268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34634092)
1. Pupil responses to implied motion in figurative and abstract paintings.
Castellotti S; Scipioni L; Mastandrea S; Del Viva MM
PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258490. PubMed ID: 34634092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pupillary response to real, illusory, and implied motion.
Castellotti S; Francisci C; Del Viva MM
PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0254105. PubMed ID: 34197536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pupillary response to representations of light in paintings.
Castellotti S; Conti M; Feitosa-Santana C; Del Viva MM
J Vis; 2020 Oct; 20(10):14. PubMed ID: 33052409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pupil dilation to illusory motion in peripheral drift images: Perception versus reality.
Beukema S; Olson JA; Jennings BJ; Kingdom FAA
J Vis; 2017 Jul; 17(8):1. PubMed ID: 28672367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A TMS study on the contribution of visual area V5 to the perception of implied motion in art and its appreciation.
Cattaneo Z; Schiavi S; Silvanto J; Nadal M
Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 8(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 26429631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Functional specificity and neural integration in the aesthetic appreciation of artworks with implied motion.
Bara I; Darda KM; Kurz AS; Ramsey R
Eur J Neurosci; 2021 Nov; 54(9):7231-7259. PubMed ID: 34585450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Brain activity accompanying perception of implied motion in abstract paintings.
Kim CY; Blake R
Spat Vis; 2007; 20(6):545-60. PubMed ID: 18338460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Viewing of figurative paintings affects pseudoneglect as measured by line bisection.
Ciricugno A; Ferrari C; Rusconi ML; Cattaneo Z
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Nov; 82(8):3795-3803. PubMed ID: 33025464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Human, Nature, Dynamism: The Effects of Content and Movement Perception on Brain Activations during the Aesthetic Judgment of Representational Paintings.
Di Dio C; Ardizzi M; Massaro D; Di Cesare G; Gilli G; Marchetti A; Gallese V
Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():705. PubMed ID: 26793087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Movement in Aesthetic Experiences: What We Can Learn from Parkinson Disease.
Humphries S; Rick J; Weintraub D; Chatterjee A
J Cogn Neurosci; 2021 Jun; 33(7):1329-1342. PubMed ID: 34496397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modulation of corticospinal excitability during paintings viewing: A TMS study.
Fiori F; Plow E; Rusconi ML; Cattaneo Z
Neuropsychologia; 2020 Dec; 149():107664. PubMed ID: 33130160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Motion illusions in optical art presented for long durations are temporally distorted.
Nather FC; Mecca FF; Bueno JL
Perception; 2013; 42(7):742-50. PubMed ID: 24344550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bright illusions reduce the eye's pupil.
Laeng B; Endestad T
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Feb; 109(6):2162-7. PubMed ID: 22308422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Glossiness perception and its pupillary response.
Tamura H; Nakauchi S; Minami T
Vision Res; 2024 Jun; 219():108393. PubMed ID: 38579405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Directional Congruency Effect of Amplified Dilated Time Perception Induced by Looming Stimuli With Implied Motion Cues.
Seo J; Kim E; Kim SH
Percept Mot Skills; 2021 Apr; 128(2):585-604. PubMed ID: 33423612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What Gaze Fixation and Pupil Dilation Can Tell Us About Perceived Differences Between Abstract Art by Artists Versus by Children and Animals.
Alvarez SA; Winner E; Hawley-Dolan A; Snapper L
Perception; 2015; 44(11):1310-31. PubMed ID: 26562898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An Event-Related Potential Study of the Neural Response to Inferred Motion in Visual Images of Varying Coherence.
Jia L; Xu Y; Sweeney JA; Wang C; Sung B; Wang J
Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2117. PubMed ID: 31620054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Art expertise in construing meaning of representational and abstract artworks.
Bimler DL; Snellock M; Paramei GV
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():11-22. PubMed ID: 30390421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Binocular disparities, motion parallax, and geometric perspective in Patrick Hughes's 'reverspectives': theoretical analysis and empirical findings.
Rogers B; Gyani A
Perception; 2010; 39(3):330-48. PubMed ID: 20465170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cross-modal associations between paintings and sounds: Effects of embodiment.
Iosifyan M; Sidoroff-Dorso A; Wolfe J
Perception; 2022 Dec; 51(12):871-888. PubMed ID: 36217800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
