These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34633273)

  • 1. Experimental assessment of the effect of wearing hearing protectors on the audibility of railway warning signals for normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Arz JP; Grimault N; El Sawaf O
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2022 Dec; 28(4):2385-2395. PubMed ID: 34633273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of wearing hearing protectors on the audibility of railway warning signals - an experimental study.
    Arz JP; Gettliffe JP; Delattre P
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2018 Mar; 24(1):149-159. PubMed ID: 28869404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Audibility of reverse alarms under hearing protectors for normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Robinson GS; Casali JG
    Ergonomics; 1995 Nov; 38(11):2281-99. PubMed ID: 7498188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of warble tones in wideband noise with and without hearing protection devices.
    Letowski T; McGee L
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1993 Dec; 37(6):607-14. PubMed ID: 8304681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of hearing protection on narrowband signal detection in industrial noise.
    Abel SM; Kunov H; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alberti PW
    J Otolaryngol; 1983 Apr; 12(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 6864854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The fluctuating masker benefit for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with equal audibility at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.
    Jensen KK; Bernstein JGW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Apr; 145(4):2113. PubMed ID: 31046298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. German criteria for selection of hearing protectors in the interest of good signal audibility.
    Liedtke M
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2009; 15(2):163-74. PubMed ID: 19534849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of audibility on better-ear glimpsing as a function of frequency in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Rana B; Buchholz JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2195. PubMed ID: 29716302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Audibility and Suprathreshold Deficits on Speech Recognition for Listeners With Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Bost TJM; Versfeld NJ; Goverts ST
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 31242137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21. PubMed ID: 1597602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling alarm detection in noise for normal and hearing-impaired listeners: the effect of elevated thresholds and enlarged auditory filters.
    El Sawaf O; Effa F; Arz JP; Grimault N
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2024 Mar; 30(1):264-271. PubMed ID: 38124394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Mehraei G; Shamma S; Gallun FJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):293-306. PubMed ID: 23636210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consonant reception in noise by listeners with mild and moderate sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Zurek PM; Delhorne LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Nov; 82(5):1548-59. PubMed ID: 3693695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Most Comfortable Listening Level and Speech Attenuation by Hearing Protectors.
    Letowski T; Magistro DM; Ritter AC
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 1995 Jan; 1(2):153-159. PubMed ID: 10603546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Masking release for hearing-impaired listeners: The effect of increased audibility through reduction of amplitude variability.
    Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; D'Aquila LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4452. PubMed ID: 28679277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Hogan CA; Turner CW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jul; 104(1):432-41. PubMed ID: 9670535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of hearing protectors on the attention demand of warning sounds.
    Wilkins PA; Martin AM
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7209372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory perception with level-dependent hearing protectors. The effects of age and hearing loss.
    Abel SM; Armstrong NM; Giguère C
    Scand Audiol; 1993; 22(2):71-85. PubMed ID: 8322001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detectability of auditory warning signals in the ambient noise of Dutch train cabins.
    van der Hoek-Snieders HEM; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    Ergonomics; 2021 Apr; 64(4):474-484. PubMed ID: 33059526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.