These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3463427)

  • 1. Comparison of xeroradiographs and two types of film for detecting caries in approximal surfaces of primary teeth.
    White SC; McMullin K
    Caries Res; 1986; 20(5):444-50. PubMed ID: 3463427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A clinical comparison of xeroradiography and film radiography for the detection of proximal caries.
    White SC; Gratt BM; Bauer JG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Feb; 65(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 3422729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of xeroradiographs and film for detection of proximal surface caries.
    White SC; Hollender L; Gratt BM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1984 May; 108(5):755-9. PubMed ID: 6588117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
    Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A clinical comparison between xeroradiography and film radiography for the detection of recurrent caries.
    Gratt BM; White SC; Bauer JG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Apr; 65(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 3163139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences between primary and permanent teeth in posteruptive age dependency of radiological changes in enamel during the development of approximal caries.
    Gruythuysen RJ; van der Linden LW; Wöltgens JH; Geraets WG
    J Biol Buccale; 1992 Mar; 20(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 1522086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
    Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
    Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An in vivo comparison of radiographic and directly assessed clinical caries status of posterior approximal surfaces in primary and permanent teeth.
    Pitts NB; Rimmer PA
    Caries Res; 1992; 26(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 1521308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of diagnostic performance on approximal caries detection among Swedish and Chinese senior dental students using analogue and digital radiographs.
    Minston W; Li G; Wennberg R; Näsström K; Shi XQ
    Swed Dent J; 2013; 37(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 23957142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of contact points on the performance of caries detection methods in approximal surfaces of primary molars: an in vivo study.
    Ribeiro AA; Purger F; Rodrigues JA; Oliveira PR; Lussi A; Monteiro AH; Alves HD; Assis JT; Vasconcellos AB
    Caries Res; 2015; 49(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 25572115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extraoral radiographic imaging of primary caries.
    Clifton TL; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 9780894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fibre optic transillumination and radiographs in diagnosis of approximal caries in primary teeth.
    Holt RD; Azevedo MR
    Community Dent Health; 1989 Sep; 6(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 2679987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of radiographic detection of residual caries in connection with tunnel restorations.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hörsted-Bindslev P
    Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 9438567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of xeroradiographs and film for detection of periapical lesions.
    White SC; Hollender L; Gratt BM
    J Dent Res; 1984 Jun; 63(6):910-3. PubMed ID: 6588078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Grey levels and radiolucent lesion depth as cavity predictors for approximal dentin caries lesions in primary teeth.
    Mariath AA; Casagrande L; de Araujo FB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Oct; 36(7):377-81. PubMed ID: 17881594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro performance of a pen-type laser fluorescence device and bitewing radiographs for approximal caries detection in permanent and primary teeth.
    de Souza JF; Diniz MB; Boldieri T; Rodrigues JA; Lussi A; de Cássia Loiola Cordeiro R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(6):702-10. PubMed ID: 25728100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition.
    Uprichard KK; Potter BJ; Russell CM; Schafer TE; Adair S; Weller RN
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The importance of the bitewing image in the early recognition of caries and periodontal diseases in children and adolescents].
    Poppe B; Faustmann U; Saffan G; Dietrich F
    Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1990; 78(8):705-11. PubMed ID: 2150460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of image quality on radiographic diagnosis of approximal caries.
    Svenson B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1991; 74():1-62. PubMed ID: 2035145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.