P; Remohí J; Pellicer A; Ramon D; Simon C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 215(6):684-703. PubMed ID: 27717732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are endometrial parameters by three-dimensional ultrasound and power Doppler angiography related to in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer outcome?
    Mercé LT; Barco MJ; Bau S; Troyano J
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 17555754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endometrial scratching in women with implantation failure after a first IVF/ICSI cycle; does it lead to a higher live birth rate? The SCRaTCH study: a randomized controlled trial (NTR 5342).
    van Hoogenhuijze NE; Torrance HL; Mol F; Laven JSE; Scheenjes E; Traas MAF; Janssen C; Cohlen B; Teklenburg G; de Bruin JP; van Oppenraaij R; Maas JWM; Moll E; Fleischer K; van Hooff MH; de Koning C; Cantineau A; Lambalk CB; Verberg M; Nijs M; Manger AP; van Rumste M; van der Voet LF; Preys-Bosman A; Visser J; Brinkhuis E; den Hartog JE; Sluijmer A; Jansen FW; Hermes W; Bandell ML; Pelinck MJ; van Disseldorp J; van Wely M; Smeenk J; Pieterse QD; Boxmeer JC; Groenewoud ER; Eijkemans MJC; Kasius JC; Broekmans FJM
    BMC Womens Health; 2017 Jul; 17(1):47. PubMed ID: 28732531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relationship between some endometrial secretion cytokines and in vitro fertilization.
    Rahiminejad ME; Moaddab A; Ebrahimi M; Rabiee S; Zamani A; Ezzati M; Abdollah Shamshirsaz A
    Iran J Reprod Med; 2015 Sep; 13(9):557-62. PubMed ID: 26568760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of endometrial receptivity during implantation window in women with unexplained infertility.
    Wang L; Lv S; Mao W; Pei M; Yang X
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2020 Oct; 36(10):917-921. PubMed ID: 32070163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.