149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34633295)
1. A phase sensitive x-ray breast tomosynthesis system: Preliminary patient images with cancer lesions.
Ghani MU; Fajardo LL; Omoumi F; Yan A; Jenkins P; Wong M; Li Y; Peterson ME; Callahan EJ; Hillis SL; Zheng B; Wu X; Liu H
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Oct; 66(21):. PubMed ID: 34633295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and preclinical evaluation of a patient-specific high energy x-ray phase sensitive breast tomosynthesis system.
Ghani MU; Wu X; Fajardo LL; Jing Z; Wong MD; Zheng B; Omoumi F; Li Y; Yan A; Jenkins P; Hillis SL; Linstroth L; Liu H
Med Phys; 2021 May; 48(5):2511-2520. PubMed ID: 33523479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experimental characterization of a direct conversion amorphous selenium detector with thicker conversion layer for dual-energy contrast-enhanced breast imaging.
Scaduto DA; Tousignant O; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):3965-3977. PubMed ID: 28543761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detectability comparison of simulated tumors in digital breast tomosynthesis using high-energy X-ray inline phase sensitive and commercial imaging systems.
Ghani MU; Wong MD; Omoumi FH; Zheng B; Fajardo LL; Yan A; Wu X; Liu H
Phys Med; 2018 Mar; 47():34-41. PubMed ID: 29609816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Imaging performance of an amorphous selenium digital mammography detector in a breast tomosynthesis system.
Zhao B; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1978-87. PubMed ID: 18561674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image quality of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: effects of projection-view distributions.
Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Goodsitt M; Carson PL; Hadjiiski L; Schmitz A; Eberhard JW; Claus BE
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5703-12. PubMed ID: 21992385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of amorphous selenium detector thickness on dual-energy digital breast imaging.
Hu YH; Zhao W
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111904. PubMed ID: 25370637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implementation and evaluation of an expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm for gamma emission breast tomosynthesis.
Gong Z; Klanian K; Patel T; Sullivan O; Williams MB
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7580-92. PubMed ID: 23231306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. X-ray phase-contrast tomosynthesis for improved breast tissue discrimination.
Schleede S; Bech M; Grandl S; Sztrókay A; Herzen J; Mayr D; Stockmar M; Potdevin G; Zanette I; Rack A; Weitkamp T; Pfeiffer F
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Mar; 83(3):531-6. PubMed ID: 24387825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Low dose high energy x-ray in-line phase sensitive imaging prototype: Investigation of optimal geometric conditions and design parameters.
Ghani MU; Yan A; Wong MD; Li Y; Ren L; Wu X; Liu H
J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(6):667-82. PubMed ID: 26756405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detectability comparison between a high energy x-ray phase sensitive and mammography systems in imaging phantoms with varying glandular-adipose ratios.
Ghani MU; Wong MD; Wu D; Zheng B; Fajardo LL; Yan A; Fuh J; Wu X; Liu H
Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(9):3523-3538. PubMed ID: 28379851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Scatter radiation in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.
Sechopoulos I; Suryanarayanan S; Vedantham S; D'Orsi CJ; Karellas A
Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):564-76. PubMed ID: 17388174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High resolution stationary digital breast tomosynthesis using distributed carbon nanotube x-ray source array.
Qian X; Tucker A; Gidcumb E; Shan J; Yang G; Calderon-Colon X; Sultana S; Lu J; Zhou O; Spronk D; Sprenger F; Zhang Y; Kennedy D; Farbizio T; Jing Z
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2090-9. PubMed ID: 22482630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of the glandular breast dose for a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
Rodrigues L; Magalhaes LA; Braz D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 25480841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects on image quality of a 2D antiscatter grid in x-ray digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience using the dual modality (x-ray and molecular) breast tomosynthesis scanner.
Patel T; Peppard H; Williams MB
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1720. PubMed ID: 27036570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An object-oriented simulator for 3D digital breast tomosynthesis imaging system.
Seyyedi S; Cengiz K; Kamasak M; Yildirim I
Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():250689. PubMed ID: 24371468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography.
James JR; Pavlicek W; Hanson JA; Boltz TF; Patel BK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):362-372. PubMed ID: 28112559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance of clustered microcalcification detection on breast phantom images acquired with an experimental system using variable scan angles, angular increments, and number of projection views.
Chan HP; Goodsitt MM; Helvie MA; Zelakiewicz S; Schmitz A; Noroozian M; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Nees AV; Neal CH; Carson P; Lu Y; Hadjiiski L; Wei J
Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):675-85. PubMed ID: 25007048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation and comparison of a CdTe based photon counting detector with an energy integrating detector for X-ray phase sensitive imaging of breast cancer.
Ghani MU; Omoumi FH; Wu X; Fajardo LL; Zheng B; Liu H
J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(2):207-219. PubMed ID: 34957945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Image quality evaluation of breast tomosynthesis with synchrotron radiation.
Malliori A; Bliznakova K; Speller RD; Horrocks JA; Rigon L; Tromba G; Pallikarakis N
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5621-34. PubMed ID: 22957628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
