These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34634384)

  • 1. Reversing the relationship between a nontarget cue and the outcome facilitates subsequent human predictive learning.
    González G; Alcalá JA; Ogállar PM; Rosas JM; Callejas-Aguilera JE
    Behav Processes; 2021 Dec; 193():104529. PubMed ID: 34634384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experiencing extinction with a non-target cue facilitates reversal of a target conditioned inhibitor in human predictive learning.
    González G; Alcalá JA; Callejas-Aguilera JE; Rosas JM
    Behav Processes; 2019 Sep; 166():103898. PubMed ID: 31265879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural correlates of cue predictiveness during intentional and incidental associative learning: A time-frequency study.
    Do Carmo-Blanco N; Allen JJB
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Sep; 143():80-87. PubMed ID: 31254544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancement and reduction of associative retroactive cue interference by training in multiple contexts.
    Miguez G; Laborda MA; Miller RR
    Learn Behav; 2014 Dec; 42(4):318-29. PubMed ID: 25035103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Previously acquired cue-outcome structural knowledge guides new learning: Evidence from the retroactive-interference-between-cues effect.
    Luque D; Morís J; López FJ; Cobos PL
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Aug; 45(6):916-931. PubMed ID: 28405958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Absence of differential protection from extinction in human causal learning.
    George DN; Haddon JE; Griffiths O
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2024 Jul; 50(3):161-185. PubMed ID: 38647466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reminder Cues Modulate the Renewal Effect in Human Predictive Learning.
    Bustamante J; Uengoer M; Lachnit H
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1968. PubMed ID: 28066293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The onset of uncertainty facilitates the learning of new associations by increasing attention to cues.
    Easdale LC; Le Pelley ME; Beesley T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):193-208. PubMed ID: 28766369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Theory protection: Do humans protect existing associative links?
    Spicer SG; Mitchell CJ; Wills AJ; Blake KL; Jones PM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2022 Jan; 48(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 35143242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing the automaticity of an attentional bias towards predictive cues in human associative learning.
    Luque D; Molinero S; Jevtović M; Beesley T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 May; 73(5):762-780. PubMed ID: 31826714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Blocking is not 'pure' cue competition: Renewal-like effects in forward and backward blocking indicate contributions by associative cue interference.
    Miguez G; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2022 Apr; 48(2):145-159. PubMed ID: 35225640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrospective revaluation of associative retroactive cue interference.
    Miguez G; Laborda MA; Miller RR
    Learn Behav; 2014 Mar; 42(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 24142799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence for two attentional mechanisms during learning.
    Torrents-Rodas D; Koenig S; Uengoer M; Lachnit H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Dec; 74(12):2112-2123. PubMed ID: 33957827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Backward blocking: the role of within-compound associations and interference between cues trained apart.
    Vadillo MA; Castro L; Matute H; Wasserman EA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Feb; 61(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 17886193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determinants of extinction in a streamed trial procedure.
    Witnauer JE; Castiello S; Fung E; Pitliya RJ; Murphy RA; Miller RR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 May; 76(5):1155-1176. PubMed ID: 35722785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learned changes in outcome associability.
    Quigley MC; Eatherington CJ; Haselgrove M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Feb; 72(2):209-221. PubMed ID: 28627301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selective attention in human associative learning and recognition memory.
    Griffiths O; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):626-48. PubMed ID: 18999357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Signal detection analysis of contingency assessment: Associative interference and nonreinforcement impact cue-outcome contingency sensitivity, whereas cue density affects bias.
    Jozefowiez J; Urcelay GP; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2022 Jul; 48(3):190-202. PubMed ID: 35878081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spontaneous recovery and ABC renewal from retroactive cue interference.
    Miguez G; Cham HX; Miller RR
    Learn Behav; 2012 Mar; 40(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 21881896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Associative relationships in human predictive learning.
    Gámez AM; Martos R; Abad MJ; Rosas JM
    Span J Psychol; 2013; 16():E5. PubMed ID: 23866246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.